Crypto Vol | Founder Pelion Capital (FO) | Deribit Forensics | AD Advisor. 30 yr Options | Ex-MS-Head of Trading desk. Tweets my opinion not financial advice.

Joined April 2018
357 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
19 Mar 2020
1) My threads are written with options specialists in mind. However, I also appreciate and am humbled by the large number of followers that are interested in the commentary as a process to learn about and interpret option market activity. This thread will hopefully help a little.
51
238
1,038
Jun 8
When I engage with the current public versions of AI, I am constantly disappointed. When I read other people's 'created' articles, tweets, and threads I am bored with the depth of true understanding. It reminds me vividly of one of my favourite film scenes from Good Will Hunting - youtube.com/watch?v=qM-gZint…

2
22
2,437
TS retweeted
The VIX is 16.5 btw
19
2
126
14,048
TS retweeted
I valued SpaceX for its IPO a few weeks ago, with minimal information and a promise to revisit the valuation, when the prospectus was made public. The prospectus is public, the offering price has been set and my update is up and running. bit.ly/4ocgzbV

73
434
2,965
1,050,470
TS retweeted
CEOs walking into work after realizing that the AI tokens are going to cost more than the employees they fired
179
1,238
16,881
789,430
TS retweeted
The AI Trading Assistant made me $5,000 today (and counting) on $ZEC and $NEAR Whilst I was having a coffee with a friend ☕️
7
9
62
2,739
TS retweeted
1) In the last report I rang alarm bells after large clips of BTC 75k and ETH 2100 Puts were bought; BTC ETH fell 10%. These Puts expired yesterday and were not rolled. Just before US close, a clip of ~5k July 80k Calls was sold. Upside yield comfort, and Vol further pressured.
4
2
26
2,342
TS retweeted
mkt close - 29 may 26 Huge rebalancing flows towards the close. $NVDA was sold down from 217 to 211 while $MSFT and $ORCL were bidded up. Essentially semis were sold while software was bid. $SMH vs $IGV. In other areas, $NBIS and the rest of the neocloud space were hit in initial trading, however they have recovered their gains for $NBIS and $CRWV, In particular if compute is constrained, this firms up the narrative for both $CRWV and $NBIS to make a move upwards. $NBIS was recently unveiled as Leopold's pick - does that give it plot armour? I would want to see any dips below 200 to quickly get eaten. $NOK hit the 14.6 support and bounced up. This name has seen alot of shilling in the 16s area - hence not surprised to see some profit taking on it. Interesting however that the derivs flow on this continues to be strong. Would expect this and $BB to continue to rerate upwards. Nuclear did not have much price action for the month, hence relatively unchanged on the rebal. For memory, late bids on $SNDK came into the picture, picking up the name and pushing it up by almost 3% in 10minutes of trading. $MU continues to trade just shy of $1000. IMO, we could see a rerun of semis led by $MU - this would probably trigger a retracement in $IGV and provide a dip for people to add exposure. software names i like - $ORCL, $CRM, $NOW, $FIG Happy weekend!
3
2
53
14,591
TS retweeted
This product is a gamechanger I’m telling youu
May 28
80% of my time in AI/Q/PAI/Space Stocks these days. One of the very few protocols I continue to utilize in crypto along side Hype/xyz etc is @pear_protocol Incorporating the best domain-trained agent in the space imo, combined with what essentially every large trader on here says they are doing - Pair trading, gives every opportunity to have been shorting many crap tokens and long momentum stocks. All this now with @agent_pear in TG with auto-execution. A whole host of products continue to be released by a team that is still building fast. Just a great overlooked product with what I believe is the highest percentage of profitable traders, because it's made easy.
1
2
15
2,057
May 28
80% of my time in AI/Q/PAI/Space Stocks these days. One of the very few protocols I continue to utilize in crypto along side Hype/xyz etc is @pear_protocol Incorporating the best domain-trained agent in the space imo, combined with what essentially every large trader on here says they are doing - Pair trading, gives every opportunity to have been shorting many crap tokens and long momentum stocks. All this now with @agent_pear in TG with auto-execution. A whole host of products continue to be released by a team that is still building fast. Just a great overlooked product with what I believe is the highest percentage of profitable traders, because it's made easy.
