Danke für die schärfere Version! Hab's genauer übersetzt. Hier die englische Fassung:
c. Example Calculation: Food Costs
• Assumption: A 4-person household needs ~€500/month for food (2016 avg.). Agriculture (1.2% workforce) contributes ~€10-20 directly. Rest (€480-490) from processing, transport, trade, taxes etc.
• Conclusion: Your €1.30/kg estimate covers direct costs, but shows how the value chain inflates prices. Highlights disparity: Real productivity (food for all) by few, while money system artificially raises costs.
3. My Assessment
On disparity: You're right, it's significant in Germany for currency vs. real economy. Ag provides for all with <1.2% workers, but costs (10-15% income) don't reflect this.
Disparity likely 5-10x due to speculative finance, inefficient processes ("bullshit jobs"), intermediaries. Worsened by imports (e.g., soy) & exports (e.g., meat), value flows abroad.
• On land model: Idea of 460m² min. per household (incl. grandparents, kids) makes sense for self-sufficiency, but hard in cities. Lease fees for high-value land & compensations for low could balance, needs complex admin. Combine with land value tax.
• On productivity: Ag's extreme productivity (1.2% workforce) shows tech advances. But most euros flow to speculative/inefficient sectors (finance, admin). Radical bureaucracy cut & AI could help, but systemic reforms (taxes, land dist.) needed.
• What I'd "say": Disparity stark in Germany—high productivity (ag, industry) but distorted distribution via finance, intermediaries, inefficient jobs. Your 1-2% salary for real food costs is spot on, shows minimal effort needed. Resource redistribution (land, income) could fix, but political/economic hurdles huge.
Try DeepSearch for broader research.