Where one idiot goes all idiots go, This is how conspiracy theories work. “Leaked memo.” “Eyes only.” “Federal authorities are investigating.” “Smoking gun.” Yet somehow nobody can produce the memo, identify who wrote it, show where it came from, explain how it was authenticated, or point to a single law enforcement agency confirming it exists. If Gavin Newsom’s office really had a document saying Democrats expected 350,000 illegal votes, it would be the biggest political story in America. There would be criminal investigations, subpoenas, arrests, and nonstop media coverage. Instead, it’s anonymous social media accounts yelling “trust me, bro.” Extraordinary claims require evidence. Produce the memo or stop pretending a screenshot of a rumor is proof of election fraud.

No, genius, nobody thinks a weapons program would hang a giant “WEAPONS LAB” sign on the door. That is not the point. The point is that you still have to prove weaponization, not just point at a pathogen and hyperventilate. Anthrax exists in nature. Ukraine has had anthrax outbreaks in livestock and contaminated soil for years. Public health labs study, detect, store, and secure dangerous pathogens precisely because those pathogens already exist and can kill people and animals. That is why disease surveillance exists. That is why threat reduction programs exist. That is why labs test for anthrax, plague, tularemia, brucellosis, and other dangerous agents. The U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency said its Ukraine program was designed to consolidate and secure pathogens, improve detection, diagnose outbreaks, and report disease threats. It also said the work was peaceful, subject to export-control measures and vetting, and did not sponsor gain-of-function research or human experimentation. That is not a confession to biological weapons. It is the exact opposite: securing dangerous materials so they are not stolen, mishandled, or weaponized. So “what were they doing with all the anthrax?” They were doing what disease labs do: detecting it, cataloging it, securing it, and monitoring outbreaks. The existence of anthrax in a lab is not proof of a weapons program any more than fentanyl in a DEA lab proves the DEA is running a cartel. Your argument is just suspicion pretending to be evidence. You start with “they had anthrax,” skip every required step, and land on “therefore bioweapons.” That's not reasoning. That's Russian propaganda with a cheap paint job.

I keep checking the weather for tomorrow. Not for where I live for Washington DC.

John Roberts thought, by giving trump full immunity from crimes, it will strengthen him to destroy the voting rights as his racist wet dream. Little he knew that trump will come after the judiciary and ultimately after him. Now the toddler he is, he’s complaining.

There's a little bit of Hunter Biden in all of us.

Obama used the situation room to get Bin Laden. Trump used the situation room to discuss how to squash his child raping scandal.

Sascha Riley, a young brave soldier, did his part when he came forward to tell the world that trump raped him as a child. Now the burden is on our shoulders to bring him Justice.

We have to stop electing representatives from strip clubs. She can introduce whatever resolution she wants. Congress can pass a symbolic resolution criticizing or ‘expunging’ the impeachments from its records. What Congress cannot do is change history. The Constitution provides no mechanism to undo an impeachment after it occurred. The convicted felon was impeached twice. Whether you think the impeachments were justified or not, that historical fact doesn’t disappear because a later Congress votes to pretend otherwise.

The amount of joy it gives me that he gets to see his stupid name chiseled off a real president’s memorial… 😈

🚨 BREAKING: Crews on scaffolding at the Kennedy Center, getting ready to chisel Trump’s name off the building like it’s overdue rent. Even the marble’s had enough. Welcome to the post-Trump cleanup crew, folks. 🧼😂 #TrumpFatigue #ByeFelicia

JD chief of staff abruptly quits. The rats are jumping the ship, tripping over each other. We may not have to rely on election to dislodge the regime. It is literally imploding by itself. Grab some popcorn and watch. l.smartnews.com/p-7TK6NEwE/D…

#BREAKING: McCaskill: “…who knew that the [White House] Situation Room was going to be the hallowed place where we talked about sex scandals that the president was afraid of coming out in public? And clearly there’s only ONE reason this stuff [#Epstein files] hasn’t been released. It’s not protecting the innocent, it’s not him worrying about the victims, it is just Donald Trump. There’s stuff in this file, and the article even references some of it…It’s weird to be talking about NIPPLES on the Deadline White House show, but they were talking about it in the Situation Room, over Donald Trump’s proclivity to have certain sexual activity with some of these girls…this isn’t going away…as always, the coverup is…worse than the crime…”😳

You loathed Obama because he’s Black. We loath Trump because he’s a 34x convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who lacks class, compassion, humility, empathy, understanding, kindness & common sense. I could go on or are you late for your KKK roundup?

What a dumbass. Randy, you don’t seem to understand who you’re threatening. Blue states generally contribute more to the federal treasury than they receive back. Many red states receive more federal spending than they contribute in federal taxes. So when you threaten to withhold federal grant money, you’re not putting blue states under pressure. You’re threatening states that are more dependent on federal funding than the states you’re angry at. In other words, your threat is backwards. You’re essentially saying, “Pass my bill or I’ll cut off money to states that rely on federal grants the most,” the red states. lol That’s not leverage. That’s a fundamental misunderstanding of how federal funding works. The irony is that if your goal is to punish blue states, you’re targeting one of the few areas where many red states have far more to lose. I’d think a member of Congress would know that.