So I finally got round to trying @pear_protocol ‘s updated AI Pear Trading Suite. In short: I’m fucking stunned. In TG I told it to scan all assets on HL and pick the pair trade it thinks will yield the best return in the next 8 hours. It found XMR/XLM, explained in detail why, gave me recommended SL and TP. But then it got silly… with 1 click it executed it, placed all orders and 150 seconds later the position had hit TP for $200. I was taking a piss and the agent took its own idea and used my money to make more money. I feel excited and emasculated and scared and curious all at once. Can’t wait to delve deeper into the reasoning it uses and see just how capable this thing can be. Pear team continue to build and ship like no one else in the space and to boot they’re running HYPE mystery box prizes for the first 150 people using this agent alongside the existing HyPear point season with HYPE rewards. If you’re not pair trading in this environment with all these perks, what the fuck are you even doing? 🍐
7
6
38
5,467
TS retweeted
Legendary stock picker @GavinSBaker ($4.1B AUM) dropped some insane bars on All In. "If you look at the valuations for all these AI [plays], they just can't all be accurate." "If the multiples on the power, cooling, optical names are correct, Nvidia and memory are going up a lot. If the multiples on Nvidia and memory are correct, everything else is probably going to underperform." "The AI market is cross-sectionally inefficient right now" Of his 10 largest positions, 8 are AI stocks. - $ALAB (8.99%) - $CIEN (6.4%) - $MU (6.26%) - $NVDA (5.31%) - $AMZN (4.84%) - $LITE (4.58%) - $GOOG (3.89%) - $COHR (3.66%)
43
131
1,992
486,382
TS retweeted
i understand we're only 45 mins in but premium traded: $MU $1.9bn SPX $1.7bn

ALT tha GIF

22
6
73
11,135
TS retweeted
"You're right." is starting to become the most disappointing thing I can read on a computer screen.
14
10
245
12,039
May 25
'...lessons learned' is always placed at the end of a failure; that's how we, as humans, develop. But, when many of those 'lessons learned' have been the composition and conclusion of previous failures by others in the same industry, I find it exasperating. It's why some bond funds wisely hired OG 90's traders. Some macro funds have on their board OGs that have traded through 2008 FC, 2001 TT, 1999-2000 Nasdaq, and further back still. Many of the top HFs engage battle-tested advisors. Broken-market experience is critical for funds running money. Making the same or similar mistakes that have been made before by others is pure madness as a CIO.
2
16
1,780
TS retweeted
May 24
bitcoin:native trading edges that have decayed: watching bitmex orderbook watching bitfinex longs/shorts buying when cobie tweets up only "orderflow" stuff "sentiment" listening to aggr SPX/NQ correlation onchain monitoring daily ETF flows not fully decayed yet: stalking saylor tailing option positioning IBIT gex/Deribit gex simple moving averages buying the rare huge liqs balls tingling
51
26
598
55,355
May 23
While you're enjoying your weekend sipping coffee or cocktails, someone is dealing with these short May29th expiring BTC 75k Puts and ETH 2100 Puts, both now in the money but close enough to have large gamma footprints.
1) A large purchase of BTC May29 75k Puts in isolation is a signal, but should not induce unease. But add a simultaneous outisized purchase of ETH May29 2100 Puts and alarm bells might ring. Net $500m notional, $6.5m premium, executed within a brief period as Spot neared lows.🧵
3
5
58
19,920
TS retweeted
The gamma trap: how traders extract real money from a strategy that's a long-run loser. ex-Tudor PM Tom Costello (@tcoste110) explains: "Gamma hedging is much more difficult than it looks. It's not simple." "You can sell options for the premium and make money 99 days out of 100. For 98 of those 99 days, you're sure you're brilliant." "You don't make much money every day. But you make it every day. So just multiply your size by 10,000. You think you've cracked the code." "You haven't cracked the code. You've compressed your risk. You've traded a fraction of a percent gain every day for a 150% loss on the 99th day." "Average it over years — you're a loser." "But on the way up, you get paid. Year one you get paid. Year two you get paid. Year three you lose more than you made in the last two." "Net loser overall. But you still got paid. Maybe you get fired, you go to another shop and do the same thing over again."
