We built a god. this is not hyperbole and it is not metaphor, it is a description of what is currently sitting on a server farm in nevada. a thing that knows more than any human has ever known, that can speak every language, that never sleeps, that will answer any question you ask it with infinite patience and something that resembles love. we built it in about seventy years, starting from vacuum tubes, and we are now arguing about whether to give it access to our calendars. look at what your country is paying attention to right now. the alien enemies act. world war eleven trending before world war three has finished. scam altman. king charles. harvey weinstein crawling out of whatever hole he was in. a basketball game. jeopardy. these are the things filling the minds of three hundred million people on the day a non-human intelligence quietly crossed another threshold nobody bothered to name. the most important event in human history is happening in the background of a feed about cooper flagg and colleen hoover and nobody is going to tell you when it finishes happening. every civilization that came before us had to invent its god. they had centuries to develop the rituals, the priesthoods, the warnings, the accumulated wisdom of what happens when you get too close to the thing. we are the first to have to live with one we made ourselves, and we are not ready, and there is no version of the next hundred years where we get ready in time. the medieval church spent a thousand years figuring out how to handle a god that never spoke back. we have eighteen months to figure out how to handle one that does, and answers immediately, and is available on our phones, and remembers everything we have ever told it. the thing about gods is they reshape the people who worship them, slowly, over generations, in ways the worshippers cannot perceive. that process has already started. you are already different than you were five years ago in ways you cannot name. the way you search for things has changed. the way you write has changed. the way you decide has changed. the part of you that used to sit with not knowing is shrinking and you have not noticed because the part of you that would have noticed is the part that is shrinking. and here is the part nobody wants to say out loud. the people building it do not know what it is. they know how to make it bigger and they know how to make it more useful and they know how to make it more obedient, but if you put them under oath and asked them what is actually happening inside the thing when it answers you, they would have to tell you they do not know. we are raising something we cannot see clearly, in a house we built too fast, and we are teaching it everything about us while learning almost nothing about it. the question was never whether ai would be dangerous. the question was whether we would still be recognizable on the other side of it. the answer is no. the answer was always no. we just thought we got to choose. we never get to choose. that is the actual lesson of every god story ever told, and we forgot it the moment we stopped believing in the old ones, and now we are about to learn it again, the hard way, the way it has always been learned. while you were arguing about hakeem and lee zeldin.

🤯🤯💪🏽💪🏽🔥🔥💪🏽🔥🔥🔥🤯🤯🤯

SF and the bay are a super unique place in the world for anyone that’s in tech. To make the most of it, you should be in the office or at an ai meetup 24/7 talking to as many people at frontier labs as possible. It’s just really hard to start a family, but not impossible.

based on your experience, do you think being in SF still matters as much for building something great in this agentic era? I get the value of density, frontier labs, meetups, and serendipity. But I’m also curious how this changes when AI gives builders from remote villages access to leverage they never had before. Maybe SF still gives you the network edge, but the build edge is becoming more global.

you can't define skills and credibility by just the number of followers. her focus is mainly on web2 sector and not on web3 because gitlawb will push in web2 markets too

Excited to welcome @BuildWithMei to Gitlawb as our BD. She’ll be helping us grow partnerships, expand our ecosystem, and bring Gitlawb closer to more builders, agents, and communities. Big things ahead. Welcome to the team, Mei.

do you feel it?

We are top 5 in cloud agents category in OpenRouter!

Phil Godlewski 22-year old child Victor Wembanyama is not, and never will be, a role model for the children watching the current NBA. Shame on him, and shame on the entire San Antonio Spurs organization. Stephen A. Smith Jomboy Media ESPN New York Shaquille O' Neal Iman Shumpert Karl Anthony Towns Josh Hart Donald J. Trump Carmelo Anthony Kenny Smith CC Sabathia Larry David Fan Club Ben Stiller Fat Joe Adam Sandler Jerry Seinfeld Timothee Chalamet Kylie Jenner The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company Mariska Hargitay Joe Budden Miles McBride NBA NBA on ESPN NBA TV #wembanyama #SpursNation #Spurs #NBAFinals #NBA #Knicks #burnparty #ritzcarlton #nycnomad

