The planned digital ID or "Britcard" 🤢 is the latest in a range of dystopian policies introduced by the Starmer regime and must be resisted at all costs. This excellent article explains how dangerous this will be for people in the UK zerohedge.com/geopolitical/u…

Online platforms, like Apple iOS/iPadOS/macOS, Android, Google Chrome and Microsoft Windows have parental controls that give parents the tools needed to restrict or block underage children access to social media. There absolutely no need for a government policy and law that blocks 16year olds from social media, or curfews that limit access after 9pm… Unless the plan is to make every person verify their online identity.

Under the pretext of protecting children, the UK will impose total social media controls for all UK adults and mandate ID disclosure (from early 2027). This comes with an already high risk of arrest for sharing disapproved-of thoughts via social media in the UK. This is all in lockstep with other nations. Australia became the first Western country to enforce a nationwide under-16 social media ban. Since then, Canada, France, Denmark, Greece, Spain, Italy, Germany, Austria, Poland, Belgium, Slovenia and Norway have proposed, backed, debated, or already operate similar age-restriction systems. Simultaneously, the UK already has roughly 450 to 515 AI data centres, with rapid expansion planned. Digital ID and AI data centres are part of the control grid. This will include a social credit scoring system to enforce compliant behaviour (a digital prison). Resisting these assaults on our civil liberties is essential, not just for us, but for our children and for all the future generations of humanity. Also remember that Tony Blair proposed that digital ID would be linked to our vaccination status, controlling movement based on what drug the state decides you must be injected with. As for protecting children with the social media ban, platforms like Apple iOS/iPadOS/macOS, Android, Google Chrome and Microsoft Windows have parental controls that give parents the tools needed to restrict or block underage children access to social media. This is not about protecting children, for which the UK government already has a terrible track record (remember the unethical and dangerous Covid vaccine rollout, ignoring parental consent, the industrial scale rape gangs....the list goes on).

My 17-year-old daughter: “I’m confused. We’ve always been taught not to share personal information or anything that identifies us online because it isn’t safe. Now they want us to do exactly that to access social media.”

Petition: Do not ban social media for under 16s. Petitions change nothing. Numbers do. Please sign and repost. petition.parliament.uk/petit…

STARMER BANS SOCIAL MEDIA FOR UNDER 16's IN THE UK! This means your Digital ID on its way. Starmer is playing the bad guy to Musk's good guy. The fact is that Starmer needs to do this because it is obvious that his government have funded Palantir via the MOD for a huge AI rollout across the UK and Palantir are in the AI business WITH ELON MUSK. People are being played...again This will be yet another reason (likely THE reason) you will have to provide ID to use social media, and that plays into Elon's everything App and the Digital Social Compliance Score with DATA being weaponised by Palantir. Wake up, they are all in business together and you can literally see for yourself the paper trail. A £241m military contract via the MOD was given to Palantir by Starmer. It only takes a second to find out that Elon Musk' xAI are in the AI business with Palantir. Musk is also in business with Peter Thiel (Palantir Co Founder) via SpaceX. They are laughing the Digital ID into place.

"Kier'll Fix It" ...for the gloablists. He'll make their wet dreams of a totally tyrannical, dystopian panopticon, digital gulag come true. It's NEVER for the children or their safety. It NEVER has been. For context; Jimmy Savile used the show 'Jim'll Fix It' (children and viewers wrote in with wishes, and Savile would 'fix it' for those dreams to come true) and his fame, and his access to vulnerable people to abuse children and young adults. The Crown Prosecution Service and Starmer - as the head of the CPS at the time he held ultimate institutional responsibility for everything the agency did or failed to do - refused to prosecute Savile.

Child safety starts with parents, not the state Children do not independently acquire smartphones These devices are bought, configured, and managed by parents or carers No child enters the online world without an adult making that decision first And parents already have tools available to them A parent who wants a child-lock on a phone can switch one on today - for free It is already built into modern devices Screen-time limits, app restrictions, and content filters exist right now and are widely available Despite these basic facts, the appalling Starmer is trying to rush in measures that would almost certainly mean EVERYONE has to provide ID to get online

“Adults can still access social media through age checks like facial recognition, digital IDs, passports and credit cards.” This is what this ban for the under-16s is REALLY about: identifying ALL adults under the guise of ‘protecting’ children. Anyone with half a brain knows this.

