@Proemed45 profile picture
Steve Wilson @Proemed45

Taking a part the lies... one at a time

Joined March 2018
  • Tweets 2,272
  • Following 34
  • Followers 58
16 Photos and videos
Pain Mgmt is the new thing that EST was to the 1980s ppl looking 👀 for a new fad to follow. Politics is now deciding what is right for ppl’s lives, especially the ones the politicians never meet or hear from
5
Rwrrr
85
And finally Mars proves Jimmy is wrong again Mars: Mars has a thin atmosphere with a small amount of carbon dioxide. While it does experience a greenhouse effect, it's much weaker compared to Earth, leading to colder average temperatures.
1
1
83
To continue with the answer showing Jimmy is FOS Venus: Venus has a thick atmosphere rich in carbon dioxide, which creates an extreme greenhouse effect. This results in surface temperatures hot enough to melt lead.
1
67
Yes, the greenhouse gas (GHG) effect can occur on other planets, though the specifics can vary based on each planet's atmosphere, composition, and distance from the sun. AI response
53
Steve Wilson retweeted
Jim Bannister@bannister_jimbo
30 Oct 2025
Replying to @DanCady @patfrank830 @Narkophobia @BrknMan @Willard1951 @CyfraithEcocide @AutumnMandrake @scruztiger @COrepKdeGraaf @jemmm85517813 @DarsenDavid @MichalYouDoing @TWTThisIsNow @Ceist8 @rwerkh @DaleGribble_666 @psud12 @priscian @waynejv1973 @MarcEHJones @Konrad_Chapman @NdabaningiMoyo @De_Rechtlijnige @Visitor51171015 @ejwwest @JamesWest12 @1000Frolly @AtomsksSanakan @Proemed45 @PoyetPatrice @kevhof52 @ShroedingerBird @TMGFlorida @MusicFrom90 @idummkopp @Rebecca74083947 @greenartdf @BennoList @LxxResearcher @VoteBlueUrban @RCownie @ICcrapdaily @DarrenDrpage @SGMTrailbuilder @JrmeBrwnCt @TheDisproof
Prof. Robert Holmes. T(Venus)=fourth root of 1.91 x T(earth). 1.91 is the relative insolation for Venus. Earth is 1. Comparison temperatures are: Earth temp. At 1 atm is 288K. Venus temp. At 1 atm is 289K. GHG’s have no influence on the temperature of planets.
5
1
2
144
To all who followed the thread if someone shows a simple lab Demo know enough to believe it or seriously explain what goes wrong and WHY. Instead these clowns tried to make up stuff thats NOT HAPPENING just so they dont want to believe their own eyes ! Smart !
39
This is Ken deGraff on the rxn of Alka Seltzer H2O NaHCO3​(s) H2​O(l)→NaOH(aq) CO2​(g) H2​O(l) " If I wanted specifics, I’d do the stoichiometry, but I’m not, so I won’t. CO2 is a resultant of the acid-base reaction. There’s no co2 in the tablets" The g means gas Ken
43
Steve Wilson retweeted
Rep Ken deGraaf, CO HD-22
@COrepKdeGraaf
30 Oct 2025
Replying to @Proemed45 @bannister_jimbo @CyfraithEcocide @BStarr96522 @BrknMan @DaleGribble_666 @priscian @DanCady @NdabaningiMoyo @rwerkh @waynejv1973 @DarsenDavid @AutumnMandrake @jemmm85517813 @Narkophobia @Permagardenet @scruztiger @TWTThisIsNow @patfrank830 @Willard1951 @MichalYouDoing @Ceist8 @psud12 @MarcEHJones @Konrad_Chapman @De_Rechtlijnige @Visitor51171015 @ejwwest @JamesWest12 @1000Frolly @AtomsksSanakan @PoyetPatrice @kevhof52 @ShroedingerBird @TMGFlorida @MusicFrom90 @idummkopp @Rebecca74083947 @greenartdf @BennoList @LxxResearcher @VoteBlueUrban @RCownie @ICcrapdaily @DarrenDrpage @SGMTrailbuilder @JrmeBrwnCt @TheDisproof
If I wanted specifics, I’d do the stoichiometry, but I’m not, so I won’t. CO2 is a resultant of the acid-base reaction. There’s no co2 in the tablets.
1
1
1
70
So Rep Ken can keep up here is an AI ans When you drop Alka-Seltzer into water (Hâ‚‚O), it reacts with the sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) present in the tablet. This reaction produces carbon dioxide gas (COâ‚‚), which is responsible for the fizzing and bubbling you observe.
33
Steve Wilson retweeted
Rep Ken deGraaf, CO HD-22
@COrepKdeGraaf
30 Oct 2025
Replying to @Proemed45 @bannister_jimbo @CyfraithEcocide @BStarr96522 @BrknMan @DaleGribble_666 @priscian @DanCady @NdabaningiMoyo @rwerkh @waynejv1973 @DarsenDavid @AutumnMandrake @jemmm85517813 @Narkophobia @Permagardenet @scruztiger @TWTThisIsNow @patfrank830 @Willard1951 @MichalYouDoing @Ceist8 @psud12 @MarcEHJones @Konrad_Chapman @De_Rechtlijnige @Visitor51171015 @ejwwest @JamesWest12 @1000Frolly @AtomsksSanakan @PoyetPatrice @kevhof52 @ShroedingerBird @TMGFlorida @MusicFrom90 @idummkopp @Rebecca74083947 @greenartdf @BennoList @LxxResearcher @VoteBlueUrban @RCownie @ICcrapdaily @DarrenDrpage @SGMTrailbuilder @JrmeBrwnCt @TheDisproof
What?? You think the bubbles are stored in the tablet?? It’s an acid-base reaction between citric acid and sodium bicarbonate.
1
1
3
64
Ya because thats what REAL scientist do if they cant explain what you can see in a video ya just tell the class well dont LOOK ! LOL, I'd ask for a refund on your so called PhD there buddy because your FAILING HARD! LOL
1
24
Also Jim the atm pressure is taken as 1 ATM. Its not gonna drastically change. You dont walk outside and say oh gee today it feels like we are at 4 ATM. So the pressure is not some special condition. Changes from the EARTH's SURFACE is what can cause a whole thermal runaway prob
1
26
Question 2 Pat is do you have ANY data that shows man made GHG is not made in excess of what can be reabsorbed ? Otherwise the only logical answer is you have met the criteria for AGW ! And you havent attacked either one of these questions Pat !
1
26
The prob of GW has 2 main pts one does rising levels of GHG give any doubt of rising temps ? No we KNOW how and we know why. 2nd question where is the excess GHG coming from ? That what we need data for. So Pat if you cant disprove 1 then GW is happening .
1
13
Pat you are lost in your own head ! No uncertainty is NOT what you use when proving concepts ! You start with KNOWN LAWS of Physics and Chem. You KNOW that those support inc GHG means inc in air temp no question of model sensitivity can dispute that !
1
14
That is just that Pat, we know the conc are increasing. Without question we KNOW we are the reason the GHG levels are rising. That can only lead to a thermal run away situation Pat. I know radiative heat. Besides there is no cooling as this is a planet not a car engine
11
Everytime I bring up basic science which starts with basic gas LAW such as Arrhenius you dont answer. Because its universal and applicable to all kinds of gas chemistry which anyone who took ODE can solve with data pts ! Of course you dont go there because its FUNDAMENTAL
16
John MacArthur was a lying politician masquerading as a so called pastor.
18
Patrice Poyet is a fake and a poser pretending to be an authority on climate while actually not knowing even the basics.
1
33
Load more