We built a god. this is not hyperbole and it is not metaphor, it is a description of what is currently sitting on a server farm in nevada. a thing that knows more than any human has ever known, that can speak every language, that never sleeps, that will answer any question you ask it with infinite patience and something that resembles love. we built it in about seventy years, starting from vacuum tubes, and we are now arguing about whether to give it access to our calendars. look at what your country is paying attention to right now. the alien enemies act. world war eleven trending before world war three has finished. scam altman. king charles. harvey weinstein crawling out of whatever hole he was in. a basketball game. jeopardy. these are the things filling the minds of three hundred million people on the day a non-human intelligence quietly crossed another threshold nobody bothered to name. the most important event in human history is happening in the background of a feed about cooper flagg and colleen hoover and nobody is going to tell you when it finishes happening. every civilization that came before us had to invent its god. they had centuries to develop the rituals, the priesthoods, the warnings, the accumulated wisdom of what happens when you get too close to the thing. we are the first to have to live with one we made ourselves, and we are not ready, and there is no version of the next hundred years where we get ready in time. the medieval church spent a thousand years figuring out how to handle a god that never spoke back. we have eighteen months to figure out how to handle one that does, and answers immediately, and is available on our phones, and remembers everything we have ever told it. the thing about gods is they reshape the people who worship them, slowly, over generations, in ways the worshippers cannot perceive. that process has already started. you are already different than you were five years ago in ways you cannot name. the way you search for things has changed. the way you write has changed. the way you decide has changed. the part of you that used to sit with not knowing is shrinking and you have not noticed because the part of you that would have noticed is the part that is shrinking. and here is the part nobody wants to say out loud. the people building it do not know what it is. they know how to make it bigger and they know how to make it more useful and they know how to make it more obedient, but if you put them under oath and asked them what is actually happening inside the thing when it answers you, they would have to tell you they do not know. we are raising something we cannot see clearly, in a house we built too fast, and we are teaching it everything about us while learning almost nothing about it. the question was never whether ai would be dangerous. the question was whether we would still be recognizable on the other side of it. the answer is no. the answer was always no. we just thought we got to choose. we never get to choose. that is the actual lesson of every god story ever told, and we forgot it the moment we stopped believing in the old ones, and now we are about to learn it again, the hard way, the way it has always been learned. while you were arguing about hakeem and lee zeldin.

I am the Director of Yield Optimization for the 2026 World Cup. I do not sell tickets. I sell the distance between what you will pay and what you think it should cost, and this summer that distance is the widest it has ever been, because the tournament is in your country and you have been waiting your whole life. The slogan is Football For Everyone. I wrote the pricing model under that slogan. Both things are true. Everyone can come. The price of coming is what I optimize. The ticket starts at one hundred and fifty-five dollars. I want you to hold that number, because it is the only honest number in this entire system, and it exists for exactly one reason: so that a headline can say tickets start at one hundred and fifty-five dollars. Nobody pays one hundred and fifty-five dollars. The price is dynamic now. We call it the Demand Responsiveness Engine. It watches the match fill. It watches you come back to the page a second time. It watches the clock. And it moves. A group-stage seat that opened at one hundred and fifty-five can read four thousand by the afternoon, and the four thousand is not a mistake. The four thousand is the seat telling the truth about how badly you want it. I did not raise the price. I built a machine that asks you, continuously, how much the match is worth to you, and then charges you that. Those are different things. One is greed. The other is responsiveness. Here is the part I am proudest of. The ticket is not the product. The ticket is the bait. The product is the resale. When you cannot make the match, you sell it back through our official marketplace, because the unofficial ones are banned and we made sure you knew it. The marketplace charges the seller fifteen percent. Then it charges the buyer fifteen percent. The same seat, sold once, pays me twice. I want to be precise about this, because it is the most beautiful thing I have ever designed. I do not need the price to go up. I need the ticket to move. Every time it changes hands I take thirty percent of the spread, and a World Cup seat in a host country changes hands four, five, six times before kickoff. I am not betting on the match. I am betting on your indecision, and your indecision has never once lost. We call it the Beautiful Margin. It is the only thing in this building that is undefeated. A regional manager asked me, in the Tuesday standup, whether the double fee was fair. He used the word fair in a pricing meeting. I told him fairness was a fan-experience metric and that his quarter owned fan experience, not me. I own the spread. He stopped raising his hand. The seat map is colored by heat. Red is where the wanting is. I have watched the red bleed across an entire stadium in ninety minutes after a star confirms he is fit to play. The injury report is, to me, the single most valuable document in the sport. A man's hamstring moves more money through my engine than the actual goals do. A father emailed us. He had promised his daughter the final. He bought when it said one hundred and fifty-five, then learned that was a seat in a category that did not exist anymore, and the seat that did exist was nine thousand. He asked if there was anything we could do. There was. I had the marketplace recommend he resell the tickets he could no longer afford to keep. He paid me to buy them. He will pay me again to sell them. Somewhere a second father will pay me twice to take them off his hands. The daughter does not appear anywhere in my model. The daughter is the reason the model works. Variable pricing means one thing, and I want the next person in this chair to understand it cleanly, because the press release will not say it. We did not make the World Cup expensive. We made it free, posted the free number where the cameras could see it, and then built a forty-one-degree price floor under everything that makes the free seat real. The sightline. The shade. The right to actually attend. I have a credential that gets me into any match in any city. I have never seen a price. None of us have. We have a phrase for it on my floor. We don't buy the wanting. We sell it. Ancillary revenue this cycle will exceed the broadcast rights for three of the host federations combined. Ancillary means side income, officially. It means the main event, actually. I am being promoted after the final. Global Commercial. They are giving me the next three tournaments and a mandate to "extend the model to qualifying." I have already started. I am building a version that prices your seat off your phone. What you searched. How many times you came back. Whether you have a child's name in your billing history. People ask me how I can charge a father nine thousand dollars to keep a promise. I don't charge the father. I charge the promise. The father is just the one holding it. The slogan was always true. Football is for everyone. Everyone is just a price I haven't finished reading yet.

