~Right-libertarian, but I like to tweet about sci-fi, fantasy, wordplay, language, and tech. I don't hide my beliefs, but I'm open-minded.

Joined March 2017
7,951 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Ages come and pass, leaving memories that become legends. Legend fades to myth, and even myth is long forgotten… Thank you, friends.
5
1
68
10,483
I hope you find a man who cherishes you the way you deserve to be cherished, Rue. ♥️🫂
My ex never wore his wedding ring and in retrospect I think it is that he was never truly in the marriage. If I ever marry again I hope it is to someone who cherishes the symbolic meaning of the ring and never takes it off. It must be lovely to be that wife.
2
48
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
The @nyknicks last won a championship in 1973. Here are some words whose first known use appeared in 1973: -BFF -face time -improv -pay-per-view -Stockholm syndrome -trash talk -shootaround -dramedy -bounce house -control key -ditz -off-grid -uncanny valley
1
37
279
12,945
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
When I said this throughout my campaign, CNN people called me cruel and unhinged. Now, after they helped secure the election for the 2 dorks responsible for all these problems, CNN is now echoing my campaign talking points as gospel. Fascinating!

959
11,872
66,676
914,574
If I get a monument at all, I'll be thrilled if it just reads "Husband & Papa".
This reminds me of how when Indian women were supposed to vote for the first time, most of them did not know their own names, even today my grandmother's name is hardly ever mentioned, she's just Amma, she told me her name once when I was 6.
49
My kids went to a church-based daycare. The church saw it as a ministry to the community. They mostly employed ladies w young kids who attended free, giving them a chance to earn extra for their families while being close to their own kids all day. Leftists schemed to add degree reqts. 😡
question for logical thinkers: it seems to me there are two possible conclusions after reading this. 1) the speaker (charitably) is not inclined to apply logic before speaking, and two, she’s lying to achieve some end without regard to means. am i wrong?
1
2
38
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
The most envious, Marxist, redistributive person in the world isn't the guy busting his hump to frame a house, or the guy grinding out DoorDash...it's the smug guy worth 7 or 8 figures staring at a trillionaire he considers socially beneath him.
Jimmy Kimmel warned against "obscenely wealthy weirdo" Elon Musk becoming the world's first trillionaire. Watch: rollingstone.com/tv-movies/t…
116
609
4,544
155,120
Gm, friends! What's everyone up to?
6
4
103
The U.S. Tea Party did this too! We love all our new friends in Japan! 日本から来た新しい友達が大好きです!
Japanese fans staying behind in the stadium to clean their sector after the 2-2 draw against the Netherlands in Dallas. This is a Japanese tradition has gone viral at numerous previous World Cups. 🇺🇸🇯🇵
2
48
I notice that the FIFA World Cup finals won't occur until July 19. Does anyone know if @FreddyLA7 will be staying until the end? (Best of luck to the Deutschland and the USA teams!)
1
1
47
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
My quote from the New York Times today: Adeo Ressi, Mr. Musk’s college roommate at the University of Pennsylvania, said the SpaceX chief never cared as much about financial gain as obtaining resources to help him achieve his entrepreneurial goals. For Mr. Musk, “money is a means to an end,” Mr. Ressi said, comparing his friend’s mind-set to a gamer accumulating coins in a video game to beat a level. “He’s amassing resources to do things, and the thing he wants to do most is colonize Mars,” Mr. Ressi said. “That’s a really big driving force behind his wealth accumulation.” He added that Mr. Musk was “not a poster child of wealth inequality” and pointed to the tech leader’s lifestyle, in which he is known to work around the clock and avoid the typical trappings of the rich, like islands and megayachts. “It’s not like he’s planning to leave this in a massive family trust,” Mr. Ressi said. “It’s literally going to be used to make humanity into a multiplanetary species.” 🚀 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 Congratulations on the SpaceX IPO! nytimes.com/2026/06/12/techn…
39
124
812
86,325
Anyone have a lovable space that needs my face? If so, come and knock on our door.
3
3
93
Posts like this give me a sense of hope for humanity's future.
