Working on climate policy. Former legislative intern. U of T grad in energy systems engineering and econ. Opinions = mine.

Joined September 2011
49 Photos and videos
It’s one thing for CBOC and Deloitte to do a bad job when the draft regs weren’t even out yet, but the PBO needs hold itself to a higher standard. Publishing analysis of GHG mitigation policies assuming zero GHG mitigation is available is just ridiculous. What’s the point?
Did the PBO actually do an analysis of the oil and gas cap assuming that a) the only way to reduce emissions in response to new policy was to reduce production; and b) that because pathways hasn't decided on an investment, that no ccus would happen in their analysis? Good grief.
1
2
7
2,716
We need honest dialogue about what it will cost to meet Canada’s GHG targets. Nobody is saying the cost of technology to avoid emissions is zero, or cheap. But the idea that zero tech is available, and the ONLY option is to shutter production should not be viewed as credible.
3
8
1,604
Sam Harrison retweeted
There's a much better way to use this trade war weapon. policyschool.ca/wp-content/u…
If this happens -- and it's a big IF -- Canada should impose an export tax equivalent to the US tariff on Canadian goods until the latter is removed. They're telling us where their pain point is. Let's use it. theglobeandmail.com/business…
4
17
44
11,521
Credible modeling matters, and can help policymakers and the public avoid unreasonable expectations about costs – either too high or too low – of taking action on climate change, and the policies we currently have in place to do so. We hope this op-ed contributes to that.
1
78
If anyone has questions, feel free to tweet me, or send me an email/text :)
56
Neat to be flipping through the federal budget and come across a callout box and figure citing your work. Congrats @ClimateInstit @enviroeconomics on the the ongoing high-impact of this report.
1
2
10
642
4. Here's the chart that was supposed to be attached to tweet #3.
1
3
12
42,792
5. Hopefully this will advance the debate on the fuel charge. It's not intuitive for most people that a tax could improve low-income families' real income - cutting the tax also cuts rebates, and for many households, this loss of income would be bigger than the savings on fuel.
2
4
19
2,222
Sam Harrison retweeted
Thanks Blake. Perhaps I'm like the guy in Monty Python saying "it's only a flesh wound!", while it's clear to everyone else it is something much more.
1
4
187