The biggest part that this story misses is that this house had already been bid on accepted and exchanged before any gift, which means the financial part had already been in place, but if course don't let a good story get in the way of the truth. The establishment stitch up starts.

Activist: "Your cows are putting carbon into the atmosphere." Farmer: "Where did they get it?" Activist: "What?" Farmer: "The carbon. Where did the cow get it before it put it anywhere." Activist: "From... eating?" Farmer: "From eating grass. And where did the grass get it." Activist: "The soil?" Farmer: "The air. The grass pulled it out of the air last spring. The cow ate the grass. The cow breathed some of it back out. It went back into the air it came from." Activist: "But it's still going into the atmosphere." Farmer: "It's going back. There's a difference between a thing going somewhere and a thing going back. You've described a circle and you're frightened of it." Activist: "Then just don't have the cow." Farmer: "The grass still dies in autumn. It rots where it falls. The carbon goes back into the air either way, just without anyone getting fed in the middle." Activist: "It's not that simple." Farmer: "It's grass, cow, breath, grass. Or it's grass, rot, air, grass. Same circle, fewer dinners. If that's complicated for you I'd stay away from the water cycle. That one's got clouds in it."

‘The last thing the British people need now’ …. What shameful arrogance to assume after this result that you can tell the British public what they need.

Never a truer word spoken!

Lammy you utter baffoon. 'Delivering change faster' No!! We don't want your 'change' at all. We certainly don't want it to be 'faster'. The ONLY change that you can deliver for the British People is a change of Government. The electorate have spoken. Neigh... They've shouted it from the roof tops!! Labour is not welcome here.

The English and others don't want you anymore, but you don't care and spend your time posting useless tweets. What don't you understand?

More meaningless words **written by his publicity agents**. Slippery Starmer doesn't even write this crap Starmer is the worst PM Great Britain has ever had in Great British History! #starmermustresign #StarmerResign #LabourSleaze #LabourLies #LabourChaos #SupportReformUK

Why is getting what you vote for a "punishment"?

@TedUrchin Ted, calling basic democratic accountability "vile" is exactly why normal people are fleeing your socialist bubble. Farage is simply stating the obvious: if you vote for open-border parties that demand endless migration, then you should host the consequences — detention centres, hotels, strained services and all. Reform voters are saying "enough," so their areas get spared. That's not "vile," that's called **consequences** for your virtue-signalling politics. You can't cheer for mass immigration, call anyone who objects a "racist," then scream when the reality lands on your street. That's not compassion — that's hypocrisy with a side of NIMBY. "Not in my backyard, but definitely in theirs." The public is sick of being lectured by people like you while watching their communities change beyond recognition and their taxes fund the chaos. Reform isn't prioritising "money and the right wing" — it's prioritising British voters who’ve been ignored for decades. Keep clutching your pearls, Ted. The rest of the country is waking up. May 7 can’t come soon enough.

What an idiotic position. Spend billions on a non existing threat thereby creating one. Are EU politicians too stupid to use diplomacy - talk to the other side! We know Biden, being mentally challenged, did not do this and we see the results.

We voted to leave in 2016. Not “leave a bit.” Not “leave until someone in Westminster gets bored.” Leave. What followed? Years of political tap dancing—Prime Ministers treating the result like a spelling mistake they could quietly correct if they squinted hard enough. And now—after all that—the big idea is: “Let’s just rejoin.” Of course. Because nothing says stable, serious governance like reversing the biggest democratic decision in modern British history on a whim. No plan. No terms. No clue what we’d have to give up to get back in. Just vibes… and a superiority complex. And here’s the part they hope you don’t notice: It wasn’t even in the Labour manifesto. Funny that. Because when politicians actually believe in something, they tend to mention it before asking for your vote. But this? This feels more like: “Don’t worry about what we said—this is what we meant.” You’re not being governed… you’re being managed. So now the question isn’t just about the EU— It’s this: When did democratic decisions become optional? Because if the answer is “whenever it’s inconvenient”… Then yeah— we’re not voters anymore. We’re mugs.

