Majority Australian opinion:

The BBC spins this story very dishonestly. What does 'shadow fleet' actually mean? Well it means sanctioned by Western Governments. Such sanctions have no standing in international law, they are simply threats issued by Governments. They use 'international sanctions' to make them sound legal Under international law, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) all vessels - even foreign warships and submarines - have the right of unimpeded passage through the English Channel. There is a real danger here in that the more contempt the British Government shows for international law, the more it trashes the rights of foreign civilians, the more international law simply disintegrates and the greater risk they expose British citizens overseas to.

No one believes in the Australian Press Council Who had nothing to say about the mainstream media's lies about "beheaded babies" and "mass rape" used to "justify" a fucking genocide by Israel To paraphrase the inestimable Cathy Wilcox the Australian Press Council "... can fuck right off" michaelwest.com.au/vale-the-…

Yeah… about that….

So the LABOR Party used the phrase “DITCH THE WITCH” & “The Witch of Ipswich” against Pauline Hanson in 1994- 1997 & now that is used against them, all of a sudden it’s ‘sexist’. Leftists are the biggest sooks & hypocrites 🙄 “Do as we say, not as we do” they tell us.

The gutless wonders in the Coalition calling for One Nation Senators to be investigated are pure hypocrites. The fact is, there is no question over Senator Whitten's eligibility. Snowy Hydro is a public company, not a government department. The most questionable Senator in Parliament, Fatima Payman, holds Afghan citizenship. It's a case that still needs investigation and an answer. I tried to have her qualification to sit in Parliament under section 44 of the Constitution referred for an inquiry. The hypocrites in the Coalition joined with Labor and the Greens to kill that inquiry and make sure she was never investigated. If the Coalition didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any. I wish the Coalition would put as much effort into working together and fixing the country as they put into trying to take One Nation down.

Is there any chance, My brother, That you can could Hold My Hand For Henry. . .For Us. MGG

The scale of what the Telegraph has uncovered requires the country to stop and process it methodically. Between 2015 and 2021, more than £28 billion of British taxpayer money — through foreign aid payments and Covid emergency loans — was appropriated by terrorists, hostile foreign states and organised criminal networks. The money is described as “beyond reach.” Those who took it are “unpunished.” Russia received grants via state-linked companies. Islamic State received Covid loans. Chinese military-linked firms received research investment. And behind all of this sits a Cabinet Office report — the first government assessment ever to quantify this catastrophic leakage — that was deliberately suppressed to spare ministers embarrassment. Now consider the timeline. This covers six years spanning three Prime Ministers — Cameron, May, and Boris Johnson — and into the early Starmer era. It covers the 2015-2019 Conservative governments, the pandemic response, and the transition to Labour. Multiple Cabinets. Multiple Chancellors. Multiple foreign secretaries. All of them operating a foreign aid and emergency lending apparatus that — by the government’s own secret reckoning — channelled tens of billions to Britain’s worst enemies. None of the money recovered. None of the recipients punished. And the report — rather than triggering urgent cross-party accountability — was quietly buried. The public paid for this report. They paid for the £28 billion it documents. They were then deliberately denied the right to know either existed. If there is a cleaner definition of contempt for the electorate, it is hard to imagine.

A paedophile who changed gender while in prison for sexually abusing their own daughter as a child and sending explicit photos of her to perverts online has been quietly released back into the community. Claire Fox, 61, who was previously known as Clive Bundy, who has six kids, served just seven years of a 15-year jail sentence, before being settled into a tiny market town on the Welsh borders. Fox, who wears a black wig and floral dresses told neighbours, who knew nothing of fox's sordid past, that fox was an electrician from Bangor as they helped get settled into fox's new surroundings and helped furnish her flat. Fox arrived in a sheltered accommodation block for older people in a tiny town at the start of June. Fox was given new furniture, a television, printer, washing machine and crockery by the armed forces charity SSAFA because fox had once been in the Territorial Army. Fox’s release from prison has appalled the daughter Ceri-Lee Galvin, who bravely waived her right to anonymity, having been abused by her father for nine years from the age of eight. Revealing her astonishment, Ceri-Lee, 24, said: ‘My father is not a woman and I refuse to recognise him as such. He changed his gender in prison to make his life there easier. ‘But now he is out and already up to his usual tricks conning everyone he meets. ‘The fact he is now dressed as a woman makes him more dangerous as young girls are his thing and he has never shown any remorse. ‘My father is a highly manipulative man who has attended no sexual offender rehabilitation programmes, shown no remorse for what he has done and openly admits finding children attractive. ‘There have been no meetings I’m aware of to tell local schools about his presence, he has no tag and no curfew. He has just been put into this community and given all he could wish for – food, furniture and a home.’ Ceri-Lee, now a student paramedic, added: ‘I am in no way transphobic and I feel incredibly sorry for people who genuinely need to transition. They face stigma and worse because of cases like this. ‘But it should just not be an option for those convicted of sexual offences against children to suddenly say that they want to be a woman. ‘This only arose at the end of 2021 when he was due to be moved to an open prison but then had a fight with a fellow prisoner that was serious enough to stop the move. ‘That is when he went for the gender change – when he was almost 60, having been a macho man all his life and having had eight children and having never mentioned gender dysphoria before. ‘Now he is being indulged by everyone. The prison service gave him make-up and women’s clothes and now a charity for the armed forces have provided him with so much stuff when all he did was a short stint in the Territorial Army in his 20s.

