World Renowned Oncologist says there’s no informed consent with mRNA tech, as the Nobel Prize winning Pseudouridine takes the stage.
The order looks backwards:
1. Inject billions.
2. Give them a Nobel Prize.
3. Publish a peer reviewed paper finding something unexpected.
@weldeiry - “It should be clear to everyone. Pseudouridine modified mRNA were used for the first time in the population... NEVER BEFORE.”
Months after Pseudouridine won the Nobel Prize, a peer reviewed paper was published saying this “upgraded” technology is leading to the production of “strange proteins in the body”.
Professor Clancy says: “No one knows what those proteins are doing”.
“The Nobel Prize in 2023 was given to two people for putting pseudouridine in a messenger RNA, to make it work better... within three months, a group in Cambridge found that 20% of readouts, and about 10% of people, had strange proteins circulating in their bodies, some of which have the capacity to form amyloid”
This is concerning on so many levels:
"No one knows what those proteins are doing"
Professor Robert Clancy: "the Nobel Prize in 2023 was given to two people for putting pseudouridine in a messenger RNA [but the] pseudouridine [was producing]—instead of a spike protein—something completely strange and different"
That Nobel Prize in 2023 meets a peer reviewed study from Cambridge, which might have outlined a mechanism behind why embalmers are seeing the "strange rubbery clots" in the deceased.
AND, the Yale evidence of persistent spike production of 709 x days, however that's happening, gives a cautionary but plausible amyloidogenic mechanism for abnormal proteins to be produced both acutely and for extended periods.
Professor Robert Clancy: "the Nobel Prize in 2023 was given to two people for putting pseudouridine in a messenger RNA, to make it work better"
"Within three months, a group in Cambridge found that 20% of readouts, and about 10% of people, had strange proteins circulating in their bodies, some of which have the capacity to form amyloid, which can cause dementia [and] they found this within weeks and months of people being vaccinated"
"They worked out that the mechanism was because the pseudouridine [was producing]—instead of a spike protein—something completely strange and different"