I have a theory that @ChadSteingraber and @heythereRich are actually one and the same. Says the guy using one of the most famous alter egos in movie history.

So, fellow #FAssets participants: I have some data to share about my experience with minting/redeeming FXRP via FAssets so far. This afternoon I created a spreadsheet listing every minting/redeeming transaction I've made since the system opened. (There's no way to download it, so I had to do manual data entry.) Screencap of the top of the Excel sheet is attached. To date I have minted 96 FXRP lots and redeemed 96 FXRP lots. Each redemption has cost me 0.5 XRP, for total redemption costs of 48 XRP. *Most* mints have cost me 1.0 XRP, but a few times (especially in the last 24 hours) I've absent-mindedly accepted mints with 5.0 XRP fees (I've done this three times) and 3.0 XRP fees (I've done this once). Caveat emptor on these. I also have a couple mints where the fee was 1.25 XRP. My total minting costs have been 112 XRP. That means my total investment so far in the #FAssets testing has been 160 of my own XRP. At the XRP market price (~$2.22 as I write this), we're looking at ~$355 "invested" in the test. I think that's more than enough participation for now, honestly, especially with the unclear rFLR rewards picture. I'm gonna sit on my hands now and see what the rFLR rewards look like come 12/30. If, twelve months from now, the fully-vested value of that rFLR is not sufficient to re-purchase at least 160 XRP, I will be...displeased. But...I have still faith in what @HugoPhilion is building, both the canary network and the main Flare network, and thus I'm comfortable being in wait-and-see mode.

Actually, I forgot about the $SGB costs for each lot minted. At 96 lots (see initial tweet above), figure that's another $100 invested. So, I have ~$455 (given current asset values) invested in the first two-week testing window - and awaiting rFLR rewards on 12/30.