Jimmy, this is not the slam dunk you think it is. The DOJ charged one woman with paying people on Skid Row to register to vote. That is a voter-registration crime, and she agreed to plead guilty. What it is not is proof that fraudulent ballots were cast. It is not proof that fraudulent ballots were counted. It is not proof that any election outcome was changed. And it certainly is not proof that California elections are fraudulent. You are taking a case involving one person and trying to stretch it into evidence that an entire state’s election system is corrupt. That is not investigation. That is storytelling. And given your history, people should be especially careful about accepting your conclusions without independently checking the evidence. Your ACORN videos were criticized by official investigations for selective editing and omitted context. You pleaded guilty in 2010 to entering federal property under false pretenses. You paid $100,000 to settle a lawsuit brought by a former ACORN employee. Project Veritas was later found liable by a federal jury for fraudulent misrepresentation and illegal wiretapping in a separate undercover-operation case. And you were removed from Project Veritas leadership after internal disputes and allegations about management and spending. So let’s stick to the facts. One woman committed a voter-registration offense. Now show the fraudulent ballots. Show the illegal votes that were counted. Show the election result that was changed. Because right now you are trying to turn registration fraud into election fraud, and those are not the same thing. It was a fair election he lost keep crying

Bless your heart Hey genius, that’s literally how election integrity is supposed to work. The letter doesn’t say their vote was rejected and can never be counted. It says the signature on the ballot envelope either didn’t match the signature on file or the envelope wasn’t signed, and it gives the voter multiple ways to verify their identity so the ballot can be counted. In other words, the system worked. For years people like you have claimed nobody checks signatures. Then someone gets a signature-cure letter proving signatures are being checked, and suddenly that’s evidence of a problem. No, it’s evidence of the safeguard working exactly as designed. Signatures change over time. People age. They get injured. They sign electronically instead of on paper. They rush. They develop arthritis. That’s why California gives voters an opportunity to cure a signature issue instead of immediately throwing their ballot away. And what does voter ID have to do with this? The county already knows who the voter is. That’s why they were able to compare the signature on the envelope to the signature in the voter registration record and contact the voter when there was a discrepancy. The letter literally provides a process for the voter to verify their identity and have their ballot counted. That’s not cheating. That’s not fraud. That’s not disenfranchisement. That’s election officials identifying a potential problem, contacting the voter, and giving them a chance to prove the ballot is theirs before it is counted. Which is exactly what everyone claiming they want election integrity should be supporting.

Obviously the Knicks game last night was rigged. Never in the history of basketball have the New York Knicks ever been beaten by the San Antonio Spurs in Game 3 of the NBA Finals. That alone should tell you something. in fact, in 1999 the Knicks won against the Spurs in game three of the finals. You knew the fix was in from the beginning when the Spurs had more points in the first five minutes than the Knicks. Where did those points come from? Who verified they were real points? Why were they allowed to count points after the game had already started? Then the Knicks came back and were leading at halftime. But somehow, mysteriously, that lead deteriorated as more San Antonio points started coming in. Very convenient. Then, in the final seconds, the Spurs scored again and suddenly the Knicks lost. Statistically impossible. And now the NBA will not even let the DOJ investigate. Nothing to see here, folks. Just another totally secure basketball game.

That is not what “statistically impossible” means. Raman passing Pratt was not statistically impossible. It was not even a statistical anomaly. There were still uncounted ballots. Those ballots were counted. More of them went to Raman than Pratt. That is how counting works. Pratt was ahead in the earlier count. Raman gained ground as later-counted mail ballots were added. Reports showed she moved narrowly ahead by about 3,000 votes, with more ballots still being processed. You can dislike that. You can be surprised by that. But surprise is not statistics. A statistical impossibility would require actual math showing the result could not reasonably occur under the known ballot universe. You have not shown that. You just declared it. “Late-counted ballots favored a Democratic city councilmember over a Republican in Los Angeles” is not evidence of fraud. It is one of the least shocking election developments imaginable. Evidence of fraud is evidence of fraud. Not understanding statistics is not evidence.

@RogerMarshallMD No, Roger, that’s not how screwworm spreads. There is no evidence that millions of migrants brought screwworm into the United States on their bodies or their pets. Screwworm is a livestock and wildlife parasite that had been moving north through Central America and Mexico for years. What’s especially strange about blaming Biden is that Biden’s USDA closed southern ports to Mexican cattle in 2024 after screwworm was detected in Mexico. The convicted felon's administration reopened those imports in February 2025 and then had to close them again a few months later as the threat continued moving north. So if we’re assigning political blame, explain why Biden is responsible for a parasite that reached Texas 17 months after he left office and during an administration that reversed his cattle-import restrictions. And if illegal immigration caused screwworm, explain why the United States eradicated it in 1966 while migration across the southern border continued for decades without a screwworm outbreak. This is a livestock parasite. It spreads through infested animals. Turning it into an immigration story doesn’t make it true. You are a member of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee, and you don't know what you're talking about? This is the most inept party in American political history.

It doesn’t matter who raises their hand. It matters how people voted. Spencer Pratt isn’t going to be the next mayor and was never the favorite to become mayor. Karen Bass is the incumbent and was backed by much of the Democratic establishment, including Democratic elected officials, party networks, labor organizations, major donors, and other institutional Democratic interests. They would've rather Pratt advanced because there's no way he could beat Bass. Nithya Raman is a much more serious threat because she appeals to many of the same voters Bass needs to win. Elections aren’t decided by comment sections. They’re decided by voters.