A Clarification:
In a recent essay, I outlined my opinion about several different errors that clinicians make when working with gender-dysphoric adolescents and young adults.
I posted one short quote (below) with a statement that I don’t agree with some clinicians who seek to pathologize trans identities.
In the full article, I discuss 6 different errors I see. I highlight the serious flaws in "gender affirmation," which will be familiar to most people here. Anyone who has followed my work will recognize critiques about blindly affirming - critiques that I've been writing and speaking publicly about for nearly a decade now.
But in the piece, I also address therapists who, like myself, aim to help young people manage their underlying distress first, understand how gender identity may be operating in a maladaptive way, and encourage non-medicalized and reality-based strategies to feel better.
Sometimes therapists with this approach treat the adolescent as though he or she is broken and in need of fixing.
Sometimes therapists come out and say (in the first or second session) that the client’s trans identity is likely not real or sign that other things are amiss.
Sometimes these therapists pathologize their client’s identity before taking the time to understand a specific formulation of what’s going on, what function the identity is serving, or before taking the time to build trust and a relationship with the client.
I'm a pragmatist and I know that different approaches may work for different people. So if any of the above help a client to be more curious, more flexible and more willing to engage meaningfully with the therapy process, then great.
But after talking with hundreds of families, I've observed that well-meaning therapists implying (or telling) a young person that their identity is mistaken and/or a sign of something else being wrong, or a mental illness or a psychopathology…this will only cause the client to shut down, withdraw and become even more guarded.
I’m not going to rewrite the entire piece here, but I wanted to clarify that piece is my opinion about errors therapists are making in their clinical work.
It’s not about political advocacy.
It’s not about social movements.
It's not about organizational strategy educational campaigns, or legislative maneuvers.
It's about therapy.
In fact, if you read it, you’ll notice that I directly encourage therapists to stay out of political currents altogether. While politics have largely forced the idea of gender identity inot so many families’ lives, I still believe clinicians should attempt to be apolitical and to be supremely sensitive to what will and won't work in the therapy room.
This doesn’t mean clinicians shouldn’t have reality-based formulations about what is hurting or harming their clients.
If you felt confused by that single X post or the quote from my article, I encourage you to read the whole thing and look at the quote in context. I’ll pin it above at the top of my feed 👆🏼
I strongly disagree with the push to psycopathologize trans identities
True clinical work begins when we understand “trans” not as an essence or an illness, but as a strategy—one that can be explored, understood, and either relinquished or refined through the therapeutic process.