You know you're living in a healthy democracy when everyone has to pay for a VPN to stop the state from spying on them.

The Epstein Class at it's finest: if you don't agree with this 'under 16s ban' then you're defending pedophiles and groomers online. Coming from a literal pedophile protector... Mandelson and Saville come to mind. Look at this little rat scumbag - he can't even hide his glee. The face, the laugh, the inner demon is on full display for everyone to see. He is absolutely loving every single second of selling you out. This has absolutely nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with total, calculated control. The 'save the kids' narrative was always the bait; the real prize is absolute surveillance and the total destruction of an adult's right to a privat life. Worse than that; the sheep have signed us up for a real time, real world panopticon. It is not just online anymore - it is the physical rollout of automated 'social credit scores,' mandatory digital IDs, total biometric surveillance, and state-enforced behaviour management. They have handed this regime the keys to track your wallet, your movement, and your mind, ushering in a brutal era of dystopian control where stepping out of line means being deleted from society with a single keystroke. First step: they are stripping away online anonymity so they can harvest, track, and log every single move you make. Why else do you think they are aggressively building massive data centres across the country? It's not to host gaming servers - it's the storage infrastructure for a 24/7 wireless digital dragnet. It never has been, and never will be, about the children. While you are forced to submit facial biometrics and digital IDs just to open an app, MPs, Lords, civil servants and government allies will inevitably be exempt from having their phones screened and monitored. Rules for thee, but never for them. Well done, Britain. You had a golden opportunity to see through the 'save the children' lie and stop this dystopian lockdown in its tracks. Instead, you were far too busy falling for fake 'movements' designed to distract and divide, and sleepwalking straight into a digital cage. You stripped us ALL of our privacy, anonymity and freedoms and now you have exactly the totalitarian state you deserve. Enjoy the surveillance.

Age verification will require everyone to verify their age to use the internet. EVERYONE! That's the plan.

🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨 They dodge the laws they force on you. On us. The people! Do not take this lightly. Every MP is exempt. Every Lord is exempt. Every elite civil servant is exempt. EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT! They force the laws on us. They legally shield themselves. Total public surveillance. Total state secrecy. Absolute parasite immunity. The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy. If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way. 🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know! The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law. Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public. 1. The Divine Right of MPs The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016 The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister. The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable. 2. The Private Internet Loophole The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023 The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning. The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off. 3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments. The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote. 4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians. The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes. 💥 THE VERDICT This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque. They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it. 📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN) When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network). 🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act. 🕵️‍♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet. 💥 The Naked Truth Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened. Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress. Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you. FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers. So, what shall we do folks!? New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.

Ended again.? This war has had more comebacks than Cher.

