A trading veteran since 1988, teaching traders to master market flow through relentless persistence and emotional discipline.

Joined March 2016
5,384 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
You can learn as many setups as you want... but until you LEARN to EXIT losing trades you will be stuck in "TRADERS HELL" Remember this... the more you lose in a trade, the less objective you become. EXITING a losing trade quickly clears your head and restores your objectivity.
76
376
This is what process trading looks like… you follow what works… what you tested… NOT WHAT YOU THINK.
1
10
512
Trading is easy…you follow a set a rules which you have tested so you know what to expect. That doesn’t mean the next 7 trades will be winners. You build an account by process. It means you know to expect from your rules. You might be wrong on the next 7 trades. Can you handle 7 losses in a row? If not you have not tested your rules on 1,000 trades. Testing your rules will show you what you can expect on the next 7, 8 9 or even 10 trades… Nobody does this because they are obsessed with the next trade. Where the fuck did you get this obsession? Trading is NOT dependent on the last outcome, you created this obsession with your outcome… and this is exactly what will fuck you on your trading results. Trading is NOT about winning on the next trade… You DO NOT need a high percentage of winning traders in order to be a profitable trader. It’s not whether you’re right or wrong on your trades, but how much money you make when you’re right versus how much you lose when you’re wrong. Why doesn’t anybody get this… what the fuck is going on with your brain ??? Your thinking that you need to WIN the next trade is exactly what’s killing your trading results. Winning percentage is the worst and least important number in your trading results. Fuck me, why can’t anybody see this ??? High percentage traders never win at trading because they don’t understand this simple concept. Fuck’em let them bleed out…
1
8
1,166
NOBS TRADES 🇺🇸 retweeted
I met this dude in a random cigar lounge in Dubai. Bro was sitting at a table with 3 of the most beautiful women I've ever seen. Had a $650,000 watch. Turns out he's a trader. He told me how much he makes a year. Dude, I didn't even know it was possible to make that much money trading. Asked him about the strategy he uses. Broheim said: ''I use 3 EMAs.'' ''That's it.'' ''I won't tell you anything else, though.'' Apparently... his rules are so simple, he was afraid I could replicate his exact trading strategy if he told me anything more. I did not insist. Bro uses 3 EMAs and makes 100X more than 99% of traders. HUGE LESSON IN THAT.
13
7
102
7,590
Listen and Learn…

2
13
1,118
Listen to this … here is what he realized after 25 years of trading: x.com/TradingComposur/status…

2
5
635
Here is the key to Trading: It’s not whether you’re right or wrong on your trades but how much money you make when you’re right versus how much you lose when you’re wrong”.
1
3
10
713
This why the NUT concept works, you don’t stay at a the table or trade the market all day… because you will give back your profits. Not only that, you will get to a point where your mental energy will start to dissipate because of the energy being used by your GREED. Pick a number, get it, and get the fuck off the screen. x.com/AsiaCritic/status/2051…

2
11
754
Pax is right, if you’re trying to predict markets you’re well on your way to being one of the 85% of failures in the trading business. Good traders don’t give a shit where the market goes. It’s not needed to be profitable. It’s how well you ride your winners. Fuck production and follow your process ( which means follow your rules. Did you test your process ( Did you follow the rules you tested ) No, and that’s exactly why you have no idea of what to expect in your trading. You’re going to have more losing trades than winners. Get that through your head. Have a game plan to address this, otherwise you are wasting time AND MONEY.
If you are a trader, STOP trying to predict markets and stop making calls. Nobody cares. Be prepared for both sides. Have a plan everyday and execute it. That plan needs to be consistent, repeatable and scalable. Start with a myopic view on an intraday basis and look to widen your view when the price action has continuation.
4
9
1,247
NOBS TRADES 🇺🇸 retweeted
Lance Breitstein who is featured in the upcoming Market Wizards The Next Generation book comments on a widespread misconception.
