A 5% tax on Elon’s net worth would fund every community health center in America for the next 26 years. I’ll say it again. Tax the rich.

They spent years screaming that mail-in voting was the single most secure, flawless, ironclad system mankind had ever devised. Questioning it made you a dangerous conspiracy theorist who probably enjoyed fish pizza. Then the Postal Service said, “Okay, let’s add a barcode and check the ballots against actual eligible voter lists.” Suddenly it was the end of democracy, unconstitutional, racist, fascist, and guaranteed to disenfranchise tens of millions. The same people who insisted the system needed zero verification lost their minds the second anyone suggested basic chain of custody. That reaction only makes sense when you look at what they’re actually protecting. Los Angeles has a billion-dollar homeless services bureaucracy that can’t house anyone, can’t account for the money, and gets its funding pulled even by liberal county officials because it’s become a useless, bloated mess. But that same operation maintains detailed instructions for registering “unhoused clients” ... their words for drug-addled or outright crazy people ... and routing their mail-in ballots through shelters and agency offices. Cross streets count as a residence. “Frank’s backyard” is apparently a valid address. The federal government even hosts guides in multiple languages teaching NGOs how to help people who just got here sign up before their citizenship paperwork is sorted. “I help you, you help me.” They can’t find the receipts. They can’t find the homeless. But they never lose a voter registration form. A simple barcode would ruin the whole arrangement. Ballots wouldn’t magically appear from vague intersections anymore. They’d show up in batches from single service centers on the same day. Fiction addresses would get returned to sender. And the people who spent five years calling the system perfect would have to explain why basic tracking feels like an existential threat. (article below)

TEXAS SENATE RACE: The framers intended the Senate to represent the states, but the 17th Amendment gutted that intent. The majority of money flowing into James Talarico’s senate race is from NY and CA so effectively if he wins they will have picked our senator. Repeal the 17th.

Musk is worth more than South Africa’s GDP. @BernieSanders and I proposed a 5% tax on people like him. In one year, it could fund: - free public college & trade school -$10/day childcare - Special-needs education nationwide Wealth inequality is the moral failure of our time.

Americans are struggling to pay for groceries and gas while Elon Musk becomes a TRILLIONAIRE. When the federal government is for sale, the rich get richer and everyone else gets shafted. The system is rigged.

We are dealing with legit demons.

You know how I know the CA Election was “rigged?” After OVER A WEEK of “counting” ballots in California, the people of LA County VOTED to raise their own sales tax. Yeah… OK 👌

Career DOJ officials were horrified at what Garland was doing targeting parents This is full weaponization caught in 4K

The reason CA is so fucked is the stupid-smart people like this who pretend to not understand that homeless people aren’t voting. They’re having their ballots commandeered by scammers. He knows that 60K homeless drug addicts didn’t suddenly commit to civic engagement.

How do you run a country where a random Libyan whose mother was in the US for 24 hours to give birth is now qualified to be the President of the United States?

This weeks apocalyptic industrial warehouse fire brought to you by the former one million square foot Medline medical supply distribution center currently ablaze in Tracy, California

Not to be confused with the crude oil spill in South Los Angeles, or the volatile chemical storage facility in Garden Grove, but there is now a massive industrial fire in South Gate. This post brought to you by Gavin Newsom, reminding you that California leads the nation in green environmental blah blah blah

Imagine you’re sitting at a poker table with friends. You throw down a three of a kind. The same guy gets up, goes to the bathroom, and comes back three minutes later with a better three of a kind. This keeps happening. At what point do you stop telling yourself it’s probably just a coincidence? That’s the exact situation happening in California. California keeps delivering election results that shift after long, unexplained delays, after huge mail-in batches, and after verification standards most serious countries would reject outright. And every time people raise an eyebrow, they’re told some version of “trust the process.” Meanwhile, in parts of the world they still count votes out in the open with painted rocks in the town square so everyone watching can see the count happen in real time. No mystery. No back rooms. No “we’ll update the numbers in a few days.” The entire goal is making sure normal people actually believe the outcome is legitimate. Real legitimacy comes from processes that look believable to the people who have to accept the results. When you do the opposite ... hidden counting, weak verification, multi-day delays ... you’re not strengthening trust. You’re just seeing how much the public will tolerate before they stop believing anything. So here’s the real question: How many times does the guy have to come back from the bathroom with a suspiciously better hand before we’re allowed to say the game looks rigged? Not stolen in some dramatic movie sense. Just structurally built so the house advantage is obvious to anyone paying attention. When does “trust the process” stop being reassurance and start sounding like an insult? (article below)