Asteroid mining is not only going to make a lot more trillionaires, it's going to make us all rich. Just like the Industrial Revolution, the Space Revolution will greatly increase standards of living across humanity... yours, mine, everyone's. Electric light and indoor plumbing were once luxuries. Now they are so universal that we can have them and still think of ourselves as poor. But preindustrial folk would have thought us wealthy beyond measure. What's coming is another paradigm shift. You may think this is all theoretical. You may think asteroid mining is an unproven concept. You're wrong. Because you don't know one critical fact. We're already asteroid mining. And we've been doing it since the Bronze Age. All gold we mine on earth, all the copper for wires, the uranium for reactors, all the iron for nails, everything made of heavy metals that you own, or use, or have ever seen... it's all mined from ancient asteroid strikes. All the native Earth metals sunk to the core when the whole planet was molten. Past our reach. Do you think there are precious metals, like gold and silver and platinum? Do you think that even common metals, like iron and tin and copper, cost a lot to extract and refine? Artificial scarcity. Every piece of metal you have ever seen was sourced from the tiny percentage of asteroids that once hit Earth. Leave the gravity well, learn to sail the void, and we can loot all the asteroids that haven't. Imagine that we built all of civilization picking up our raw materials, grain by grain, with tweezers. Asteroid mining, true asteroid mining, is a shovel. And no, not a hand tool shovel, I mean the shovel attachment on the front of an industrial digger. That's why SpaceX has trillion dollar plus valuation. And unless we screw things up on Earth, and sabotage them somehow, that valuation is way too low. Below here, you'll see a different part of the plan. A little company, running out of a little industrial space in the San Fernando Valley, is building humanity the ultimate shopping bag. They think Mars is a sideshow, you see. They want to bag up asteroids, just scoop the little ones right up with a great big robot butterfly net, and bring back to high Earth orbit. Strip them down there, and build. If you thought data centers in space are wild, wait until you see factories in space. Wait until everything from toasters to CPUs to machine tools are made in high orbit, or on the moon, and the only bits that ever make it to Earth on the finished products. In space, minerals are cheap. And power is free. And it doesn't cost much of anything to move goods down a gravity well. You have no idea what's coming. Neither does SpaceX or Transastra, for that matter. They've got a hold of the tail of the elephant, and they think the Space Revolution is a rope. I'm a science fiction author. My job is to see the whole elephant. It's a big fucking elephant.
2
122
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
A young man, barely more than a boy, completed the bagging of my provisions. Then he reached for them again, though I had already taken hold. He was sixteen. In an apron. Smiling. "I got it, sir." He gripped my bags. I gripped my bags. In Japan, a man carries his own burden — this is the spine of a man, it is not negotiable. I pulled. He pulled. Gently. With the unstoppable leverage of POLICY. "It's literally my job, sir." Do you see the cruelty of this country? He weaponized his duty against my honor. Release the bags: I am a man who lets boys carry his rice. Hold the bags: I am a man who denies a boy his sworn office. There is no winning move. America has built a politeness trap with no exit and staffed it with teenagers. I lost. Record it. I lost a battle of honor to a sixteen-year-old with a name tag, and he did not know we were fighting. He carried my bags to the car talking about the weather. His name tag said KYLE. A man who loses to Kyle must study Kyle. So I have. Kyle has carried my groceries four times now. Kyle says "no worries" to every one of my objections, which is somehow a complete defense to all of them. Kyle is sixteen and has never once lost the bag battle, to anyone, in two years of service. Undefeated. In my country he would have a banner and a war name. So I have restructured the campaign. Kyle carries the bags. I guard the cart. Afterward, I return the cart to the corral — a duty I assigned myself, which Kyle calls "honestly a huge help." A man does not ask the trap to open. He only becomes useful inside it. We are a unit now. I praise him loudly to his manager every visit. Kyle pretends to be embarrassed. Kyle is not embarrassed. Hear me, America: if you wish to know a nation's future, look at who it sends to carry things. Yours sent Kyle. You will be fine.
77
526
5,845
80,729
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
"two counts of armed robbery and two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm." The penalties for armed robbery should be much more severe than they are. But I hate that second charge, because under the U.S. Constitution it should never be unlawful to possess a firearm. Ever. The bearing of arms is not a privilege for the government to grant or revoke, it's a natural right coequal with the right to free speech.