THE "CONSISTENTLY PROFITABLE" SKILL GAP & THE MYTH OF SUPPLEMENTAL INCOME FROM TRADING For many new traders or part-time traders, there is this pervasive belief that with some time and effort, they'll be able to make "just" a few grand per month to supplement their income. Or they "don't want to aim big, they just want to replace their current salary via trading so they can have more freedom." This is because people mistakenly believe that trading is like most other jobs, rather than it being a winner-take-all performance endeavor more akin to becoming a professional athlete. 99.9% of athletes will never make a dime professionally. There is no market demand for your average high school or college player. To even make league minimum in the NBA, you are still in the .0001% of basketball players. There is no such thing as just deciding to casually make a few grand as a pro athlete. Think about what it takes for someone to make $50k/yr as a golfer? The skill gap to earn an income or make the league minimum is crazy to comprehend. The analogy I gave with @AT09_Trader was the story of Brian Scalabrine. Even though Brian Scalabrine “sucked” in the NBA, he would absolutely annihilate 99.9% of the people calling him trash. He once said the famous line that he’s closer in skill to LeBron James than his haters are to him, and that line perfectly explains trading. The gap between unprofitable and elite looks massive from the outside, but the real canyon is between unprofitable and making any amount of money consistently. People look at a trader making $1M a year and think that’s a different species. They assume someone doing $100k a year is basically the same as the guy still blowing accounts, just with better luck. That’s like saying Scalabrine and your friend who plays pickup on Tuesdays are basically equal because neither is LeBron. Going from $0 to consistently profitable is the hardest jump in trading. You CANNOT just casually make a few grand per month or supplement income part-time. The skill level needed to consistently make ANY AMOUNT trading is the equivalent of being in the league. A trader who can pull $100k a year out of the market is not “kind of good.” They have competency in finding edge, executing trades, handling their psychology and risk management, and are competing in the league. From there, scaling to $300k, $500k, even $1M is usually a function of size, capital, and refinement, not a complete identity shift. But the trader still stuck at breakeven or red? They’re not one tweak away from $100k. They’re not “basically there.” They’re still trying to prove they belong on the court at all. The uncomfortable truth is this: the distance between $0 and $100k is far greater than the distance between $100k and $1M. One requires becoming a professional. The other simply just requires becoming a more refined one. My confidence in taking a trader from $100k to $1m is probably 10x higher than my confidence in taking a trader from $0 to $100k.
7
12
204
40,922
NOBS TRADES 🇺🇸 retweeted
Be like Richard Dennis: > Started trading with just $1,600 borrowed from family. > Created a simple, rules-based trend-following system. > Had only a 20% win rate, but his winners were astronomical. > Ignored opinions, predictions, and market noise. > Focused only on price action and discipline. > Took losses quickly and let winners run. > Trusted systems over emotions. > Accepted drawdowns as part of the game. > Built wealth by following rules, not instincts. > Turned that $1,600 into over $200 million in about 10 years. > Believed trading was a skill that could be taught. > Trained the famous “Turtle Traders”. > Turned complete beginners into extremely profitable traders. > Was admired and respected by every trader on the planet. > Died a legend who will never be forgotten.
