Type a sentence. Get a working app. Public beta is live. nullshot.ai

The thing people get wrong about vibe coding is they think it's only good for toy projects. It's not. People are shipping real things from a chat: - internal tools their team actually uses every day - the niche app no startup will ever build because the market is too small - a clone of the SaaS they were paying way too much for - the side project that's been sitting in their notes app for two years - a quick dashboard to stop living inside spreadsheets The bar isn't "can I build a startup." It's "is this annoying enough that I want it gone." Most of the time, that's a ten-minute build. What's the thing you keep meaning to make?

World Cup is live. Someone vibe code a quick predictions app so we can find out who actually knows football and who's just guessing.

I like the idea of not having the basic knowledge of coding, yet I'm able to bring my ideas to life. That's what @Nullshot_ai does. You prompt, and it builds. I described a grief memory website called "REMEMBER ME". Just prompted through what I wanted and It built it. Go check it out for yourself: rememberme.nullshot.dev. To get started with your own builder journey, visit Nullshot.ai. 📽🔻

You don't need permission to ship anymore. That's new. Act like it.

4 prompts to run when your build feels stuck: 1. "What's the smallest thing I can ship today?" Stuck usually means scope. This prompt drags you back to what's actually shippable. → If the answer is "nothing today," that's the signal. Cut something. 2. "What would a user do in the first 30 seconds?" You've been staring at the build. They haven't. → Forces you out of the maker's chair and into the first-time view. Most stuck builds are stuck because the first 30 seconds don't make sense yet. 3. "What's one thing to remove?" Not add. Remove. → Stuck builds are almost always too full, not too empty. The prompt that adds a feature is the easy one. The prompt that cuts one is the useful one. 4. "Describe what this app does in one sentence, as a user." You've been inside it for hours. The AI hasn't. → If the one-sentence answer surprises you, the build has drifted. If it matches, you're closer than you think and the stuck is in your head. Stuck isn't a building problem. It's a clarity problem. These prompts give it back.

Build it. See it. Tell it what's wrong. Watch it fix itself. Ship it.

Started with a simple idea: “what if I build a classic arcade basketball🏀 machine?” Built on @nullshot_ai with vibe coding: - drag to shoot - arcade booth UI - score timer - polished 2D shooter feel Play it here: dev-beabdfbb-9660-4e72-81c3-…

Someone's about to spend their weekend building the thing they've been talking about for six months. Could be you.

Two completely different ways to build an app: The hard way: > set up the stack yourself > wire the backend > fight with config > deploy and pray The vibe-coded way: > describe it in plain English > watch Nullshot build full-stack > iterate by chatting > ship the same day

The only thing between your idea and a real product is a conversation. Tried out @Nullshot_ai and built a working app just by talking @Nullshot_ai is changing the game. Check out the workflow in the video

Want to build a business? 4 questions to ask first: 1. Who is this for, specifically? Not "founders" or "creators." → One person you can name, with a job and a problem. If the user is everyone, the build is for no one. 2. What's the one thing they do here? Every app has a core action. Most builds blur it across three. → Name the single action. Everything else is in service of that action, or it's cut. 3. What does a good first week of users look like? Not month one. Not at scale. Week one. → Five real users doing the core action twice each is a real answer. "Some traction" isn't. 4. What's the smallest version that's still the product? Not the MVP. The version where if you removed one more thing, it'd stop being the thing. → That's what you build first. Decide the rest after you've seen it run. Spec questions, not feature questions. Get these right, and the build writes itself.

You don't need a bigger idea. You need to know what you're actually building.

Interactive product timelines, made simple.

You've described your idea to four people. Describe it to Nullshot instead.

Name a better feeling than this. I'll wait.

If the future is anything like what we’re shipping on Nullshot right now, we’re all gonna be fine.

4 reasons your AI-built app feels generic (and the fix for each): 1. It looks like every other AI build Inter, slate-grey, one blue accent, rounded corners. → Pick one display font with personality, one accent colour, and commit to both. Generic is what happens when nothing on the page was chosen on purpose. 2. The copy is placeholder copy "Welcome to [app]." "Get started." "Learn more." → Rewrite every button and header like a real product wrote it. "Get started" is filler. "Build your first one" is a product. 3. The flow is the default flow Sign up, dashboard, empty state, tutorial. → Skip the dashboard. Drop people into the core action on screen one. If the flow feels like every other app, it is one. 4. The empty state does nothing First-time user lands, sees a blank page and a " New" button. → The empty state is your most-seen screen. Use it. Show what a filled version looks like, invite the first action, make it the best-designed screen in the app. Generic is a series of small defaults. Picking on purpose fixes most of them.

If you could build an agent to handle one thing you do every day, what would you hand off first?