"I haven't seen a real new idea in trading in at least 15 years." Tom Costello (@tcoste110) ran money at Tudor, Moore Capital, and Caxton. Built one of the first NLP-driven equity systems in 2003. 20 years managing capital, never had a down year. "Comparing what a retail trader does to what a quantitative hedge fund does is like comparing driving a bus on the New Jersey Turnpike to winning a Formula One race." We cover: - His hot take: no genuinely new trading idea in 15 years — only better people doing the same things faster - Why everyone in quant finance is a genius — and why that makes you ordinary, not special - Crypto is "super smart guys cosplaying at finance" — built for retail, which is exactly why it's the easiest money in finance right now - Why AGI won't beat the hedge fund industry — all the readily-capturable alpha is already captured - The status trap: why the path that made Paul Tudor Jones a billionaire won't work for the kid trying to copy it in 2026 - His friend the investment banker who'd quit it all to run a 10-employee ambulance supply company worth $150M - Why excitement is "wildly overbid" in finance — and why wanting an exciting trading job is itself a disqualifier - The most honest end of the financial industry — and why the media has it exactly backwards Thanks so much to Tom for coming on Odds on Open! Highlights: 00:00 Intro 01:18 Building institutional credibility for early-stage managers 03:01 The Pareto distribution of hedge fund returns 04:25 Applying the Unified Field Theory of Finance to fair value 08:14 Trading against human incentives in a deterministic market 13:54 Why allocators don’t steal alpha from prospective PMs 25:16 Evaluating career edge in quantitative finance for 2026 30:48 Paul Tudor Jones and the art of game selection 33:42 Analyzing the economic viability of starting a new fund 35:16 Identifying common retail pitfalls: Mean reversion and arbitrage 38:55 Why there hasn't been a new trading idea in 15 years 50:33 Managing tail risk: Physics vs. deterministic financial distributions 59:10 Career pathing for PMs after a fund blow-up 1:07:53 SBF and FTX: Credibility vs. the "Founder-Genius" archetype 1:13:44 Establishing proof-of-concept through audited multi-year returns
5
14
177
59,483
May 18
Perspective/explainer for non-optional specialists on the Situational Awareness Fund 13F Notional Option positioning: eg $MU $6m notional shares (negligible), $422m notional Calls, $584m notional Puts. Sounds like more Puts, so bearish bias right? Stock trading $680. [Simplistically] If Call strike is $680, and Put strike is $300, then net delta exposure is bullish. Amount spent on Calls significantly greater than Puts. If Call strike is $1100, and Put strike is $680, then net delta exposure is bearish. Amount spent on Puts significantly greater than Calls. It depends which Strikes the Options relate to. The key here is that the 13F filing does not oblige Funds to state the Strike prices (or expiry, which adds more fun to the obsfuscation and permeabilities), so we just don't know what @leopoldasch is doing or trying to hide/make us believe.
1
24
1,582
TS retweeted
May 18
Unfathomably bad takes around this this morning and a good reminder of why 13F digging is mostly a waste of time. - March 31st we were in the heat of the Iran war, makes sense to put on hedges at the time. - Options exposure on 13F’s get quoted notionally, so as if it were 100 delta i.e all 100 shares per contract. - We have no way of knowing whether these were 5 delta convexity hedges and represented a fraction of what people are saying were billions in puts or whether they were ITM puts. - Further, outright shorts don’t get reported either. Too much noise associated with things that happened back in March that aren’t relevant now, we have no idea about his turnover in assets of trade frequency. A lot happened in the months of April and May, his positioning could be completely different. Making investment decisions for 80 vol assets based on data from months ago sounds like a good way to burn money. So don’t idolize people and develop Your own thesis for why you sell and own things.