13
65
550
33,931
Long read but worth studying 👍
Study why every expansion candle has a small wick Study why the market reverses at 6:00 AM every morning Study why correlated assets stop moving together right before a reversal Study why the profitable traders only take 2 trades per day from one gap Study why your "perfect setup" at a key level still gets you wicked out Once you understand the mechanics behind each of these, you'll realize the market has been showing you the answer every single day. You just weren't looking at the right thing Let me break each one down because most traders read lists like this and never actually think about the answers: "Why does every expansion candle have a small wick?" Because the wick is the manipulation phase and the body is the expansion phase. A candle only has so much time. If it spends half its time manipulating - forming a large wick - it doesn't have enough time left to expand. That's why expansion candles always have small wicks. Small wick = little time wasted in manipulation = maximum time for the body to form. This is candle profiling. Before you even look at a setup, look at the current candle's wick. If the 4-hour candle you're trading within has a large wick, it's not going to expand. It's a reversal candle. The next candle will expand. If it has a small wick, you're aligned with expansion. Trade it. This one filter eliminates half your losing trades because you stop trying to catch expansion inside candles that don't support it But wick size alone isn't enough. HOW the candle forms matters even more. A bullish expansion candle opens low first. That's the fluid motion - open, low, high, close. If it opens high first and then opens low, that's too much time wasted. The profile doesn't support expansion even if the wick is small. You need both: small wick AND opens in the right direction. When you have both, you're trading the highest probability candle possible "Why does the market reverse at 6:00 AM every morning?" Because 6:00 AM is the opening of the second 4-hour candle of the day. And if the previous 4-hour candle - the London session - already reversed, then this new candle's job is to continue This is session profiling. If the previous session reversed, the next session continues. If Asia reversed, London continues. If London reversed, New York continues. The market rotates between reversal and continuation across sessions every single day The 6:00 AM candle is the trigger. If it sweeps a key level and closes back inside the range - reversal day confirmed, expect continuation at 9:30. If it expands through a level with momentum - trend continuation day, only trade in that direction The traders making $30k /month check this one candle at 6:00 AM and already know the direction before 9:30 opens. The traders losing money show up at 9:30 and "react to price action." One has a script. The other is guessing "Why do correlated assets stop moving together right before a reversal?" Because institutions can't hide across two markets simultaneously. They can fake a breakout on NQ. They can engineer a stop hunt on ES. But they can't make both assets commit to the same fake move at the same time When NQ makes a new high but ES doesn't - one of them is lying. That divergence is called SMT. Smart Money Technique. It's a crack in correlation that tells you the move is fake before price confirms it Every single reversal in the market - every single one has some form of SMT before it happens. One asset sweeps a level. The other refuses to follow. That refusal is institutions telling you they're done buying. They just needed the liquidity from that final sweep to fill their sell orders A one-stage smt is good. A two-stage smy is the highest probability setup in the market. Stage one: SMT at the key level. Stage two: strength switch - the asset that was stronger closes weaker. When you have both stages, the reversal is confirmed before it even happens on the chart This is why single-chart traders get destroyed. The answer to every fake breakout is on the chart right next to the one they're staring at. They just never open it "Why do profitable traders only take 2 trades per day from one gap?" Because the market only produces 1-3 high probability entries per session. Everything else is noise that looks like a setup After a reversal is confirmed - whether by session profiling, SMT, or candle closure - price expands away. That expansion creates fair value gaps. Those gaps are the ONLY entries worth taking But not just any gap. The gap has to be within the upper half of the previous candle's range if you're bullish, or the lower half if you're bearish. Why? Because if price retraces past the equilibrium of the previous candle, it forms a large wick. Large wick = no expansion. Your trade is dead before it starts So you mark the equilibrium. You find the gap within that range. You wait for price to pull back into it. You confirm with SMT or a swing formation. You enter. Stop behind the gap. Target the next external liquidity That's 1 trade. Maybe 2 if the day gives you a continuation opportunity off a second gap later in the session The traders taking 8 trades per day are entering gaps that aren't aligned with the higher timeframe candle. They're trading gaps deep in the range that don't support expansion. They're entering before the SMT confirms. And they're giving back their morning by 2pm 2 trades