I build products that shift how people live; yours could be next. πŸš€β€’ I architect the backend, the product feels like $100M.✨ β€’Building in public β†’ $50K MRR. πŸ‘‡

Joined July 2022
345 Photos and videos
I honestly wonder why Apple chose not to add some simple things to their products. Is it just an OS-level limitation, or did they just choose not to? Like why is there no native clipboard? Remember they just added pause to video recordings not too long ago.
60
Samuel Osondu πŸ‘‘ retweeted
When you're deciding what to study in college, don't try to predict what will be valuable in the future, because that's so hard that you'll probably get it wrong. Instead focus on what you personally find most exciting. You can't get that wrong.
326
593
6,503
247,521
Samuel Osondu πŸ‘‘ retweeted
Mar 20
Massive props to this guy for pretty much carrying Cursor’s entire engineering and public image these past 2 days. People keep trolling, justified or not, and he keeps responding. I respect straightforward people like that. Hope Cursor is paying him well.
87
21
1,421
175,383
Samuel Osondu πŸ‘‘ retweeted
Congrats to the @cursor_ai team on the launch of Composer 2! We are proud to see Kimi-k2.5 provide the foundation. Seeing our model integrated effectively through Cursor's continued pretraining & high-compute RL training is the open model ecosystem we love to support. Note: Cursor accesses Kimi-k2.5 via @FireworksAI_HQ ' hosted RL and inference platform as part of an authorized commercial partnership.
516
1,378
20,272
3,531,111
This is really driving me crazy. How can I reach Apple on this please.
Is this normal, for goodness' sake? Even the support ticket sent since Monday has received no response. This is for Family Controls API approval; still no response. Why is Apple making things so difficult for people? 😭🀦🏿 Shockingly, updates to another app on the same account were approved just today. Wondering why they won't reply to the support ticket or even approve the Family Controls API request. After all the dedication to build something worthwhile, hitting this wall, when it's completely out of your control, is really frustrating! πŸ˜–
71
Samuel Osondu πŸ‘‘ retweeted
Is this normal, for goodness' sake? Even the support ticket sent since Monday has received no response. This is for Family Controls API approval; still no response. Why is Apple making things so difficult for people? 😭🀦🏿 Shockingly, updates to another app on the same account were approved just today. Wondering why they won't reply to the support ticket or even approve the Family Controls API request. After all the dedication to build something worthwhile, hitting this wall, when it's completely out of your control, is really frustrating! πŸ˜–
1
1
147
Every single day, something new emerges thanks to AI from big companies. ✨ Pretty amazing. I wonder how platforms like UxPilot and others can compete in this space.
Introducing the new @stitchbygoogle, Google’s vibe design platform that transforms natural language into high-fidelity designs in one seamless flow. 🎨Create with a smarter design agent: Describe a new business concept or app vision and see it take shape on an AI-native canvas. ⚑️ Iterate quickly: Stitch screens together into interactive prototypes and manage your brand with a portable design system. 🎀 Collaborate with voice: Use hands-free voice interactions to update layouts and explore new variations in real-time. Try it now (Age 18 only. Currently available in English and in countries where Gemini is supported.) β†’ stitch.withgoogle.com
40
𝐈𝐧 𝐭𝐑𝐞 π₯𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟏𝟐 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐑𝐬, 𝐚 𝐬𝐒𝐠𝐧𝐒𝐟𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐒𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐲 π›πšπœπ€πžπ§π 𝐜𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 π€πˆ-𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐒𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐝. But that phrase is widely misunderstood. Most people hear β€œAI-assisted” and imagine engineers letting AI write entire systems. That is not what is happening. And it should not be. There is an important difference betweenΒ AI-generated codeΒ andΒ AI-assisted engineering.
1
48
And no amount of automated testing surfaced it until real users interacted with the system. That experience reinforced something important for me. AI output must be reviewed with the same rigor you would apply to a junior engineer's pull request. Sometimes even more. The engineers who will thrive in this new environment are not the ones who resist AI. And they are not the ones who blindly trust it either. They are the engineers who develop the judgment to use it precisely.
1
17
Knowing when to trust the output. Knowing when to challenge it. And knowing when to discard it entirely. Because the real skill is no longer just writing code. It isΒ owning the system behind the code. And that may be the most important engineering skill of this decade. Most people are still trying to decide which side to be on. You might want to save this for a re-read. πŸ”–
14
I’ve been screaming this to people that still thinks ai is slop! x.com/samuelosondu_py/status…

Mar 14
You idiots think you can code better than OpenAI 4.6? Bro, the US military literally used it to capture Maduro. They wrote a prompt and one shot that dude and you really think it can't code your fucking shitty productivity app. You're actually high level retards. Put your ego aside and wake the fuck up. It's better coding than you will ever be.
1
69
Samuel Osondu πŸ‘‘ retweeted
Design build my dream CMS continued. Hopefully this weekend, I'll share how wicked this is and how I achieved all of this with @convex 0 Figma process but only @claudeai prompts.
10
5
128
9,722
The developers who survive AI won’t be the best coders. They’ll be the ones who stopped being precious about coding at all. The rest are already extinct. They just haven’t checked yet.
33
That’s the point. And it gets worse; they see AI output code, and because it doesn’t look like what they’ve been writing for years, it feels wrong. It’s not wrong. It’s just unfamiliar. There’s a difference. A model trained on engineers who started coding before you were born doesn’t need to write code that looks like yours. When it starts getting it wrong; it’s a you and prompt problem. That’s not an AI limitation. That’s a you limitation.
Devs are acting like they didn’t write slop code before AI.
1
77
There is no code AI cannot write. There is only code you haven't figured out how to prompt yet. That's not an AI problem, that's a YOU problem.
16
Samuel Osondu πŸ‘‘ retweeted
Mar 13
Building an app is 20% coding, 80% telling people it exists.
228
162
2,457
50,453