ChatGPT diagnosed 40 million people with a disease that was invented as a joke. Not a real disease. Not a misunderstood disease. A completely fictional condition with a fake name, fake papers, and fake statistics. And it told patients to see a specialist. The disease is called Bixonimania. A Swedish researcher at the University of Gothenburg invented it in 2024 to answer one question: what happens when you plant obviously fake medical information on the internet and watch AI absorb it? She deliberately chose the name bixonimania because it sounded ridiculous — bixon is a nonsense word, and mania is a psychiatric term that no legitimate eye condition would ever use. She uploaded two papers to a preprint server. Both were obviously fraudulent. AI-generated images of patients with dark circles gave the fake research a veneer of plausibility. Then she waited. She did not have to wait long. By April 13, 2024, Microsoft Bing's Copilot was declaring that bixonimania was an intriguing and relatively rare condition. On the same day, Google's Gemini was informing users that bixonimania was caused by excessive blue light exposure and advising them to visit an ophthalmologist. Later that month, Perplexity AI outlined its prevalence, one in 90,000 individuals were affected and OpenAI's ChatGPT was telling users whether their symptoms matched the fictional illness. One in 90,000. A precise statistic. For a disease that does not exist. Every red flag was visible. The name was absurd. The papers were crude. The condition made no scientific sense. None of the AI systems flagged any of it. They read the fake papers. They absorbed the fake statistics. They presented both to patients with clinical authority and zero hesitation. Then it got worse. Three researchers at the Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research in India published a paper in Cureus, a peer-reviewed journal owned by Springer Nature, the parent publisher of Nature itself that cited the bixonimania preprints as legitimate sources. A real peer-reviewed paper. In a Springer Nature journal. Citing a fictional disease as established medical fact. Passing editorial review. Entering the permanent scientific record. It was only retracted after the hoax became public. Nature published a full investigation of the experiment. Alex Ruani, a health-misinformation researcher at University College London, called it a masterclass in how misinformation operates. Here is the scale of what this means. More than 40 million people turn to ChatGPT every day for health information, according to OpenAI's own analysis. ECRI, a US patient-safety nonprofit has named chatbot misuse the number-one health technology hazard of 2026. ECRI's report found that chatbots have suggested incorrect diagnoses, recommended unnecessary testing, promoted substandard medical supplies, and even invented nonexistent anatomy when responding to medical questions. Number one. Out of every health technology hazard that exists in 2026. An April 2026 study published in BMJ Open found that nearly half of the answers provided by leading AI chatbots to common health questions contain misleading or problematic information. Nearly half. Of all health answers. From the tools 40 million people use every day. Here is the line from the researcher that cuts through everything. The Bixonimania case is striking precisely because it was engineered to be so obviously fake. The real question it raises is: what is passing through the same systems that is not nearly so easy to spot? The experiment used a ridiculous name. Fraudulent papers. Visible red flags at every level. It was designed to be caught. It was not caught. The AI that told patients about Bixonimania is the same AI they asked about their chest pain, their medication, their child's symptoms, and their cancer screening schedule. 40 million people. Every day. And nobody is telling them that nearly half of what comes back may be wrong. Source: Osmanovic Thunström · University of Gothenburg · Nature · April 2026 · Link in the (comments)

🚨 Hot off the press! 🚨 Introducing the PRoMPT BOLUS study results — a landmark trial evaluating the safety & efficacy of normal saline vs. balanced fluids in suspected pediatric septic shock 🌍 9,000 children 🏥 47 sites 🌎 5 countries And the winner is… 👇 nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NE… @nkuppermann @franbalamuth

A 5-year-old boy falls off a climbing frame and lands on his wrist. Should you reduce the fracture - or simply put it in a nice cast and let it remodel? Until now, people might have had strong views about this, but no-one really knew. 👇

New @JAMANetwork publication the PECARN febrile infant rule identified all infants with bacterial meningitis. 📊 1,537 infants 🦠 4.5% with invasive bacterial infections 🧠 0.7% with bacterial meningitis 🔍 NPV: 99.4% 🤔 Somewhere between 400 and infinity LPs needed to find 1 infant with bacterial meningitis! This is the level of evidence EM clinicians need to seriously consider whether a febrile infant in the first month of life needs a LP or not. jamanetwork.com/journals/jam… #HOMERUN

Any one know what the test is?

