TL;DR: We need a fairer way to reduce remaining Sybils and better reward real long-term supporters. Let’s discuss openly and figure it out together. Full context below: This week has been packed with travel and flights, so I saw this tweet much later than I should have. Thank you for your patience. I hear you, and truly, our goal is the same: the long-term growth and fairness of the entire ecosystem. From the very beginning of the airdrop, we tried to remove as many Sybil attackers as possible. But many still slipped through, and we watched thousands of accounts combine allocations and dump large amounts of tokens. We couldn’t simply ignore something that directly threatened the people who genuinely support this project. At the same time, logic-based Sybil filtering is never perfect, and yes, some innocent users were impacted. We take that seriously. Our whole team sat together and manually reviewed tens of thousands of accounts, but achieving perfect fairness in a process like this is extremely difficult. And now, with the remaining airdrops coming, we know there will still be Sybil-type accounts mixed in. So the real question becomes: how do we protect and reward long-term contributors more, while reducing Sybil influence in a way that feels fair to everyone? Before talking about solutions, I want to highlight something important. Over the past few months, the community has shown what real support looks like. Each month about 2~3 million TAKE is claimed, and a significant portion keeps getting staked despite the overall market conditions. This month in particular, around 40% of all claimed tokens were staked. That level of commitment is a major reason the price held so strongly even in one of the toughest market conditions. The impact was visible immediately. From August to November, the price moved from 0.06 to 0.17 to 0.29 and then stabilized around 0.30 during an extremely harsh month for the entire crypto market. That stability didn’t come from your contribution. The token’s resilience is a reflection of the community’s behavior, and this month’s strong staking participation played a significant role in supporting the market. Moving forward, we have several very important announcements and developments prepared that we believe will push the ecosystem into its next stage of growth. And I genuinely want the people who care about this project to grow with us and benefit with us. Receiving the airdrop is your right. Selling is also your right. But we need to be honest about one thing. Among the wallets claiming each month, there are still multi-account farmers, bots, and extractive users intentionally dumping large amount of tokens at market price who slow down the project’s growth and take value away from real supporters. This isn’t about restricting anyone. It’s about making sure the value created by this ecosystem flows toward the people who actually contribute, support, and stay, rather than toward those who only extract from it. So I want us to discuss this openly. How do we further reduce the influence of these remaining Sybil-type accounts while strengthening rewards for genuine contributors? If we solve this correctly, the next phase of growth will be bigger, stronger, and shared by the people who truly care about OVERTAKE.

In five minutes I need full support from the community! 😁😁

Enough said, but if you’re truly building a retail-facing product, @SuiNetwork is the only option to deliver at scale. The market had a temporary setback, but the fundamentals haven’t changed, and the ecosystem will come back even stronger. Copped one of Sui’s top NFT projects.