@FMCSA issues the NPRM for 371.3 THEN Truckers be like…

In the aftermath of SBTC's Petition for Default "Satisfactory" Safety Rating Rulemaking for New Entrants that pass initial safety audit and a Right of Existing Carriers to Request a Rating if Currently Rated as "No Rating," @FMCSA moves towards new policy of safety ratings for all carriers! overdriveonline.com/business… Read SBTC's Petition for Safety Rating Rulemaking to FMCSA here: downloads.regulations.gov/FM…

Do you support SBTC's legal efforts to get the U.S. Court of Appeals to compel @SecDuffy to decertify the CDL authority of @nysdmv and @CA_DMV as a matter of law?

If a trucking media platform is primarily funded by advertising, sponsorships, events, and relationships with large industry players, can it truly function as a driver-first publication?

I’ve always said these Freight X people are sellouts. They are not to be trusted.

I have ZERO sponsorships. None. Nada. Never have. Separates the MEN from the children. @STAAExposed @boneheadtruckrs @WillCookOnX @regguy69

Wait till he finds out about freight broker fatigue 🫠

In order to hold parties accountable, One must have: PROOF - of wrongdoing KNOWLEDGE - of the ins/outs MORALS - that cannot be bought DETERMINATION W/O FEAR - to do what it takes There aren’t many that fit the mold @Channel19S

It’s shippers like THIS That use freight brokers I WONDER WHY

WHEN THE WHISTLEBLOWERS START ASKING QUESTIONS A Driver’s Perspective Saturday June 6 2026 I’ve been reading a few posts from James Lamb and the STAA Whistleblowers group. Some of the language is strong. Some of the allegations are serious. Some claims may ultimately prove true, some may not. That is for the courts, investigators, and regulators to determine. What caught my attention was not the accusations themselves. It was the questions. One question stood out in particular: “Have you heard from OOIDA? Anyone?” Whether a driver agrees with James Lamb or not, that question deserves discussion. OOIDA is widely recognized as the largest organization representing owner-operators in America. They have fought many important battles over the years involving speed limiters, broker transparency, excessive regulation, parking shortages, and numerous issues affecting small trucking businesses. At the same time, many drivers are asking whether some of the most controversial issues facing trucking today are receiving enough public attention. Questions surrounding non-domiciled CDL enforcement, freight fraud, broker transparency, carrier vetting systems, and regulatory oversight continue to dominate conversations across trucking social media. Drivers see these topics every day. They talk about them on podcasts, on Facebook, on X, and on YouTube. The question is not whether OOIDA has worked on behalf of drivers. The record clearly shows they have. The question is whether drivers feel represented on the issues that concern them most right now. That is not a criticism. It is an observation. Every organization eventually faces a moment where its members begin asking difficult questions. Those questions should not automatically be viewed as attacks. In many cases they are signs that members care enough to expect answers. As an owner-operator myself, I am less interested in personalities than I am in outcomes. I am less interested in social media battles than I am in solutions. James Lamb’s recent posts may ultimately prove to be right, wrong, or somewhere in between. Time will sort that out. But one thing is certain: the questions being raised are not going away. And perhaps it is time for more people throughout the industry—not just whistleblowers, not just content creators, not just associations—to start answering them. Will Cook Just “A Driver’s Perspective”

Damn straight.

Who is OOIDA? Be advised. We are done playing Mr. Nice guy. All Trucker Hell is about to break loose. One lawsuit already filed over UCR illegality and Privacy Act violations. Another one imminent over failure to decertify @NYSDMV CDL authority after 5 people including two kids were killed that would still be alive if @FMCSA and @DOTInspectorGen responded to our 2022 requests. So many more dead @SecDuffy. Two more fraud lawsuits already filed individually.by @JimLambUSA under seal. Another contingent upon what @BarrsDerek does on freight broker transparency. We are not playing with public safety. We will confront public corruption @DOJFraudDiv. We will demand trial by jury to avoid corruption by Federal judges. We cannot be bought. @SocciLaw will zealously pursue justice. We trust you get the message. We are Hell bent on bringing the corruptocrats down. Either you are on the side of justice and righteousness or you are going down as part of the swamp. Ready or not, here we come... Remember, Congress... Truckers vote. TruckerVote.com

Be advised. We are done playing Mr. Nice guy. All Trucker Hell is about to break loose. One lawsuit already filed over UCR illegality and Privacy Act violations. Another one imminent over failure to decertify @NYSDMV CDL authority after 5 people including two kids were killed that would still be alive if @FMCSA and @DOTInspectorGen responded to our 2022 requests. So many more dead @SecDuffy. Two more fraud lawsuits already filed individually by @JimLambUSA under seal. Another contingent upon what @BarrsDerek does on freight broker transparency. We are not playing with public safety. We will confront public corruption @DOJFraudDiv. We will demand trial by jury to avoid corruption by Federal judges. We cannot be bought. @SocciLaw will zealously pursue justice. We trust you get the message. We are Hell bent on bringing the corruptocrats down. Either you are on the side of justice and righteousness or you are going down as part of the swamp. Ready or not, here we come... Remember, Congress... Truckers vote. TruckerVote.com