from the right gap in the right candle beats 8 trades from random gaps every single time "Why does your perfect setup at a key level still get you wicked out?" Because you're entering at the LOCATION without waiting for the CONFIRMATION The key level is where the trade happens. The V-shape is what confirms the trade actually works Every real reversal prints the same signature on the lower time frame: aggressive expansion into the key level, sharp displacement candle in the opposite direction, fair value gap forms, price expands away. That's the V-shape. Expansion in. Displacement out. Gap. Continuation When the V-shape is there, the reversal is real. When it's not there - when price just drifts into your level and sits there with overlapping candles and no displacement - the reversal is fake. You're about to get wicked out But there's another reason your "perfect level" fails: it's not actually relevant. A swing high with three failure swings stacked right above it isn't a reversal point. It's a speed bump. Price is going to take all of them. The relevant high is the extreme - the one with no failure swings above it, with valid separation from the previous swing You need relevant levels V-shape confirmation. Level without confirmation = wicked out. Confirmation without a relevant level = low probability. Both together = the highest probability entry the market offers Every answer above points to the same system: Profile the candle to know IF you should trade. Profile the session to know WHICH DIRECTION. Use SMT to confirm the reversal is REAL. Enter the gap that's ALIGNED with the higher timeframe candle. Confirm with the V-SHAPE on the lower timeframe. Target the next RELEVANT level with no failure swings blocking it That's not five different strategies. That's one framework with five filters. Each filter eliminates a category of losing trades. Stack all five and you're left with 1-2 trades per day that have the highest probability of any setup in retail trading Study these five questions deeply and you'll understand more about market mechanics than traders who've been staring at charts for 5 years without knowing what they're looking at The market answers these questions every single morning. You just have to learn to read it I teach all five filters with live examples inside my free Discord. Link in bio ( if you think you're a good fit to work fully private with me and you're not broke - DM me "SYSTEM" for 1-on-1 coaching)
2
4
1,434
RT @NOBStrades: What separates winning traders from losing traders? It's not education, it's not secrets, it's not intelligence. It's n…
3
RT @NOBStrades: When you work a 9 to 5 job, you get paid for your time. When you work for yourself as a trader... You get paid for you…
5
Steven Goldstein is absolutely right about this concept and I talked about this today in the trading room… read this:
Loss aversion is real: the pain of a loss far outweighs the joy of an equal gain. We’re wired this way for survival, but in trading, this instinct is destructive. 🧵 The market has ebbs and flows. If you gain 20% then drop back to flat, you’ll feel worse than if you’d never gained at all. That pain triggers an urge to interfere—changing sizes, moving stops, or abandoning the plan. The real skill isn’t just your system; it’s ‘not drifting’ away from the system that is part of your process. Look at Rory McIlroy at the Masters. He slipped from the lead to 4th in the final round, but he didn’t flinch. He didn’t tinker or panic. By staying the course while others crumbled under pressure, he secured back-to-back Green Jackets. 🏆 He didn’t change his process, he was able to stay with the system of play that works for him. Your system is what you measure, but your ‘process’ is YOU. It’s how you react, how you hold yourself, and how you refuse to let biology break your discipline. Master your process, or the pain will master you.
3
6
1,210
NOBS TRADES 🇺🇸 retweeted
Replying to @JacobBeckerman
Today was a bad day. It had multiple stop outs on wicks and this is exactly why I tell people to have a well funded account. Micros = $5,000 E-Mimi = $20,000 You are going to experience multiple stops and need to be able to sustain losses. At 8 losing trades you need a 240 tick swing in order to pay the losses and to achieve your 80 tick target. The first runner we had made 350 ticks. You could have had 11 losses and made your nut and been done BEFORE the 350 tick was achieved. Most traders can’t sit through this, that’s why I have them TEST before they trade. Know what to expect before committing any capital. Almost 90% of traders never do the testing and this is why they never produce profits.
2
4
831
Trying to avoid losing trades is a not a way to approach markets. Nobody knows which trades are going to work. Stop trying to figure that part out and you will be well ahead of most traders. I’ve watched traders try to buy lows and sell highs for over 4 decades, it’s a suckers game and most new traders fall into this TRAP. A perfect example is somebody I follow who’s teaching his kid to trade. I will post it here from this morning…
2
8
926
This is the post I was talking about: his kid has the same thinking… he trades perfect for 3 weeks and then gets FUCKED in one day and then gives back a large chunk of his original capital. If he would have gone back and tested his rules he would have been prepared for the day when this happens.
