So this is a bit, right?

Very little of the world's suffering is caused by "hate." Most of it is from devaluing other people's lives. Bush didn't hate Iraqis, he was just willing to kill half a million of them

"Even her transphobia can feel, at times, like an imitation of male behavior: in trans women, she found a kind of woman toward whom she could direct the contemptuous misogyny of a right-wing man." 🎯

its gonna be a Hunter Biden summer (staying away from crack and reminding others that nobody is perfect and everyone makes mistakes)

CEOs are quietly realizing the AI replacement plan has a problem. Two problems, actually. One: the token costs for running AI agents are now exceeding what they were paying the employees they fired. Two: when the tokens run out, the AI stops. Just stops. No continuity. No workaround. Just a spinning wheel where your workforce used to be. You fired humans to save money and bought a subscription that bills you into a corner. The employees you let go knew what to do when things broke. The AI just invoices you for the outage. And then there’s the permission problem nobody wants to talk about. To do its job, the AI agent needs access. Full access. Your systems, your patents, your contracts, your future plans. Everything you spent years building, handed over to a process that has no loyalty, no discretion, and no skin in the game. You didn’t hire a replacement. You gave a stranger with no soul the keys to everything you own. Enjoy.

He’s typing in a search bar, quick show him the search option he’s looking for. Perfect. He typed the next letter that is also the next letter in the option we just showed him so take that option away and show him an option that doesn’t match at all

“Why don’t you just eat fucking ramen everyday? Just eat peanut butter and ramen for 50 years dumbass and invest all your money into the pico top of the gayest most fragile empire in history you dumbass idiot. Just starve and eat shit and dirt everyday for your entire life and then you can spend $30 on lunch when you’re old and about to die it’s simple. Don’t you know your 20’s are for grinding?? You’re supposed to eat shit for the majority of your life that’s why your ancestors built America. So you could eat shit and fucking die moron.”

Thank you I will adjust accordingly

If you need any more evidence that democratic congressional leadership supports the Iran war. They miscounted the votes so an actual co-sponsor of the bill had to vote against it to stop it from passing!

it’s simple. you call it twitter when you are speaking neutrally and you call it x the everything app when you’re deriding the platform

Esto es, realmente, un DELIRIO. Agarraron 2.245 currículums reales escritos por humanos y le pidieron a ChatGPT, DeepSeek y otros modelos que los reescriban. Mismo curriculum, experiencia, estudios... todo igual, solo que reescrito. Después, le mostraron pares al azar a cada IA y le pidieron que eligiera el mejor: el suyo contra el del humano. Todos se eligieron a sí mismos más del 95% de las veces. Incluso después de controlar por calidad (asegurándose de que el CV humano no fuera objetivamente peor) seguían eligiendo el suyo. Después, simularon procesos reales de selección en 24 industrias y descubrieron que, si usaste el mismo modelo que el reclutador, tenés entre 23% y 60% más chances de pasar el primer filtro. ¿Por qué pasa esto? Los autores tienen una hipótesis fuerte: cuando le pedís a un modelo que te mejore el CV, te lo reescribe con su huella estilística: sus palabras favoritas, su ritmo, su forma de armar oraciones... Cada IA tiene un estilo propio, como cada escritor tiene una letra. Después, cuando esa misma IA evalúa, se reconoce del otro lado y se pone un diez. Cuanto más capaz es el modelo, más afilada es su capacidad de reconocerse. Ahora buscar laburo es como el test de Turing pero al revés: en lugar de una máquina intentando convencerte de que es humana, parece que ahora somos nosotros los que tenemos que convencer a los robots que somos uno de ellos.

The Red/Blue button topic is interesting if only to see that people think there's a 'right' answer when it's more of a philosophical question that meant to out you for what type of person you are, be that empathetic, mistrusting, analytical, self-preserving, logical or morale.

It’s very revealing how much Team Red here is malding even though, in this hypothetical, they lose absolutely nothing in the other side winning. It is not enough for them that they win, it’s that the other side - the imagined “masses” - lose

One vote by a member who's not seeking reelection this cycle, so his district can't hold him accountable, and establishment Democrats can still pretend they tried to end this war. What a disgrace.

If you try to tell this story to friends they will think you are insane

It will never get better. And certainly not exponentially (AGI) better. It’s a next-word prediction machine that’s already illegally consumed all the valuable IP we’ve placed online. It can’t even handle customer service calls. i.e., it’s hype.

hiiiiii it's me! a classic centrist liberal! i'm here to log on and remind you again i have no vision for a better future! everyone who hates me is actually stupid, and the more i tell them that, the better i feel! this is working! i am the good guy?

Absolutely incredible… The Pam Bondi top.

Hearing a lot more about Hasan Piker than ever before. Seems he's a big player in the Democratic Party?