Carer. Musician. Voice specialist. Long hair. Beard. Orange Cat. Happily mistrustful. Comfortably cynical.

Joined June 2023
413 Photos and videos
Si Gil retweeted
B’H - 786 PUBLIC STATEMENT: Femi Mohammed – Speaking Out as a Muslim Participant of MP Rupert Lowe’s CrowdFunded Rape Gang Inquiry. PART 1 I am speaking out in the public interest, not only as a survivor myself, but for all women and girls of colour, Black and Muslim, whose voices have been systematically erased from the narrative of justice and accountability. I was encouraged to participate in Rupert Lowe’s Rape Gang Inquiry by Sammy Woodhouse, who was contacted by a family member regarding my cases. I submitted evidence starting in August 2025 and participated in stages 1 and 2 of the inquiry, signing consent forms for my inclusion. My communications took place via phone, messaging, email, video, and Teams meetings with Sammy Woodhouse, Nat Enderby, and Marlon West, during which I detailed my sexual assault, threats, and attacks on my life, and the corruption, collusion, and manipulation of my cases by institutional authorities who were supposed to protect me. After a call from Marlon West informing me that I had been allocated to give evidence at the hearings in London, a Teams meeting was held on the 7th January 2026 with Marlon West, Nat Enderby, and myself to discuss my victim statement, which I completed on the 8th January 2026. On the 23rd January 2026, Sammy Woodhouse personally messaged me to invite me to attend the inquiry hearings on the 4th February 2026, between 2–3 pm. I accepted the invitation on the 24th January 2026, and Sammy booked my train tickets, emailing them to me on the 26th January 2026. (Please see images for evidence) Within two days, everything changed, and I was removed from attending the hearings. On the 28th January 2026, I received a text message from Sammy Woodhouse asking me to call her; having spoken to her on numerous occasions, she did not seem her usual self and failed to provide a reason for my exclusion. Sammy Woodhouse is someone I had a lot of respect for, and it became apparent to me that the decision had come from someone at the top of the Inquiry. I felt betrayed and violated and was left in a state of shock, confusion, and despair. On the 29th January 2026, I received a generic email from Sammy Woodhouse stating that I would not be required to give evidence. The email was sent via Kerie, one of The Rape Gang Inquiry support advocates, rather than directly from Inquiry Lead Sammy Woodhouse herself. It offered no explanation for my removal post-selection. I responded directly to Sammy and Kerie, requesting clarification; Kerie replied that she would speak to Sammy and get back to me. The call from Kerie never came and I received no further communication from Sammy Woodhouse. On the 3rd February 2026, concerned about how my information would be used, I requested confirmation that my contributions and documents be permanently withdrawn from the inquiry records. (Please see images attached in Part 2, for evidence) My removal is not an isolated incident; it is part of a broader pattern of discrimination, racial profiling, and the silencing of women of colour, especially female Muslim victims, within the victim and survivor movement. Despite my efforts to bring these issues to light by reaching out to other survivors, I have faced a deliberate attempt to suppress my voice and experience. This reflects a disturbing trend where the narrative of sexual exploitation and violence is often confined to a narrow group of victims, driven by those who financially and publicly benefit from our trauma. In this system, it has become big business, where division is created and profit is made from the perpetual suffering of victims and survivors. CONTINUED IN PART 2 @Keir_Starmer @KemiBadenoch @ShabanaMahmood @KarlDenning @y_alibhai @AyoCaesar @faisalislam @TellMamaUK @ukhomeoffice #MuslimWomenMatter #UKMuslims #JusticeForSurvivors #NationalInquiry
78
279
750
371,399
Si Gil retweeted
I can absolutely believe you voted for this pathetic clown 3 times
I can't believe I voted for this pathetic clown 3 times. WTF? What a disgrace.
19
31
915
48,933
Si Gil retweeted
None of this was in the manifesto. He lied about his predecessor, lied to get elected as party leader, lied again to become PM. It's, essentially, a right-wing coup, carried out by a small elite of right-wing fanatics. Our media are complicit in not calling this out.
8
360
783
6,858
👇👇👇👇👇
Helen Whately says more than 4 million people now claim PIP and that the system is "handing out cash to stay home". There's just one problem. PIP isn't an out-of-work benefit. You can work and receive PIP. You can run a business and receive PIP. You can volunteer, study, pay tax and receive PIP. PIP exists because disabled people face extra costs, not because they're unemployed. What's frustrating is that buried underneath the rhetoric is a genuine point: too many disabled people aren't getting the support they need. But support means social care, Access to Work, workplace adjustments, accessible transport and timely healthcare. The success story being used to justify these reforms wasn't about cutting support. It was about investing in people. So before we start talking about "ripping up" the benefits system, perhaps we should ask why disabled people are still fighting for the basics that would help many of them participate in work and society. Disabled people are not a budget line. We're people. #WhingingWhatelyWeekly #HelenWhately #PIP #DisabilityRights #DisabledPeople
Si Gil retweeted
📢Let's be clear... Cutting social security support for disabled people would only make hardship and heath worse. And make it harder for people to get jobs.