So....My Eldest Son been trading alot, been getting into this insane game, learning that options is a con game and been trading the futures of late - He been jumping the Micros on #NQ_F and was doing Brilliantly until....yesterday😃 I let him hang himself.....hes been doing the scalp strategy where if it gets too overbought or over sold he jumps in and goes size. I told him there is going to be a point where that oversold or over bought is going to get even more oversold and over bought. He said meh....it "always" reverses. So ...3 weeks of awesome gains (and I mean he was making some really good bank) was vaporized and a good chunk of his original capital. He was like...I never seen 7 bars off the 30 min go one way. I'm like welcome to Hell....You learned your first lesson....you are not as smart or smarter than the market. You had no respect for the market and this is how it humbles you. Also.....8 months of real experience does not make you an expert.....many more traps to hunt you and you will feel pain (his face went blank). As my many mentors told me - STFU and learn, best way to learn is the hard way and hopefully you learned something today. #Trading
1
7
1,537
I get people looking for new setups all the time… WHY??? I just told you in my last few post about the 8 period EMA… even a simple 8 period moving average will do the same thing. People get so sucked into the Bull-Shit of order flow looking for answers. The answer is right in front of your face, follow the 8 EMA. It never misses any major moves during the trading session. Follow its direction… How hard is that ??? Did anybody test it? Did anybody go back and look at it on a 1-minute chart ??? No, because you think the market is more complicated. Go back and look at your losing trades which side of the 8 EMA were you on ??? It never misses any major moves and further more it catches GREAT moves. Now, does it have losing trades ? YES. You might have 6, 7 or even 8 losses in a row… who gives a shit ? If you have a well funded account: $5,000 for Micros $20,000 for E-minis What do you care if you have 8 losses in a row? Test it using 20 tick stops or even 49 tick stops. Most of you are trying to avoid losing trades and this is what kills your trading. OrderFlow is nothing more than a justification for your trades. It provides answers to your losses. It doesn’t help you trade better, but all the assholes selling will have you believe otherwise. Go with the FLOW. If your placing trades against the 8 EMA you’re going to be the long term loser. I have a new trader that came into the trading room 10 weeks ago and is consistently profitable 3 weeks after joining the room. How ??? Because he threw out all the bullshit and listened to the 8 EMA and never trades against it. Does he win on every trade… NO. He takes losing trades every day… but he sticks to the plan and trades for his daily NUT or target. 🎯 If you want perfection, keep using OrderFlow maybe you’ll find it, but for fucks sakes… Great traders are not perfectionists, they want profits and to trade well. If your trading is not profitable, it’s probably because you’re a perfectionist.
1
4
44
3,800
The longer you trade the longer you reach for simplicity. Complex trading only makes things more complex. Where you learn is from your drawdowns. Trading out of drawdowns is where you grow as a trader… and where see what works and what doesn’t work. Most traders will just stop because of the pain of losing (money, face or worse the humiliation of not following rules). Testing your rules teaches you humility. To accept the losses and learn what you did right and what you did wrong. Early in my career I used to record my trades on paper and each week I would review them… this was a form of testing. If you don’t review your trades, you can’t possibly know what is going wrong. I call out trade stats each day and people will say how do you know this? Simple, after you had your ass kicked in over 10 or 20 years you start to see patterns and they repeat every day. These pattern allow you to form discipline in the markets. You can recognize three attempts in one direction and you’re wrong. Fade the trade. See what happens. These things can be coded and then you go back and look at the probability. Your brain is always thinking this way but if you’re too caught up in the moment, you miss this valuable information. This is where emotional discipline comes in and you have to review your rules. If you make changes… you have to test them first. Well, if I just keep firing away what happens? You start to see how small drawdowns turned into blown accounts. You have to record all your trades or you’ll never see when and when you went on TILT and just start throwing money away. Right down your RULES and then test them on 1,000 trades. Don’t bend them and don’t alter them at all. You will see what. works. If you change ANY of the rules while your testing your just fucking with the system to Appease-your brain. Most people never get to this stage of testing their rules and this is why they are stuck in constant discovery mode. Constant discovery mode is where you are chasing indicators, systems and setups. It’s an endless cycle of perfectionism.
3
20
1,268