BREAKING UPDATE: Boston police arrested a 14-year-old in connection with lemonade stand armed robbery He faces two counts of armed robbery and two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm.
24
16
263
8,148
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
Masks, Palestine, socialism... my god it even has a master's degree
Palestine, master's degree, socialism, failson It's like they churn these guys out in a factory
1
5
106
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
If the socialists had their way, Elon would have had his paypal profits taken and redistributed for the greater good. The world would never have seen Tesla, nor SpaceX. And the world wouldn't know it, because they were uncreated, and thus unseen. Imagine the companies that don't exist, because Washington destroyed them before they were born.
460
2,650
15,937
347,845
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
Jun 13
My favorite genre of billionaire hate is by useless wads who sit on social media and collect money for doing not one single useful thing in their entire life and just say impossibly stupid things for clicks.
Trillionaires shouldn't exist and neither should billioniares. Tax every penny in net worth over $999 million at 100%. We can have extreme wealth concentration or a democracy but we can't have both at the same time. Pick one.
6
19
146
2,702
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
Gavin Newsom tweete sa rage. Le FT le compare à un méchant de James Bond. Le Globe and Mail publie un guide pour le détester. Tout ça le même jour. Vous voulez comprendre pourquoi la fourmilière s'agite à ce point ? Suivez-moi, c'est fascinant. Ce matin, Elon Musk est devenu le premier trillionnaire de l'histoire. Pas en héritant. Pas en taxant. Pas en régulant. En construisant des fusées réutilisables, des voitures électriques et un réseau de satellites qui connecte la planète. Et regardez bien qui panique : ce ne sont jamais les ingénieurs, les artisans, les entrepreneurs, les soignants, les agriculteurs. Ce sont les politiciens, les éditorialistes, les bureaucrates, les activistes professionnels. Bref, tous ceux dont le métier consiste à commenter, taxer ou redistribuer la valeur créée par les autres. Leur terreur n'est pas morale. Elle est existentielle. Consciemment ou inconsciemment, ils savent une chose qu'ils ne peuvent avouer à personne, pas même à eux-mêmes : leur action publique ne crée strictement aucune valeur nette. Tout leur statut repose sur un mensonge confortable, celui du socialiste bureaucrate : "la richesse existe par magie, le problème c'est juste de la répartir, et il faut des gens comme nous pour le faire." Ce mensonge tenait tant que la création de richesse restait abstraite. Mais Elon est un contre-exemple vivant à l'échelle planétaire. Mille milliards de dollars créés à partir de rien, sous les yeux de tout le monde, en temps réel. Chaque lancement de Starship est une réfutation publique de leur vision du monde. C'est insupportable. D'où la rage. "Le système est truqué", dit Newsom. Non Gavin. Le système truqué, c'est celui où l'on devient puissant en distribuant l'argent des autres. Le système d'Elon, c'est celui où l'on devient riche en rendant le lancement spatial 100 fois moins cher. Et voilà ce qui les terrifie vraiment : dans le monde qu'Elon est en train de construire, le statut ne s'obtient plus par la posture, le diplôme ou la tribune. Il s'obtient en créant quelque chose. Ils vont devoir apprendre un métier. Développer des compétences. Produire. L'agitation que vous observez, ce n'est pas de l'indignation. C'est le bruit d'une classe sociale entière qui réalise que sa rente touche à sa fin. Mais je vais finir sur un truc rassurant, parce qu'au fond je les aime bien. Ne vous inquiétez pas. Dans le monde d'Elon, le gâteau grossit. C'est toute la différence avec votre monde à somme nulle : il y aura de la place pour tout le monde, y compris pour vous. Vous êtes l'enfant qui pleure parce qu'il a peur de ne pas avoir de Kinder Bueno. Respirez. Il y aura des Kinder Bueno pour tout le monde.
Americans are struggling to pay for groceries and gas while Elon Musk becomes a TRILLIONAIRE. When the federal government is for sale, the rich get richer and everyone else gets shafted. The system is rigged.
93
603
2,148
107,846
The same sort of thinking was prevalent when Hugo Chavez took over Venezuelan industries. They discovered that "fairly allocating" jobs to favored insiders resulted in plummeting ability to deliver. Could govt "seize" @elonmusk 's wealth? Yes, but it would just disappear.