@BarrsDerek @FMCSA @USDOT @USDOTRapid > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2026 at 7:40 PM > From: "James Lamb" <JimLamb@usa.com> > To: "Minor, Larry" <larry.minor@dot.gov> > Cc: wendy.liberante@dot.gov, mary.pettit@dot.gov, Laurence.socci@soccilawfirm.com, derek.barrs@dot.gov > Subject: Re: Re: Request for Status of May 2026 Broker Transparency Rulemaking: RIN 2126-AC63 > > Larry, > > We are now confused here. Doesn't FMCSA tell OMB what the anticipated FR publication date is for them to publish in the 2026 Spring/Fall Unified Agenda? > > This rulemaking is "non-significant" according to the RIN, no? > > reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgend… > > Doesn't that mean OMB approval is not applicable? > > Doesn't that therefore mean you should know when you intend to publish the rulemaking in the FR and be able to advise the petitioner, industry, and public at this time and explain the length of the delay beyond what appeared in the 2025 Unified Agenda (May 2026)? > > As explained to Derek Barrs, this is an unreasonable delay after 6 years in our eyes... > > As you know, the rulemaking in question is in response to petitions we and then OOIDA filed in May of 2020. The agency took comments and held a listening session on this petition in late 2020. > > It issued a 2022 letter to us advising brokers were in fact required to comply with the broker regulations as it decided whether to grant or deny the SBTC's petition. > > In March of 2023, it then granted the SBTC and OOIDA petitions and stated the requested rulemaking would go forward, combining the SBTC and OOIDA petitions which were both focused on prohibiting waivers of 371.3 carrier rights in brokers' broker-carrier contracts. The agency simultaneously denied TIA's August 2020 petition to repeal the transparency rule outright. > > After numerous inquiries in 2023 and 2024 by both SBTC and OOIDA, the agency promised the rulemaking would happen in October of 2024. It did not. > > The agency finally commenced NPRM public notice and comment rulemaking in November of 2024. It reopened the comment period in early 2025 at our request. The agency collected nearly 7,000 comments, as I understand it, mostly in favor of a stronger 49 CFR 371.3 rate transparency rule. > > After TIA convinced SBA to ask the Secretary to scrap the rulemaking in 2025 in favor of negotiated rulemaking purportedly on behalf of small business brokers (we contend this was undue influence because TIA predominantly represents multi billion dollar brokers who are using the waiver language), which SBA Advocacy did, FMCSA announced in September of 2025 through the 2025 "Spring" Unified Agenda it would issue second NPRM in May of 2026. > > You now refers to this as supplemental rulemaking. I asked Administrator Barrs via email a few weeks back what I should tell stakeholders who were inquiring if the agency was still on schedule to issue this rulemaking in May of 2026. He said via email tell them yes. > > May 2026 has now come and gone and you are now advising there is no update available on a probable date for the rulemaking to be published. That seems disingenuous. > > As this started in May of 2020, and 7,000 comments were collected, no final rule was promulgated, the agency has promised to conduct rulemaking a second time in May 2026 for some unknown reason, and it is now June of 2026, the industry views this as a series of unreasonable delays. > > We now view this as a violation of the APA 5 USC 555. > > I need to know what to tell stakeholders who has been made to wait for relief long enough. > > Please give me something more definitive than we don't know. > > Please advise so we may know how to proceed. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > > /s/ JAMES LAMB, Executive Director  > Small Business in Transportation Coalition, Inc. ("SBTC") > aka Truckers.com  > smalltransportation.org > 1775 I. (Eye) Street, NW, Suite 1150 > Washington, DC 20006 > @theSBTC > (202) 587-2751

Freight brokers are like Land Rovers Shiny and appealing to those that don’t know any better But Everyone knowledgeable in the industry runs from them

@TruckerTalk @DanaGJournalist @FreightWaves @JohnHKingston @FW_Truck @OverdriveUpdate SBTC effects do not enforce guidance through @FMCSA request to protect new carriers unable to register for UCR due to technical MOTUS related difficulties.

I get tired of non-truckers having opinions on trucker shit.. SUPER CRINGE

@SecDuffy @BarrsDerek Almost 7,000 comments were filed on the November 2024 transparency in property broker transactions rulemaking initiated at SBTC's request on May 6, 2020 approved by FMCSA in March 2023 and the rulemaking was scraped in September 2025 after TIA convinced SBA Office of Advocacy to tell Secretary Duffy to start over with negotiated rulemaking at the 11th hour. Were they even read? The 2025 Unified Agenda promised a second NPRM in May 2026. It is now June 2026. Nothing. Nada. And the agency now says they don't know when it will happen. What is the point of 7,000 people commenting if the agency is going to pull delay stunts like this. Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss? This is a six year long kick the can unreasonable delay. Meanwhile, our executive director is still waiting for his 2016 FOIA request production TEN YEARS LATER. Obstruction? Something to hide? Something is VERY WRONG here at FMCSA, folks. VERY VERY WRONG.

I just told @FMCSA we have had enough of these unreasonable delays on freight broker transparency rulemaking in response to our May 2020 petition for rulemaking. When they asked me 'what do you mean by unreasonable delays,' that was all I could stand, I can't stands no more. @@SocciLaw This now appears ripe for a 5 USC 555 APA unreasonable delay petition for review to the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.

Tell @GordMagill @RobCarpenter @maybedanielleee @atutruckers that. Dominic Oliveira also an amateur advocate is responsible for a landmark Supreme Court decision for truck drivers. Not sure what universe you are in ... Maybe you are ATA ..