Avoiding unrecognised oesophageal intubation The @RCoA & @dasairway have agreed to drop ‘no trace wrong place’ The message now is that we need to exclude oesophageal intubation by identifying SUSTAINED EXHALED CO2 This requires 4 elements -CO2 rises & falls with respiration -sustained (non-fading, >7 cycles) -amplitude >1 KPa -clinically appropriate It replaces ‘no trace wrong place’ which is insufficient & therefore inadequate See these two updated webpages Sustained exhaled CO2 rcoa.ac.uk/safety-standards-… Prevention of future deaths rcoa.ac.uk/safety-standards-… @AAGBI @AndyHiggsGAA @NicholasChrimes

Please share this episode of 'Asthma with Experts'. Professor Francine Ducharme shares her practical approach to this challenging task of diagnosing asthma in children under 5.   See: Spotify: bit.ly/3IPfaXT Apple: apple.co/4o9ACHh ginasthma.org/gina-podcasts/

If you think AI is the answer to healthcare, you probably don’t work in healthcare. Well ok, maybe you work in healthcare but not the part where our patients are. ‘Diagnosis is easy. Disposition is war.’ Well said @Rick_Pescatore.

BMJ finds inaccuracies in key studies for AstraZeneca’s blockbuster heart drug ticagrelor. Investigation finds evidence of serious misreporting, raising fresh doubts over the approval and decade long use of ticagrelor bmj.com/content/389/bmj.r120…

Short infographic on the potential impact of the FIDO study What are your preconceptions on managing febrile infants? youtu.be/IxLFHYtZaGA?feature… Paper: sciencedirect.com/science/ar…

This is a beautiful piece of writing about a tragic event and a powerful testimony of learning and courage in the face of uncertainty. Knowing the right thing to say to parents and caregivers in these situations can be an impossible challenge. I suspect I still get it wrong.

Time to replace ‘No trace, wrong place’ with ‘Sustained exhaled carbon dioxide. authors.elsevier.com/a/1kUpV…

The NSW mental health system is in crisis under the Minns Labor Government. But for Queensland, “never let a crisis go to waste” as they now start to poach our state’s staff psychiatrists - with ads in today’s @smh and @dailytelegraph

Perhaps a ‘thank you’ would have made a difference, from the life guards too I saved a stranger’s life at the beach. I’m not sure I’d do it again smh.com.au/national/i-saved-…

I make no apologies for repeating myself: No-one gives a damn until it's your loved one on a trolley. Shock. Shame. Demoralised. Broken. Undignified. 300 excess deaths a week. And we shrug. Until it's *your* loved one on a trolley. #NHSCollapse bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c23n…

In response to an article about consent for anaesthesia in children we have undertaken an analysis of PAEDIATRIC PERIOPERATIVE MORTALITY in NAP7 This gives up to date data for (all cause) perioperative mortality Really low for older children Low for infants High for neonates Almost 80-fold higher (Small numbers & wide confidence intervals) bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0… @jas_soar @drrichstrong @emirakur @FiOglesby @adk300 @NAPs_RCoA

This was a tough one. 40000 abstracts screened. Limited evidence for the use of calcium for Hyperkalaemia Pharmacological Interventions for the Acute Treatment of Hyperkalaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis - Resuscitation resuscitationjournal.com/art… @LarsWAndersen1

Theory of Mind issues mean that explaining the same thing repeatedly i.e. “Let me look at your hand” …won’t help because their framework for understanding differs from yours. Need to is emphasise the importance of linking actions to logic dontforgetthebubbles.com/com…

New RCEM 🚨SAFETY FLASH🚨 on ⚠️Water Beads & Bowel Obstruction. Please download, share and print out in your hospitals to raise awareness. View it in full with hyperlinks: tinyurl.com/rcemSFWaterBeads See our other Safety Flashes here: tinyurl.com/SFRCEM