Tingets Tilstand: Pia Olsen Dyhr og den indre puddelhund Hjemvendt fra folkemødet taler vi selvfølgelig om shitstormen i SF - og når også forbi nogle af de nye ministre, næstformænd og statsrevisorer. Medvirkende: @NHJespersen @bennydamsgaard spreaker.com/episode/pia-ols…

Tingets Tilstand: Jo flere fjender, jo mere hæder I ugens afsnit vender vi regeringsgrundlaget og de stridigheder, der er brudt ud i Socialdemokratiet. Medvirkende: @NHJespersen @bennydamsgaard spreaker.com/episode/jo-fler…

I remember this. Incredible moment.

Der er efterhånden konsensus om, at Mette Frederiksen er på vej ud i verden. Men hvor? NATO dur ikke med Trump i Det Hvide Hus. EU-job eskalerer Grønlandskonflikten. Så hvad? Ligegyldigt FN-halløj? Eller at vente til 2029 og håbe på en mindre MAGA-præsident? #dkpol

Enig. Men for en god ordens skyld bør vi altid kalde det gratis tandlæge og ikke skattefinansieret. Ingen grund til at stryge de mest irriterende borgerlige med hårene. x.com/chriscurdtchris/status…

Borgerlige politikere og journalister der hører ordet "gratis" #dkpol

Tingets Tilstand: Forskellen på taktisk snilde og strategisk overblik I denne uge taler vi om, hvorfor højrefløjens angreb på Løkke tilsyneladende praller af på Moderaterne, og så vender vi Enhedslistens årsmøde og Jacob Ellemanns nye bog. Medvirkende: @NHJespersen @bennydamsgaard spreaker.com/episode/forskel…

The attempt to revive the Bundism vs Zionism debate is frankly really bizarre. One of the main reasons why the Bundism vs Zionism debate ended in the 20th century is because the leaders of various European countries, from Antonescu to Hitler, killed pretty much all the Jewish Bundists, and the Zionists more or less survived it, and the Jews who survived the Holocaust all became Zionists, i.e. committed to the creation and maintenance of a Jewish state. The Bundists and Zionists placed different bets on how the 20th century would play out for European Jews. The Bundists bet that Europe would not become existentially inhospitable to Jewish life, and that instead European Jews could remain valued and safe members of European societies, especially by falling in with the prevailing trends of socialism and secularism, and that building a distinct Jewish collective identity in Europe would be compatible with all these changes. Fundamentally the bet was that European modernity would not prove incompatible with organised Jewish social and religious life. The Zionist bet (which you can read in Herzl's Die Judenstaat and in his published diaries) was that industrialisation, European nationalism and mass society would lead to the destruction of European Jewish life, and that the only option was to try and escape while there was still time, and create a state of their own where they could defend themselves. Herzl wrote in Die Judenstaat in 1896, "I cannot imagine what appearance and form this will take. Will it be expropriation by some revolutionary force from below? Will it be proscription by some reactionary force from above? Will they banish us? Will they kill us? I expect all these forms and others." By 1945, as a rule of thumb, Europe's Jews either spoke English (i.e. lived in the United States, Britain, or the Anglophone world) or they were Hebrew- and Yiddish-speaking Zionists in Israel (or Mandatory Palestine at the time).* Europe pretty much killed off all the rest. It's helpful to remember that what the Jews call the 'Righteous Among the Nations', i.e. those who risked their lives to save Jews from the continent-wide Holocaust, are notable in part because they were so few in number. That's why the debate over Bundism ended after the War: both groups placed their bets on what the 20th century would mean for European Jews, and it turned out that the Zionists were right and the Bundists were wrong, and the consequence is that the former survived and the latter mostly died. It was a very high-stakes and tragic bet! * The one exception to this are French Jews, but as usual it is the exception which proves the rule. About a third of French Jews are the descendents of the Jews of Algeria who had been there for over a thousand years, but fled to France when France ended its colonial rule over Algeria, since to remain behind under Arab rule would mean almost-certain death.

Nej det viste den ikke. Den viste at efter Charlie Kirk fulgte mange republikanerne som får efter retorikken. At politisk vold ikke er ok, er ikke en holdning de holder. Meningsmålinger på principielle men aktuelle spørgsmål vil altid blive meget skæve. Her 1 år forinden:

This sums up Netanyahu's legacy

Johnny Nim fra Det Faglige Hus tager sejrsrunder i medierne oven på medlemsvæksten, mens journalisterne undlader at spørge ind til det økonomiske grundlag for succeshistorien. #dkmedier piopio.dk/hvorfor-spoerger-i…

Jeg var i P1 Morgen og Radio4 Debat for at forklare, hvorfor jeg anser fremvæksten af de såkaldte gule fagforeninger som Det Faglige Hus for at være en trussel mod den danske arbejdsmarkedsmodel. dr.dk/lyd/p1/p1-morgen/p1-mo… radio4.dk/podcasts/radio4-de…

still not quite over the fact that i watched 15 year olds get sued for millions of dollars for downloading twelve songs and now we all have to accept AI slop because every tech company in the known universe decided that IP laws don't exist now that they're inconvenient for them

Med al respekt for regeringsforhandlingerne: Det er dagens - afgjort - største nyhed! #dkpol jyllands-posten.dk/erhverv/E…

Den unikke, effektive og populære danske arbejdsmarkedsmodel er truet, og de rigtige fagforeninger kan ikke blive ved med at lade stå til. #dkpol Leder i @Netavisen_Pio piopio.dk/hvad-det-faglige-h…

LA har - med rette - kritiseret venstrefløjens militante "from the river to the sea" retorik og manglende kritik af terrorbevægelsens Hamas. Her er det så højreekstremisme og etnisk udrensning på Balkan der giver "puls" og "lugter af gran, blod, frost og sex" #dkpol

Hvorfor er alle københavnske medier NIMBY-medier? Er der ingen andre visioner for vores hovedstad end brakmarker og parkeringspladser?

Getting to Denmark open.substack.com/pub/persua…