Maturing is realising it wasn't just the Roman senators who stabbed Caesar. It was you too. We are all Brutus.

Prime example of the central problem with Christian apologetics. Needing to invent strawman positions for atheists only reveals at least two a probably three things. One, you lack the confidence in your own claims to defend them. Two, you're a dishonest turdnugget. Three, you don't believe in your god any more than I do since in your apologetics openly and happily engage in the very things your god says he hates. A compulsive liar can't very well expect me to believe in a god they don't believe in themselves.

Misogyny is when you don't think insults and criminal convictions require the same standard of evidence apparently.

Women. That's the answer you're looking for. Women. It is women who want young people to remain single. It is women who want young women, in particular, to believe that a husband-free, child-free existence driven by nothing more than proximate hedonia is living-your-best-life. To disambiguate: women do not want themselves to become sex-addled, girl-bosses who reset their body-count with each abortion. They want other women to become sex-addled, girl-bosses who reset their body-count with each abortion. It's called manipulative female reproductive suppression. It's one way women compete for reproductive success and in crumbling civilisations, it's the primary way. Women invest much of their time and energy in creating a social environment that is maximally hostile to reproductive success. Many of their rivals fail to reproduce. Evolutionarily, this is a death sentence: an extinction level event for each non-reproducing woman's genetic lineage. The women who are unhappy are the women losing the battle for their lineage's survival. They know something is not right, but they don't know how to fix it. And feminism - the primary ideological vehicle of female reproductive suppression - is working overtime to ensure that they never figure it out.

Patriarchy is the reason men can't have babies apparently. And here I was blaming the Romans.

Of all the ridiculous attempts Christians have pulled to try and shift the burden of proof for the claims of their mythology, this has got to be one of the most risible.

Can we start to talk about the effects of porn on women?

I’m afraid atheism isn’t “true by default”. It’s the rejection of a specific claim until that claim is supported. That isn’t bravery. It’s how burden of proof works. If you claim there is a God, a soul, angels, demons, divine judgement, miracles, revelation, heaven, hell, and a cosmic monarchy supervising human affairs, you have taken on the evidential burden. I don’t acquire an equal burden merely by declining to applaud. And no, atheism isn’t automatically a worldview. My disbelief in gods tells you roughly as much about my politics, ethics, aesthetics, metaphysics, or preferred sandwich as my disbelief in leprechauns. This meme is basically remedial epistemology with cartoon fish. Which is, I suppose, on brand.

So just to be clear, You're 100% sure the guy that replied to your tweet is an incel but you had no idea that one guy who pumped and dumped you was a loser?

I may not know in advance exactly what evidence would convince me. That is hardly surprising. I also don’t know in advance what evidence would convince me of an undiscovered particle, an unknown illness, or a crime whose facts I haven’t yet seen. But an omniscient God would know. The Christian God is not supposed to be some baffled street preacher throwing apologetics at the wall and hoping one of the pamphlets sticks. He supposedly knows my mind more perfectly than I do. He knows what I misunderstand, what evidence I lack, what cognitive barriers I have, and what would rationally bring me to belief without coercing me. And according to Christianity, he doesn’t merely know this. He loves me. So he is motivated to provide what is needed. He is also omnipotent. So he is capable of providing it. He is perfectly good. So he would not reasonably condemn or blame me for failing to respond to evidence he knows I have not been given in a form I can recognise as sufficient. So the question is not, “Why don’t you, a finite human being, specify in advance the exact evidence that would convince you?” The question is why an all-knowing, all-loving, all-powerful God has apparently arranged matters so that sincere disbelief remains possible at all. If God knows what would convince me, wants me convinced, and can convince me, then my continued non-belief is not a mystery about my stubbornness. It is a problem for your theology.

Every time I see women flap their gums about the "manosphere" it amazes me that women are not better fiction writers. With all that practice you would think they would be better at it.

It's funny that in their attempt to shit on men, women paint us as near all powerful beings who just unilaterally created an entire moral system out of thin air while painting themselves as stupid children who lack any agency. As I see it evolutionary psychology is more than enough to explain the disparity in male and female mate preferences and why both sexes play into it. But I'll be your Nietzschean superman if that's what you want 😂

This right here is typical female accountability. Zero men involved but they still find a way to blame their lousy behaviour on men.

Pre-2008 Children of God ✝️ 2008 - 2009 vaguely Christian ✝️ 2010 onwards, Atheist ⚛️

"Women are naturally expensive” sounds like something luxury brands made up and some people accidentally adopted as a personality trait

If there is a take where the word "foid" was made for, it's takes like this where women shame men for their hobbies. Seems like foids come in all kinds of political orientations... She then backtracks, saying that it is a popular observation, and then calls men "feminists" when their hobbies are mocked... The reason this is going nuclear is that it fits into the usual narrative where women hate it when men have fun in things that aren't useful to them. It doesn't matter if they are tradwives or not, and many are the same. The reason gaming is popular for men is that it isn't just fun... It's because the developed Western world has become openly hostile to men. It is the only hobby that isn't excessively expensive or revolves around impressing women. It is the modern equivalent of the gentlemen's club, which were all shut down due to "mah sexism", where it's just men socializing in a manner that's seen as "toxic" to these foids. But instead of seeing things from a man's mental frame, these foids only see if the hobby makes them useful to them or not. People like her literally cannot fathom why men and gamer women are telling her to STFU, and then call us emotional... classic projection. Women who get it aren't shaming men. They either game with them or shut up about it and do something else Meanwhile, foids are captured in endless ego solipsism... every. single. time... Doesn't matter if the woman is a conservative, non-trad, liberal, or trad... that trap is something so many women fall into easily.

Feminism NEEDS an enemy. A locus for the "in group" to focus its collective hate on. First it was Men. Misandry was doctrine. Then it was the Anti-Woke. Then the Anti-Trans. Now it is the Manosphere. Red Pill/Manosphere needs no enemy. It is purely The Pursuit of Truth.

Atheist: "we believe in logic and reason" Also atheist: *too stupid to realise when they're talking to another atheist* This right here is why you don't go and make such silly claims.

Also cooking the chicken to 90 degrees (or whatever the Yankee equivalent is)or above will kill the salmonella.

Few posts demonstrate women's learned uselessness quite so succinctly. "There should be" as if cities just emerge fully formed from the aether to be distributed to useless women.