opinions are my own

Joined November 2016
167 Photos and videos
Many in Independence movement want 2 keep socialism & Alberta's welfare state. Many dont seem to know that HC is prov gov not Fed & that AB operates under same westminster system as Feds. Many blame fed policy as the reason 2 exit & want 2 preserve AB managerial state @JudyMaxB
Replying to @SharifHajiMLA
We deserve a separation of health and state Socialism is for evil or stupid people which are you
2
2
313
Many PPL in independence movement seem confused by thinking healthcare is a Ottawa/Fed gov responsibility. Its Prov gov. KW does not discuss AB govs westminster system OR its socialism or ABs managerial state. KW blames Feds policy as reason 2 exit not b/c Cdns arent free.
Replying to @Speaking4m
No one supporting Independence is a Socialist. Clearly we want to be free of Socialist policies from Ottawa The answer to your other question has been explained 100 times notably by @ikwilson Attached are a collection of information images to answer your question on how the new nation of Alberta will succeeded in being freer and more prosperous Thank you for your questions and open dialogue
8
WillowTree retweeted
Replying to @alandrummond2
Socialism always fails
2
8
69
876
Many who look 2 exit AB are exiting 4 policy where if successful, the new path seems 2 want AB gov 2 imalgamate Cda fed gov & keep same services even if it ends a policy. Seems the motivation 2 exit is not for freedom as most seem 2 want 2 keep single payer HC & welfare state.
Replying to @greg_scott84
There is only one reason an Albertan would want to stay in Canada:
13
WillowTree retweeted
That was the core of the message. Excellent podcast.
1
1
1
25
Thnx 2 @BridgeCityNews for covering a huge Cdn national issue.. Who else is keeping the PPL informed? @TheNational @CBC @City_tv @CTVNationalNews @GlobalNational @VassyKapelos @brianlilley
Supreme Court Skips Aboriginal Title Case The SCC didn’t rule — they simply refused to hear Wolastoqey First Nations’ appeal. No reasons given. The media called it “upholding” the NB decision? Not accurate. The Supreme Court had a shot at clarifying the relationship between private property and Aboriginal title. They turned it down, leaving Canada ... in muddy waters → and that’s no good for the security of property rights. Then there’s the bigger picture: what Professor Pardy calls the “category error” ... Get into it here: @PardyBruce joins @BridgeCityNews to review the ongoing landscape of uncertainty around property rights in Canada: youtube.com/watch?v=Z1RWCjD-…
1
53
Are they though Rita? "If all ur gonna do is have AB gov take over all of the things the Cdn fed gov does, [a progressive communitarian welfare state] what are U trying 2 achieve?"~@PardyBruce. @StayFreeAlberta @ATCAlberta @miss_tanyac @RonVoss5 @Pepina1980 @kathyflett1
Most Canadians want a “full service welfare state” yes. We’ve been programmed to think this is our best interests. The govt creates an impossible place to succeed, then offers you the handouts to survive. Ppl have been duped. The key 👉🏻 Albertans do not!! They are different!!!
2
104
& spprted by all prov govs Who in the independent movement has committed 2 end the cartels? All but Pardy, seem 2 want 2 merge Fed gov into AB Prov gov, only reversing role w/ AB at helm w/same framework. @realCTZN @Steele_MJ @hutchings_ruth @NadineWellwood @StayFreeAlberta
Canada is a collection of cartels. Grocery retail, telecoms, banks, airlines, dairy, universities, real estate, lawyers and other professions, and many more. Governments protect them. No reforms will be permitted that threaten their status. It’s not a “free market” economy.
1
45
There is no option for Albertans to exit federation in October.. Why are you saying there is?
As a true Albertan I will vote for Alberta Independence on October 19th. Not for me but for my future family and kids so they can have a prosperous future in the republic of Alberta. 🫡
41
Here Kyle.. If u truly dont understand it, Ron will help you.. @Smileyyeg
Kyle, I have a question for you: Do you know why Mitch Sylvestre’s first attempt got tied up in the court to be quashed by Justice Feasby on December 5, 2025?
1
86
Reforming Cda is an old hope likely 2 avoid risk of change. There's no checks & balances, no separation of powers & PM handpicks judges & lawmakers. Crown is protected not the PPL & no mechanism to change the constitution. Cdns by design arent free.. x.com/Probe_Media_/status/20…

I am on the fence over Alberta separatism, am offering both sides my analysis and advice. Feeding both wolves and seeing which one wins. Ask me anything!
1
2
203
Even Constitutionl Republic fails along w/direct democracy [majority rule/mob rule/rule by referendum] b/c the PPL still hav 2 rely on gov, 1s w/all the power, 2 ward of temptation 2 rob rights. Its fails thru history. Pardys model worx @dennisKalma @echipiuk @StayFreeAlberta
Constitutional Republic / constitutional monarchy are for that.
37
Here are many replies that show why the mob/the ppl, tyranny by the majority is not a good source of freedom to choose.. It steals individual freedom. @guyjbreton See replies in the thread..
The West won’t solve its current problems unless we move from representative democracy to direct democracy. We vote in political representatives on manifesto promises they immediately ignore upon gaining power, then do whatever they like between elections.
21
Will a new nation carry on Cda's 2 tier justice system, OR fix Cda's error by treating all PPL equally under the law? @StayFreeAlberta @DennisKalma @ABProsperityPrj @RonVoss5 @kathyflett1 @Pepina1980 @echipiuk @Martyupnorth @RiseOfAlberta @ATCAlberta @miss_tanyac
Individuals differ. Their capacities and characteristics are not "equal". They do not have "equal outcomes". But in a free country, they have the right to "equal treatment" of the law. They are subject to the same rules, and have the same roster of rights as everybody else.
4
7
638
Thank you Prof Pardy.. Do you see now Mitch @StayFreeAlberta that Cda's 2 tier system doesn't work & is a reason to exit Canada VS bring it along?
Individuals differ. Their capacities and characteristics are not "equal". They do not have "equal outcomes". But in a free country, they have the right to "equal treatment" of the law. They are subject to the same rules, and have the same roster of rights as everybody else.
11
Hear, hear!
Individuals differ. Their capacities and characteristics are not "equal". They do not have "equal outcomes". But in a free country, they have the right to "equal treatment" of the law. They are subject to the same rules, and have the same roster of rights as everybody else.
9
Here's an entire video on it @arsenalist
Alberta’s independence hinges on whether enough Albertans embrace the principles of self-sufficiency and independence to move away from collectivist thinking—otherwise the movement is “going nowhere,” warns Prof. @PardyBruce. @thecritcomp youtube.com/watch?v=NQDyl79a…
11
The entire basis for separation has been wrong from get go. @PardyBruce's stated repeatedly that exiting Cda for financial reasons wont succeed. If ABs not exiting Cda b/c Cdns aren't free, then there's no point in leaving for policy changes. Exiting means "embrace the unknown".
Agree. Which is why we did not copy anyone's model, neither for the fiscal plan nor the constitutional draft (I am the editor). Our assumption was maintaining the current royalty structure along with the current excise taxes, albeit with the federal portion of those taxes being remitted to Alberta. Likewise other forms of taxation we included in VoF, we just left them as they are today and added up the revenue they'd bring. In my opinion, I would think we'd get rid of all the excise tax/carbon tax kind of approaches and go to a simplified royalty that included the revenue raised by excise, if for no other reason than to just keep things simple. One point you raise I want to emphasize and that is Alberta cannot copy anybody. We need made-in-Alberta solutions that fit our situation.
1
51