Ed,Ed,Ed. Trying to set the narrative! But nothing you say is true. Prior to the election. Your manager said £400 off energy bills. You got elected and YOU try to reframe it to £300.YOU realise that’s not attainable and reframe it AGAIN to £150 off bills. REPEATEDLY saying this to the media.TODAY you announce £117 off energy bills! £73 HIGHER than when you came in office! This is after your REGIME said in its MANIFESTO , taxes will not go up !! YOU campaigned on it. The tax burden is at one of the highest levels since the 1960’s . YOUR NET ZERO STRATEGY IN ISOLATION IS MADNESS. The UK has now one of the HIGHEST ENERGY PRICES IN THE WORLD which is not competitive for business and is increasing the COST OF LIVING. You have not achieved any target but are a significant cost to the UK PLC ( the taxpayer) . In reality you should resign. In the private sector, you would have been fired.Shocking - Labour is a “ HOUSE OF CARDS”.

This is a rich person's idea of what a poor person's home looks like.

We often hear the claim that intermittent solar and wind are cost-competitive with reliable sources of electricity. This is an accounting fraud. The cost of solar and wind is paid on top of the cost of an on-demand power source, not instead of it, because solar and wind can't be relied on to produce 24/7/365 electricity.

If I bought a donkey , because someone told me they eat Less oats. But the donkey eats more oats and I have to keep the horse, because sometimes the donkey won't let me ride him , you might question my judgement .

If the financial cost of Net Zero doesn't alarm you, the physical reality should. A wind turbine commissioned in 2025 is essentially e-waste by 2045. We're currently using high-density fossil fuels to build low-density wind solar replacements that cannot reproduce themselves. Now meet turbine decay: 300,000 turbines - most with non-recyclable blades - will hit landfills by 2040. Solar decay: Billions of panels with a 20-24-year lifespan all need to be replaced - possibly twice over by 2050. Grid crisis: National electricity grids were never designed for intermittent power. It's not just being updated, it's being forced into an unsustainable configuration. We're replacing a self-sustaining energy system with a high-maintenance 'disposable' one. Welcome to a dark future of perpetual rebuilding.

Another MP ditches their **constituency** to play Foreign Secretary... now it's Yvette Cooper jetting off on global trips while local issues in Rhondda and Ogmore get ignored! 😡 First endless overseas missions, now promoting foreign affairs nonstop on social media instead of fixing Britain's problems at home. MPs are elected and **paid by taxpayers** to serve their voters – not act like globe-trotting diplomats! I'm launching a petition to **BAN all MPs** (especially ministers) from unnecessary overseas travel AND from using their platforms to push foreign policy hype unless it's a true national crisis. Time for them to prioritise **British constituents** over playing international statesman! Enough jet-setting & virtue-signalling abroad – get back to the job you're actually paid for in Britain! 🇬🇧 #MPsForThePeople #StopTheJetSetting #ConstituencyFirst #UKPolitics #HoldThemAccountable #BritainFirst RT to make this go viral! 🚀

🇬🇧 UK MET OFFICE CAUGHT USING TEMPERATURE DATA FROM STATIONS THAT DON'T EXIST TO SUPPORT CLIMATE POLICIES Britain's Met Office is facing awkward questions after an investigator discovered over 80% of its temperature monitoring sites are classified as "junk" with measurement uncertainties of 2°C to 5°C. That's not a typo – 5 degrees Celsius of potential error. Only 19 pristine Class 1 sites remain capable of measuring actual ambient air temperature accurately. The rest? Located on airport runways, walled gardens, next to main roads, and inside solar farms. Places where concrete, engines, and infrastructure create artificial heat islands that have nothing to do with atmospheric temperature changes. The Met Office database also contains data from over 100 stations that don't exist. They're using "estimated" temperatures from unidentified neighboring stations and presenting it as real data. When journalist Ray Sanders started asking questions through Freedom of Information requests, the Met Office dismissed them as "vexatious" and "not in the public interest." After media inquiries, the Met Office quietly removed estimated data from 3 non-existent stations. Of 17 new sites opened since April 2024, nearly 65% were immediately placed in the worst quality categories. UK Science Minister Lord Patrick Vallance is calling scrutiny of this mess "misinformation" that weakens trust in science. Perhaps what actually weakens trust in science is using temperature readings from imaginary thermometers next to jet engines to justify trillion-pound Net Zero policies that reshape the entire economy. The data might be fine for tomorrow's weather forecast. Using it to revolutionize Britain's energy infrastructure? That requires stations that actually exist. Source: ZeroHedge