Some key Qs that must be asked regarding defence spending and strategy.
Thanks to Richard Reeve
@RethinkingSecu1 for these.
1. How can the UK radically and rapidly reduce its military dependence on the US?
[to put it politely, the SDR rather ducked this most obvious of issues]
2. What trade-offs in international posture and commitments may be required to refocus defence and deterrence on the UK and Europe?
[The NATO First (but not only) framing did address this but without much specifics on what should be cut elsewhere, some of which happened stealthily, as in the quiet withdrawal of naval presence from the Gulf.]
3. Is it justifiable to spend c.25% of the defence budget over the long term on the nuclear weapons programme [DNE]?
[This was ignored, as per the ToR of the SDR. Only in recent months has MoD given some public clarity on the vast cost of the DNE, e.g. to the PAC inquiry.]
4. How can new technologies with military application be harnessed but also controlled?
[The SDR was big on possibilities of new tech, but nothing on how to regulate it or the implications of acquiring it from the US, Israel, etc.]
5. How can broader societal resilience be built, maintained or defended?
[Thereāve been many allusions to this āwar-footingā in SDR and NSS, which wouldnāt be the state Iād be looking to achieve, but no plan ever emerged for the mooted national conversation that might engage and involve British people. Also no wider sense from a post-values HMG of what we defend and why.]
6. What is the politically and economically affordable cost of credibly deterring further aggression against Europe and/or the UK?
[Not the cost of defending; thatās a vastly more expensive wartime issue, and we are not at war.]
The UK government seems disinterested in a ānational conversationā on security that listens to the public's views on its own security. New research by Dr Tom Martin on UK public opinion reveals significant divisions among voters about threats & responses.
rethinkingsecurity.org.uk/20ā¦