As the two dominant powers in transformative AI, Washington and Beijing will determine whether it creates widely shared benefits or generates dangerous new risks. An AI model from either country could potentially be used to engineer a pathogen, launch cyberattacks, or create and disseminate realistic deepfakes — from anywhere in the world.
In
@ForeignAffairs,
@cqknight_ and I argue that a prudent U.S. risk mitigation strategy does not mean slowing down innovation. Instead, it means working with Beijing to come to an understanding of safety research priorities, to coordinate testing for vulnerabilities and implementing safeguards, and to jointly establish best practices to contain truly global risks.
Working together is necessary, and with the right approach, it is feasible. By focusing on how to look for risks rather than the specifics of what they find, Washington and Beijing can compete fiercely on AI while still mitigating the most extreme dangers it presents to the world.