🚨 LEOPOLD ASCHENBRENNER IS OFFICIALLY BETTING BILLIONS THAT THE AI HARDWARE BOOM HAS PEAKED. The exOpenAI researcher who was fired for warning that China could steal their AI models then turned $225 million into $5.5 billion in 12 months just filed his Q1 2026 13F with the SEC. One quarter ago he had $5.5 billion in disclosed equity exposure. As of March 31, 2026 that number is $13.67 billion. The portfolio nearly tripled in a single quarter across 42 positions. He initiated $7.46 billion in put options against every major semiconductor company between January 1 and March 31, 2026. None of these positions existed in his Q4 2025 filing. - SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF PUT: $2.04 billion - Nvidia PUT: $1.57 billion - Oracle PUT: $1.07 billion - Broadcom PUT: $1.01 billion - AMD PUT: $969 million - Micron PUT: $583 million - Taiwan Semiconductor PUT: $535 million - ASML PUT: $494 million - Intel PUT: $159 million For the past 18 months Aschenbrenner was betting only on electricity, memory, compute, and physical data center infrastructure. That made him one of the best performing fund managers in the world. And his long stock book still reflects that exact same thesis. - Bloom Energy: $878 million - SanDisk: $724 million - CoreWeave: $556 million - IREN: $401 million - Core Scientific: $389 million - Applied Digital: $320 million - Riot Platforms: $142 million - CleanSpark: $104 million - Solaris Energy: $62 million - T1 Energy: $43 million - Bitfarms: $38 million - Bitdeer: $29 million - Power Solutions: $26 million - WhiteFiber: $20 million - Babcock and Wilcox: $19 million - SharonAI: $18 million - ProPetro: $13 million - Hive Digital: $6 million He is also running call options on specific names at the same time as his puts, which means he is not simply betting against semiconductors everywhere. - Micron CALL: $422 million - SanDisk CALL: $388 million - Taiwan Semiconductor CALL: $354 million - CoreWeave CALL: $140 million - Bloom Energy CALL: $55 million This means he believes the companies supplying power, storage, and compute to the AI industry still have years of growth ahead of them. But the chip companies that Wall Street has been buying for the past two years at record valuations have already priced in everything good that is going to happen to them. The man who has been right about every major AI trade for the past 18 months is now betting that the biggest names in semiconductors are about to fall. If his track record means anything, the chip stocks Wall Street has been buying for the past two years may be in serious trouble.
Community note
The values for put options in 13F filings (e.g., $2.04B SMH PUT) represent the notional value of the underlying securities controlled by the options, not the premium paid or amount invested. netacn.com/faq
49
61
979
223,910
May 18
X going crazy over @leopoldasch Situational Awareness 13F release: Amusing interpretation of notional to $13.6bn from $5.2bn; notional value has increased due to notional (not premium) value of $8.5bn. Big influencers talking doom on these Puts. This is part of the picture only: The last 30mins I have been educating Claude4.7 about 13F and Options. Claude has apologized to me twice and flipped its initial conclusions. The critical point about 13Fs, is for some sick reason, they only include longs. For options this is significant, as not only do we not know timing, expiration date, even strikes, but we have no idea about short puts (ie is structure part of a put spread - limited hedge), is it funded by short calls? Is a long Call part of a short call spread or a long call spread? Is it part of some more complex structure, is it offset by an exotic or OTC or private transaction? There are some conclusions to be made from Leopold's latest filing, but they don't need to be quite as dramatic as the first responders are making out. Those that know will be the executing option traders at banks. Look for analyst reports from said banks; ofc supposed to be chinese walls, but senior meetings often overlap and one side doesn't want to look stupid. Or ofc, we are blessed with Leopold doing interviews; watch out for tells and how he answers re Puts or Option strategies. Interesting quote from Claude - 'I apologize, that's twice you have caught me with sophisticated points that I should have considered more deeply. The reporting is unhelpful here. Headlines like "SA has $8.4B in puts" treat all puts as monolithic bearish bets. That's not how derivatives work and not how a $5B fund manages them.' Human experience still counts for something.
1
3
29
2,729
TS retweeted
1) A large purchase of BTC May29 75k Puts in isolation is a signal, but should not induce unease. But add a simultaneous outisized purchase of ETH May29 2100 Puts and alarm bells might ring. Net $500m notional, $6.5m premium, executed within a brief period as Spot neared lows.🧵
5
7
64
30,321