A dynomite telling telling of our story in such a short amount of time. The story NO other member of Congress will even listen to.

JERSEY JAILED THE MAN WHO TRIED TO SAVE ITS CHILDREN Stuart Syvret @StuartSyvret was Jersey's Health Minister. In 2007 he started asking uncomfortable questions about what was happening to children in the island's care homes. He said he was sacked for whistleblowing. Jersey said he was sacked for his behaviour. That's the kind of framing you get when the institution decides the story. Syvret had been collecting his own evidence since 2006. In May 2008 he made a formal complaint to police claiming senior civil servants had perverted the course of justice by covering up abuse in care homes. So what happened to him? His house was raided. His computers and papers were taken. He was hit with a superinjunction, a secret gag order that was later exposed by UK Parliament, and imprisoned three times in connection with his efforts to expose what he described as horrific crimes across the island. The Independent Jersey Care Inquiry eventually confirmed that children in care on the island endured 553 offences between 1947 and 2004. Most occurred at the notorious Haut de la Garenne children's home. The inquiry concluded that survivors were left with devastating and life-long consequences. A constant theme in the inquiry report was the "Jersey Way" - a culture of ignoring and downplaying uncomfortable issues, which allowed abuse to continue without full investigation. One UK judge called Syvret "a thorn in the side of the Jersey establishment." A Liberal Democrat MP accused Jersey's judiciary of misusing the Data Protection Act to silence critics. Syvret eventually left Jersey fearing for his life, having received death threats for years. He ended up in an undisclosed location in the United States. His conclusion, years later: the obstructions to the original police investigation were "astonishing." And those who blew the whistle paid the price while the system stayed intact. Think about that. The man who raised the alarm about child abuse on a British Crown Dependency got jailed, gagged, and exiled. If this case matters to you, share it. These children deserved better than this. Sources: @BBCJersey @BBCNews @JEPnews @guardian

🚨 WTF?! Top congressman Thomas Massie confirms US fighter jets were launched to save the USS Liberty from the Israeli attack, but Washington inexplicably recalled them. The Pentagon intentionally abandoned their own men for 17 hours to protect Zionist regime! Total betrayal.

Look at Japan. Women walk home alone at midnight. Children ride trains alone to school. Lost wallets return with the cash inside. This is normal in Japan. This was normal everywhere, once. Japan did not change. The world changed. Defend what your ancestors built.🇯🇵

What the hell is wrong with that 20% ?

RT @SenSHenderson: When Queensland psychiatrists Dr Andrew Amos and Dr Jillian Spencer publicly raised concerns about the harms of gender m…

I have a simple question to ask on X. Why are mainstream journalists and media outlets not examining the public evidence regarding Andy Burnham's role in the cover up of the Pakistani Rape Gangs during his tenure as Greater Manchester Mayor? Serious questions have been raised by whistleblower Maggie Oliver. The public deserves to know why Burnham promoted an Assurance Review in Oldham described as 'nothing short of a cover up'. Put aside my personal views for a moment. There are two possibilities here. Either Burnham and his so called team of experts set about delivering a sham review and protecting Labour Party politicians, council official and police officers, or concerns raised by a respected whistleblower are also baseless. Journalists should be examining the facts and timeline in detail so voters can judge for themselves. Not one has. Why? With Burnham set to become Prime Minister, why is the evidence of his role in the Pakistani Rape Gang cover up being ignored? The evidence is available for scrutiny, yet as the election approaches, there appears to be little media pressure to address this head-on. Just what do you think will happen once he becomes MP?

🚨BREAKING | Andy Burnham says that Israel's murderous assault on Gaza is NOT a genocide. The aspiring PM added that he "can't judge" Israel for what they have done. (Via @guardian)

My friends and supporters have suggested a fundraiser to help cover some costs going ahead.. with my workplace being doxxed online, then getting fired, getting legal help with that, whilst also helping to support me over a time I’m without a job. So here we are: givesendgo.com/support-lisa-… Thank you so much. And thank you to those who have already sent money to my “buy me a coffee”. I very much appreciate all the support 🙏 It means more than you may know.

RT @OpsHQs: The Israeli ambassador to Europe is protesting the spread of this image. Let it spread all over the world. 🌍🔥" t.co/ndU…

The Nowak case clearly highlights that we need to stop treating racism as an ~infinite evil, not because Nowak was racist (no evidence of this) but because any time you create a social superweapon like accusations of racism are now, it’ll be misused horribly. What is racism? Ask 10 people and you’ll get 12 opinions. Historically, it meant someone who treats people badly in interpersonal interactions because of their race. Which is just, like, kinda annoying and slightly boorish. It’s not the apocalypse. There are many personal traits that are equally or more annoying. Now the definition has been ludicrously expanded to include a bunch of things even less objectionable than that, including belief in very plausible scientific claims and policy preferences that were near-universal for almost all of human history. Racism just isn’t a big deal. We have to take it off its pedestal. If Nowak had said something racist, it would morally change exactly nothing about the horror of what happened to him. He didn’t, but I feel over-focusing on that distracts from the fact that it wouldn’t matter if he had. Murder is worse than racism. Hell, shoplifting is worse than racism. Enough. Who cares.