Middle-class leftists don't really understand the difference between wealth and money. That's because what they have is a job as a retarded commie journalist, which pays them money, which they put in the bank before spending it on Funko Pops, cannabis, dildos, and tofu. They think wealth is "more money". And when they think about "more money", they think about all the Funko Pops they want but can't afford, and about how Elon Musk can afford more Funko Pops than he could ever use, that is if Funko Pops could be used for anything, which they can't, unless you count leftists' strange propensity for putting unexpected things in places they do not belong. They don't understand that Elon Musk doesn't have some sort of special titanium credit bank card connected to a bank account with 260,000,000,000 munnies in it, for the buying of Funko Pops. What he has is some businesses he started, and a bunch of dudes whose job it is to guess the value of things have arrived at the consensus that they are worth that much. That guess changes by the hour. Leftists can't really wrap their heads around this idea, not in the intuitive sense that would allow them to engage with it as a concept. They can't imagine what it would be like to be in that position. Why not? Because if they could, they wouldn't be leftists. In fact, many people can, and therefore are not leftists, so leftists are really just the group of people who are self-selected for not being able to figure this out. This is why they can, without blushing, describe "reusable space launch capability" as "unnecessary wealth". They don't understand that if you took every share of SpaceX away from Elon Musk, and all the other shareholders, it would still be valued at 200 billion dollars (or whatever it is on the day you are reading this), but it would not magically transform into 200 billion one-dollar bills that you could give to left-wing journalists to buy more Funko Pops with. It would still be a bunch of factories, and designs, and offices, and employment contracts, and rocket engines, and stuff. The reality is that the earn-spend-consume model of money that retarded leftist commie journos are familiar with has an upper limit. Once you've spent on much on yourself as you want, a ceiling which varies depending on your character, you need a new source of meaning and purpose in life. You need to develop different ambitions. Then your spending becomes not about what you want to have, but what you want to create. You build the things you want to see in the world. This is where money becomes wealth. Money is used to buy things. Wealth is used to build things. When you create something that a lot of people care about, it's valued at a huge amount of money, because money is a measure of fucks given. So maybe, when you have enough money to buy a mansion and a yacht, you decide that what you really want is "reusable space launch capability", because you're a nerd who reads science fiction, and so you think it's a kind of dumb idea for humanity to spend all its time on one tiny dust speck in an infinite universe. So you buy some computers and you hire some dudes who are good at designing things on computers, and then you buy some metal, and hire some dudes who are good at cutting metal and sticking it together, and pretty soon you're the proud owner of whole bunch of stuff.... computers and factories and tanks full of liquid oxygen and launch pads and most importantly, rocket boosters. And no Funko Pops. Not a single one. Now, it's worth more money than you started with, because the people who guess the value of things (it's called a "stock market") are starting to agree that this was maybe a pretty good idea. So, on paper, you're richer than you ever were. But that's your not bank account, or your Funko Pop collection. That's the fact that you now control humanity's effort to leave the gravity well. And you control it because you built it in the first place. Wealth inequality is a measure of technological progress. It doesn't exist in low-tech societies where everyone is chasing antelope with a throwing stick and a stone-tipped spear. Because no one invents anything and there's nothing to own. And it peaks in high-tech societies where enterprising people create entire economies ex nihilo by investing in a wild idea. Because things are being invented and people give a fuck about them, and so the innovators have a much higher net worth than the people who sit around eating processed snack foods and shopping for Funko Pops on the internet. Reducing wealth inequality is a disaster, and typically requires one. If you reduce wealth inequality in a free market, you are either outright destroying growth enterprises, or transferring control of them to non-producers. Which is what leftists really are. Useless journo flacks and cloistered academics who want to tear down the engines of tech innovation so they can buy more middle class consumer goods, until they tear down the engines that produce those, too. The most important task in all of economics is keeping people who don't get shit done out of the way of people who do. Leave humanity's orbital launch capability alone, Zaid. It is already in the hands of the people who are best qualified to operate it. We know that because they are ones who built it in the first place. Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben bei das doomkompfen. Ist easy schnappen der springenverk.
70