6
144
281
3,587
Si Gil retweeted
Any action yet from @SussexPCC @KatyBourne ? Sussex Police apparently acted as the local MP's personal enforcers. Extraordinary.
We are not angry enough. Labour MP Peter Kyle had the police arrest his constituent in a dawn raid because…she emailed him about the Gaza genocide. He tried to put her in prison for exercising her democratic right. He tried to criminalise the act of speaking up about Gaza.
1
67
120
1,230
Si Gil retweeted
Remember, Adam says Muslims have outdated views on women.
134
757
6,795
105,786
Si Gil retweeted
In the not too distant future, the politicians and editors and news producers will be parroting, for the rest of their pitiful careers, ‘The legal advice we received at the time’, to juries, to government committees, to the parents and the children of the murdered.#GazaGenocide‌
42
892
3,439
43,323
Jun 17
RTing a lie published by a bunch of well-documented liars for likes is not the serious work of a people's representative to the mother of all parliaments which we're all paying for, you shocking, embarrassing platypus of a human
This is silly and offensive. Been proudly wearing #England’s flag today
6
34
Si Gil retweeted
.@RupertLowe10 says 250,000 white girls were raped by "primarily Pakistani Muslim men". Here are the official numbers: Casey's national audit (2025): 700 recorded group-based CSE offences in 2023. Police chiefs (NPCC): Pakistani suspects 13.7% of group gangs, white suspects 63%. Run his claim. 700 a year, 13.7% Pakistani, is about 96. Over 25 years, 2,400. The data is under-reported, so I will be generous and multiply it by 10. That's 24,000. And I will double it again to 48,000. Still a fifth of his number, with every assumption stacked in his favour. So either the figure is wrong. Or it is real. And if it is real, it cuts the other way too. White suspects are 63% of group gangs, four and a half times the Pakistani share. On his own number that is more than a million white-gang victims. Lowe says nothing about. And Casey records 500,000 children sexually abused every year in total. The largest group of perpetrators are white men. Either way the headline collapses on its own arithmetic. And more importantly, he appears to be weaponising victims and survivors for political gain. Pathetic.
627
1,262
4,060
363,552
Si Gil retweeted
This is just disabled hatred
1 in 4 people now report as disabled. But we can't afford to sign off 25% off the population. Bold action is needed. Not piecemeal tweaks. @Conservatives will rip up the current sickness benefits system and start again. This morning I'll kick off our review at @restate_thinks
5
34
131
1,846
Si Gil retweeted
If you take action against weapons manufacturers about Gaza you’re a terrorist If you email your MP about Gaza then they’ll engage in lawfare for a year, you’ll be charged and sent to trial, with the prosecution offering no evidence
28
356
728
18,301
Si Gil retweeted
Strange how this didn't make it to the BBC, Guardian etc. 🙄 Dawn raids by police for emails to MPs and in the end no case? Fascist tactics by a Labour government to terrify us into silence over genocide. doughtystreet.co.uk/news/bri…
2
16
44
593
Si Gil retweeted
Still no room for the scandalous news about Peter Kyle on websites run by @bhcitynews or @brightonargus. Or in any other mainstream media! Strange, really…. But it’s good nearly 200,000 have read about it on X and here: greghadfield.medium.com/excl…
5
167
296
3,361
Si Gil retweeted
Part of the problem is that sometimes what is lazily dismissed as "conspiracy theory" turns out to be "journalists neglecting to do their fucking job". x.com/lewis_goodall/status/1…
NEW: Peter Mandelson tells @TheNewsAgents the govt should repair its relationship with @elonmusk and suggests Musk may have been “primed” by Labour’s political opponents. We “should make it our business to connect…he's frankly got too big a footprint…to ignore him….I suspect [Musk] was probably wound up and primed by Labour's political opponents to influence the election campaign, and he sort of walked straight through that door.”
1
21
65
666
Si Gil retweeted
There is now clear evidence that the Great Israeli Real Estate event had unlawful activity at it. I've written to the Mayor of London to ask what he intends to do about it. This needs to be escalated immediately.
670
5,852
19,835
434,279
Si Gil retweeted
The UK economy basically works like this: Get paid £2,000. Give £900 to a landlord. Give £200 to the council. Give £150 to energy companies. Give £300 to supermarkets. Give £300 to car insurance and fuel. Spend the rest surviving until next payday. Then get lectured by someone who bought their house for £37,000 in 1988 about how you need to stop buying coffees and cancel subscriptions.
848
5,016
39,910
2,908,243
Jun 16
Good breakdown of why it's not really anything to do with "child safety."
I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this. The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home. There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered. What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business. Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not. This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy. That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids. What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes. Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming? No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.
20