Want to know how this is going to work? The state is weaponising this machinery to construct a frictionless digital panopticon, systematically replacing 'human discretion' with automated tyranny. By exploiting very real public fury over police 'misconduct' and 'human failures' (like the horrific handling of Henry Nowak and attempted beheading in Belfast) the state is performing a sinister sleight of hand (as planned). They are weaponising our distrust of the human badge to make us beg for the algorithmic cage, offering a clinical, 'unbiased' code as the solution to systemic corruption, when it is actually the ultimate tool for totalised state control. They are feeding thousands of hours of public CCTV, drone feeds, and body cam footage into algorithms to track your clothing, your vehicle, and your daily movements across entire cities. They deploy mobile surveillance vans and permanent biometric cameras into town centres to scan every single face in the crowd against centralised government watchlists, treating every passerby as a suspect in a permanent, digital lineup. The software is being used to aggressively strip, transcribe, and link your private data, social media histories (yes, the state actively intercepts, scrapes, and links your social media data into their investigative dragnet - shocker), and emergency calls, breaking down regional barriers to pool your life into a single, omniscient national registry. Even your local neighborhood is partitioned by predictive software that brands specific communities as future crime zones, justifying pre-emptive, heavy-handed policing before an offence has even occurred. Offender data is processed by unfeeling risk analytics to decide a persons likelihood of reoffending, turning algorithms into automated, unaccountable judges. The state is even turning this tech inward to 'hyper-efficiency,' using artificial intelligence to instantly draft police reports straight from body cam audio and route emergency calls through automated triage. This isn't about cutting desk work; it is about building a 'hyper-efficient,' self-authoring cage where algorithmic state surveillance operates constantly in the background without consent. The government and police chiefs are selling this technology as a 'common-sense modernisation tool' that saves taxpayers money and makes the public 'safer.' They pitch it as an invisible assistant that eliminates 'crippling desk work,' allowing officers to 'return to the streets.' Their marketing strategy focuses heavily on specific, positive sounding selling points, of course: Freeing up frontline officers: They claim automation will save six million hours of administrative desk work. They promise this directly translates to putting 3,000 more police officers back on the streets to tackle neighborhood crime. Catching dangerous criminals: They present live facial recognition as a vital tool to instantly find high-risk offenders, rapists, and terrorists hidden in large crowds. Protecting vulnerable people: They market the software as a lifesaving asset that can quickly track down missing children or dementia patients who wander off. Eliminating paperwork: They claim AI helps officers instantly draft incident reports from bodycam audio, meaning less time filling out forms and quicker 'justice for victims.' Stopping knife and gun crime: They frame predictive mapping as a way to send patrols to the right place at the right time, preventing violent crime before it happens. With the state now scraping our private lives to pre-program guilt, this isn't a warning from Minority Report....it is a full blown blueprint for a corporate/state panopticon where algorithmic pre-crime dictates human freedom. But we already knew that, didn't we? To read about this rollout from the official dystopian state perspective, with their polished veneer of deception, look directly at their propaganda; gov.uk/government/news/polic…

Digital Surveillance, Facial Recognition, 'Data Centres,' 15 Minute Cities, 'Under 16s' ban, VPN Ban, Digital Verification, AI Tech Towns (Barnsley, South Yorkshire), AI in court, AI in NHS, Palantir and of course UK Gov Digital Wallet (the real Digital ID - people tracking super cookie) bull shit pro-AI/pro-tech headlines... ALL PART OF THE SAME PLAN. When's the uprising? Oh that's right - people still don't see quite how catastrophic this is, nor the digital panopticon gulag we are speeding towards. Really didn't want this to be another 'we told you so'...

It's almost as if it was planned all along... Do people not realise the Online Safety Act is the silent engine that is driving the mass rollout of Digital ID across the UK? We tried to tell you in May 2021... That Act created the 'demand' for identity verification as a prelude to the Data (Use and Access) and Children's Wellbeing and Schools Acts. It's the classic playbook: engineer the problem, stoke the chaos, and sell the pre-planned 'solution.' Yet people still blind themselves to the trap, actively participating in building the very digital cage that locks them in.

If you enjoy, or appreciate our work on pubs, history, culture, and the overall content we create or share, kindly follow @Britains___Pubs (if you don't already) and share this post in order to help others find both the page and the subjects we cover. Thank you 🤝

When the govt talk about "protecting kids", they mean hardware backdoors in phones. There's no other way to make the age & ID check ironclad. Even if there are no backdoors (fat chance) linking the device to your ID kills online anonymity and free speech. That is the real goal.

There’s so much more I want to say and so much more to come out, this is just the tip of the iceberg as many of you know. David Sullivan has used classic abuser fear and litigation tactics to keep everyone silent from even mentioning his name, and his denial that any of it even happened is blatantly him just continuing to think he can gaslight the nation… I commend all the women that have come forward, the worst the ‘interview’ was for them, the harder it is to even think about it, let alone talk about it I know there are so many more out there, and I appeal to all to reach out to me with no fear of his power anymore For now I just want to wholeheartedly thank EVERYONE for all the support, thanks to all the journalists who have fought with us, as when the police let all the victims down, without the press help and putting serious time and millions of pounds resources into it, we women would have had no chance to speak about this man 🙏 To the real West Ham fans I salute you, with your help and support we can together make a difference for our daughters futures, stop them being groomed into sex work, and stop this pattern of the predator ever happening again To each and everyone of you thank you, those that know me know that I believe in people power and freedom of expression, peace, love,unity and respect, we are one ☝️ There’s much more of this story on what happened when I tried to talk about it on my YouTube and Substack, more to follow (link in bio) Thank you for listening 🙏🙏💪

Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all. signal.org/blog/pdfs/2026-06…