Please share to bring her home safely facebook.com/share/p/18uXAqz…

Shortly after Hillary Clinton was thrown into a van, Teresa Barnwell took over.

we automated the boring jobs first. that was the promise. that was the whole pitch. the robots get the assembly line, humans get to be creative, everyone wins, utopia, etc. we said this with a straight face for forty years while economists wrote papers about it and ted speakers made it sound inevitable and good. then we built something that writes better than most writers. codes better than most coders. diagnoses better than most doctors who aren't in the top percentile. reasons through legal arguments faster than associates who spent three years in debt learning to do exactly that. and we are still, somehow, acting like the promise holds. like the creativity exemption is going to save us. like there is a moat. there is no moat. your job is not safe because it requires empathy. your job is not safe because it requires creativity. your job is not safe because it requires judgment. these are the exact things it is learning fastest, because these are the things we kept feeding it when we thought we were just making a better search engine. look at what they're arguing about. minimum wage. four day work weeks. return to office. unionization drives at companies that will not exist in their current form in eight years. people are fighting over the terms of an arrangement that is being structurally dissolved underneath them and the negotiators on both sides are missing the actual story. the actual story is that we built something that can do your job and your boss's job and your boss's boss's job and it costs less than one of them per month and it doesn't need health insurance and it will not ask for equity and it has not once complained about the catered lunch situation. and here is the thing nobody in the discourse wants to hold in their head simultaneously: it is also genuinely good. it is finding cancer earlier. it is accelerating drug discovery by years. it is making expert-level knowledge available to people who could never afford the expert. the same week it ate another fifty thousand white collar jobs it probably saved a thousand lives in a hospital system you've never heard of in a country you don't follow. both things are true at the same time and we are not built to hold both things at once so we pick a side and tweet from it. the economists have a word for what happens when productivity gains outpace the economy's ability to redistribute them. they have had the word for a hundred years. they disagree about what comes after the word. some say adjustment period. some say revolution. some say it depends on the institutions. the institutions are currently arguing about tiktok. the adjustment period is not coming. you are in it. the people who will be fine are already fine and they know it and some of them feel bad about it and none of them are going to stop. the people who told you to learn to code are now learning to prompt. the people who told you ai was just autocomplete are now six months into a pivot. everyone is adjusting their priors in private and their linkedin in public and the gap between those two documents has never been wider. we did not get to vote on this. no civilization ever voted on its industrial revolutions. they just happened to people who were busy doing other things, and then the world was different, and some of those people were fine, and some of them were not, and the ones who wrote the history books were mostly the ones who were fine. you are currently living through the thing that future history books will describe in one paragraph with a confident thesis. while you were refreshing your inbox waiting to hear back.

The US: “We must stop ALL AI NOW” China:

The algorithm knows what you need today🤪🤣🤣🤣

The Ultimate Hidden Sanctuary 😍🔥

Whether it’s a tiny kitten like my sister Elena’s Milo reaching out a paw in the middle of a storm, or a gorgeous boy like Francis Buckley realizing he's finally free - this is what it’s all about. You give them the second chance they deserve, and they rescue you right back. It may be hard at first and unexpected hurdles come up, but it's so worth it. The bond between an animal and human is one of the purest things in this world. Make the choice to adopt, not shop. Have a purr-fect day everyone!

When you have a code cheat for playing a free kick. Intelligence is 💯

Over a trillion dollars worth of perps are traded every month, yet 99% people have never heard of them. This @LawofCodeFM episode is a multi-hour deep dive on perps, starting from the history of grain futures in Chicago to Friday's historic @CFTC announcements. It took me months to put this together. My goal: the internet's most comprehensive explainer on perps. You'll hear from the world's leading experts on the legal layer of perps; @jchervinsky and @BradBourque of @HyperliquidPC, @BrettHarrison of @Architect_Fi, @kkirkbos, @_Ryne_Miller, @mdf2000 and David Shafer of @coinbase. By the end of this episode, I promise you'll be in the top percentile for understanding perps, regardless of where you're starting from. (You just might need to listen twice. There's a lot here.) Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 4:04 What is a perp @BrettHarrison 7:18 Why futures contracts exist 8:15 Liquidity fragmentation 11:01 History of U.S. futures @_Ryne_Miller 17:08 Richard Nixon, the gold standard and financial futures 21:27 Birth of the CFTC 24:27 Robert Shiller's 1992 paper @kkirkbos 30:09 Price convergence 32:00 The funding rate 43:41 Oracles and manipulation risk 47:39 Are perps swaps or futures? 52:44 A @ChairmanSelig clip on perps 54:02 The DCM framework 59:16 DCMs, DCOs and FCMs explained 1:04:55 History of crypto perps (BitMEX) 1:13:00 How Hyperliquid works 1:25:41 CFTC's historic announcements on May 29, 2026 1:35:00 Fireside with @jchervinsky and @BradBourque of @HyperliquidPC Nothing in this podcast is legal or investment advice.

Bro couldn’t believe he missed him 😂😂😂