Joined September 2011
4,177 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
15 Nov 2015
What causes #poverty? Nothing. It's the original state, the default and starting point. The real question is, What causes #prosperity?
457
6,035
12,695
Per Bylund retweeted
Un gran ejemplo del mayor daño de la regulación y la redistribución: todo lo que pudo haber sido creado por algún emprendedor si el Estado no se hubiera interpuesto en nombre de la “justicia social” o de corregir una supuesta "falla del mercado". Para comprender mejor el argumento, vale la pena leer este libro de @PerBylund 👇
If the socialists had their way, Elon would have had his paypal profits taken and redistributed for the greater good. The world would never have seen Tesla, nor SpaceX. And the world wouldn't know it, because they were uncreated, and thus unseen. Imagine the companies that don't exist, because Washington destroyed them before they were born.
1
2
11
1,019
Per Bylund retweeted
Replying to @PerBylund
I've been giving this book out to youngsters lately
2
12
572
People should read more. Or just interact with people. Spreading arbitrary homemade nonsense such as this actually causes harm. It's an all but criminal act.
Replying to @PerBylund
The only possible market without the State is barter, where fortuitous surpluses of different products are exchanged for each other by different tribes. The State is essential for the existence of the market because the market needs a neutral arbiter to keep its rules.
5
4
28
1,460
Just about a half hour away, don't forget to sign up to enjoy this webinar on why we should care about longevity. I'll moderate a fantastic discussion with insightful speakers.
This Saturday, we're exploring one of the most important questions for the liberty movement: Why Should Libertarians Care About Longevity? Don't miss this panel discussion with @MaryRuwart, Daniel Fylstra, and Jeff Crawford, moderated by @PerBylund 👉 Register now — it's free: us06web.zoom.us/webinar/regi…
1
2
9
1,090
Most high-horse positions are pretenses. Especially when claimed by these types of handles. But at least the mute should mean I will get less nonsense in my feed...
Replying to @PerBylund
Grow up Per. Muted.
2
18
1,350
Do take a look at the thread, though. It's revealing.
1
5
502
Happy to see my h-index (x articles cited by x works) increased to 24 and my i10-index (no less than 10 citations) is now at 40. Not shabby! scholar.google.com/citations…
2
1
37
907
Per Bylund retweeted
10 Feb 2024
"I was just doing my job," akin to "I was just following orders," is at the same time an admission of guilt (you did the act) and poor character (a moral failing due to fear, cowardice, or laziness). It is not a defense.
12
81
327
12,372
Whoever really cares about "economic power" should advocate for free markets, which reward only those who serve others and are voluntary, not state regulations, which produce a semi-static class system backed up by force. Or you're a fraud.
Concern about wealth inequality is not about jealousy over some guy having a bigger house. It is more about the fact that it may be a problem that one person has more economic power than entire countries.
8
13
81
2,239
Per Bylund retweeted
Socialists really believe this. They have no conception of people exchanging without first being told to do so by the State. That's how distant from reality (and humanity) they are.
28
35
328
5,296
Per Bylund retweeted
Replying to @PerBylund
The political left has long had a remarkable lack of interest in how wealth is created. As far as they are concerned, wealth exists somehow and the only interesting question is how to redistribute it." - Thomas Sowell
3
12
596
Per Bylund retweeted
"the services which money renders can be neither improved nor impaired by changing the supply of money. ... The quantity of money available in the whole economy is always sufficient to secure for everybody all that money does and can do." - Ludwig von Mises, Human Action, p. 418
2
4
20
1,109
Per Bylund retweeted
A lot of people seem to believe that while jobs provide income for people to buy goods, the jobs don't produce those goods, which means what the job is doesn't matter. It's as peculiar a view as it is common. A "job" is (remunerated) labor in production. It should be economized.
2
7
34
1,737
Why Should Libertarians Care About Longevity? Freedom, Self-Ownership and the Ethics of Living Longer Join us to explore one of the most exciting intersections of liberty and science: the ethics and philosophy of extending human life. 🎙️ Speakers: Daniel Fylstra Jeff Crawford Mary Ruwart 🎤 Moderator: Per Bylund 📅 Saturday, June 13th — 11:00 AM Central Time (USA) 💻 Free via Zoom — open to everyone 🔗 us06web.zoom.us/webinar/regi… Save your spot and pass it along — this is a conversation worth having.
Join us tomorrow for a one-hour free live panel on #longevity and freedom. Sign up at the link: us06web.zoom.us/webinar/regi…
4
1
27
1,781
Per Bylund retweeted
Replying to @PerBylund
"How value is created and the standard of living can be increased." Been revisiting The Problem of Production since yesterday. Underrated for its capital theory insights given its characterization of the enterprise's unique production structure in the broader market process.
1
2
6
688
Join us tomorrow for a one-hour free live panel on #longevity and freedom. Sign up at the link: us06web.zoom.us/webinar/regi…
1
1
5
2,363
"Communism eradicated more poverty than anything else in human history" This is true if one defines poverty as monetary inequality (excluding the political elites) rather than destitution. Because communism has proven very effective in making all non-insiders destitute (or dead).
18
6
91
2,815
But we do not actually need the historical record to prove this, although it too is very clear. Just minimal understanding for how value is created and the standard of living can be increased is enough to realize communism cannot have other outcomes.
1
19
701