CAVEAT EMPTOR (Buyer beware)
Everyone is looking at past Bitcoin cycles and asking: “Will we go lower, and if so, how much”
That’s a reasonable question, especially given that it’s fairly clear that some version of the Bitcoin 4-year cycle is still in play and analysts like
@benjamincowen have been very correct, directionally speaking.
But there is a very good chance that there’s a flaw in how many people are using historical data. This relates specifically to the assumed volatility of Bitcoin and, by extension, it may well apply to the assumed calendar of events (timeline) within the cycle (ie, a June low followed by an October bottom).
Many people are assuming that Bitcoin’s drawdowns will always look like its past drawdowns, while completely ignoring that Bitcoin’s upside has already changed significantly.
Consider this:
2018-2021 cycle:
• Bottom: $3.2k
• Top: $69k
• Gain: 21.6x
2022-2025 cycle:
• Bottom: $15.5k
• Top: $126k
• Gain: 8.1x
That’s a roughly 63% reduction in upside compared to the previous cycle.
If Bitcoin’s volatility is compressing as it matures, why would that only apply to the upside?
Applying the same compression to the previous cycle’s 77.5% drawdown would imply a drawdown of roughly 29% from the $126k high, suggesting a cycle low for 2026 near $89k.
Now, as we all now know, Bitcoin has already fallen more than 50%, well below $89,000 to $59,100.
In other words, the market has already experienced a correction far deeper than what a simple volatility compression model would predict.
Does that mean the bottom is definitely in? No.
But it does mean that investors waiting confidently for $55k or lower may be anchoring themselves to a version of Bitcoin that no longer exists.
Every cycle has brought:
• More liquidity
• More institutional ownership
• More global adoption
• Larger capital pools
• Lower volatility
The biggest risk for many people waiting to buy
$BTC may not be buying too early. It may be waiting for a drawdown level that never comes.
History doesn’t repeat. It rhymes.
And one of the strongest rhymes in Bitcoin’s 17-year history so far is volatility compression.
Those waiting for “one last crash” may discover they have to buy back at much higher prices than they expected.
There’s another important piece of context that many people are overlooking.
Historically, buying Bitcoin at or near its 200-week moving average (currently ~$61,200) has been one of the best long-term opportunities available in ANY asset class (Charlie Munger famously praised the wisdom of buying assets at their 200WMA).
The 200WMA has repeatedly marked periods of extreme pessimism, capitulation, and disbelief—precisely the moments when long-term investors are being offered the best risk-adjusted returns.
While there are never guarantees, Bitcoin’s history shows that those willing to accumulate near the 200WMA and hold through volatility have consistently been very well rewarded over multi-year time horizons.
More importantly, people don’t need to perfectly identify the exact bottom to achieve exceptional results. Whether someone bought near the 200WMA in 2015, 2019, 2020, or 2022, the difference between the exact low and the purchase price became largely irrelevant a few years later. The life-changing returns came from recognizing that Bitcoin was trading near a historically rare value zone and having the conviction to hold. The obsession with catching the absolute bottom often causes people to miss the much larger opportunity: owning Bitcoin at prices that, in hindsight, prove to have been extraordinarily attractive.
If Bitcoin ultimately reaches $250,000, $500,000, or beyond over the coming decade — which most people do — then the difference between buying at $60,000 versus $50,000 will matter far less than many people imagine today. The greater risk is not buying too early. It is spending months waiting for a lower price while Bitcoin quietly begins its next major advance.