Joined October 2018
137 Photos and videos
Bruce Pardy retweeted
BREAKING: Now that all the harm has been done and everyone has been paid off and promoted and the judges are aligned... Canadian mainstream media @globalnews reports about serious COVID vaccine injuries, and there is an avenue for "reconciliation". Like saying "sorry for the genocide".
92
720
1,643
46,438
Bruce Pardy retweeted
This is an excellent discussion about Alberta Independence between @NadineWellwood and @PardyBruce. The 10th question on the October referendum must be removed and a stand-alone referendum question must take place at a future date. Watch to learn more. šŸ‘‡
No question on Oct 19 is a better path forward. Danielle Smith, Killing Alberta Independence? Bruce Pardy on the 10th Qu... youtu.be/lhjzguRKVOE?si=HiVn… via @YouTube
1
4
8
682
Bruce Pardy retweeted
Danielle Smith, Killing Alberta Independence? Danielle Smith has openly opposed independence, built in delays/traps, and is now actively campaigning against it. The current referendum setup creates a double standard: Remain wins once and it’s over; Leave must win twice. šŸ„€Where does that leave the momentum for a new Alberta? @PardyBruce walks through the current reality with @NadineWellwood: youtube.com/watch?v=lhjzguRK… #AlbertaIndependence #FreeAlberta #DanielleSmith
2
10
21
597
Bruce Pardy retweeted
No question on Oct 19 is a better path forward. Danielle Smith, Killing Alberta Independence? Bruce Pardy on the 10th Qu... youtu.be/lhjzguRKVOE?si=HiVn… via @YouTube
3
11
20
2,486
Bruce Pardy retweeted
Supreme Court Skips Aboriginal Title Case The SCC didn’t rule — they simply refused to hear Wolastoqey First Nations’ appeal. No reasons given. The media called it ā€œupholdingā€ the NB decision? Not accurate. The Supreme Court had a shot at clarifying the relationship between private property and Aboriginal title. They turned it down, leaving Canada ... in muddy waters → and that’s no good for the security of property rights. Then there’s the bigger picture: what Professor Pardy calls the ā€œcategory errorā€ ... Get into it here: @PardyBruce joins @BridgeCityNews to review the ongoing landscape of uncertainty around property rights in Canada: youtube.com/watch?v=Z1RWCjD-…
5
5
736
Bruce Pardy retweeted
Tens of millions of Canadians will be required to age verify to use social media when the ban launches. My post on how the government plans to implement it without standards, privacy review, or an enforcement mechanism with potential exemptions years away. michaelgeist.ca/2026/06/the-…
25
210
408
32,580
Bruce Pardy retweeted
ā€œWhen it comes to Alberta independence, it’s time to hold up the mirror and be honest.ā€ For far too long, people have been unaware or willingly unaware as to Danielle Smith’s political machinations to ensure that the people would not be the ā€œor elseā€ in response to dissatisfaction with being shackled to Ottawa. A must watch for those who genuinely want to become aware of Danielle Smith’s political machinations to make sure that there would not be an actual referendum on independence. As Smith’s Minister of Justice, Mickey Amery, made clear in the Alberta Legislature on March 9th of this year, because of clause 2(4) being moved from the Citizen Initiative Act, where it killed the first attempted petition, to the Referendum Act, a referendum on independence ā€œwill simply not be allowedā€. His forecast has proven correct, but conveniently and fortunately for the fortunes of the United Conservative Party, it has cleverly been accomplished before an actual successful referendum question. Repost this far and wide. youtube.com/watch?v=lhjzguRK…
7
34
45
2,461
Canada is a collection of cartels. Grocery retail, telecoms, banks, airlines, dairy, universities, real estate, lawyers and other professions, and many more. Governments protect them. No reforms will be permitted that threaten their status. It’s not a ā€œfree marketā€ economy.
Loblaw, Metro, Sobeys, Costco, and Walmart control about 80% of Canada’s grocery market. That’s a $120 billion industry dominated by a handful of players deciding what ends up on our shelves and how much we pay for it. šŸ Will $1 billion of taxpayer money over 10 years fix the food inflation problem? šŸ Will $100 million a year actually change competition in a market this concentrated? 🧯 Or is this just another announcement designed to sound bigger than it is? Maybe the real focus should be on improving productivity, reducing red tape, and cutting waste, rather than simply throwing money at the problem. #cdnpoli #GroceryPrices #Inflation #Canada
56
321
790
16,263
Bruce Pardy retweeted
Replying to @echipiuk
Eva ur post literally spells out how AB&Fed gov hav topdown gov that protect STATE & collectivism NOT the individual, yet seems u dont spprt the only Independence path that busts authoritarian state for individual freedom [@PardyBruce's] Why? @thecritcomp youtube.com/watch?v=NQDyl79a…
2
4
1,300
Bruce Pardy retweeted
Canada’s ā€œconstitutional menaceā€ ... One group gets protected collective rights; everyone else gets insecure tenure subject to political whims. The result? Perpetual litigation, clouded titles, economic uncertainty, and division. True rule of law demands equal property rights for all, not a two-tier system that pits Aboriginal title against private ownership. @PardyBruce brucepardy.substack.com/p/wh…

šŸ”„ New Episode Alert: The Canadian Real Estate Investor Host @danielfoch sits down with law professor @PardyBruce to unpack one of Canada’s most dangerous legal grey zones: Aboriginal title vs. private fee simple ownership. Courts have spent decades building Aboriginal title law, yet they continue to dodge the central conflict: two competing systems both claiming exclusive control over the same land. Market confidence is eroding. Investment is suffering. Meanwhile, governments publicly defend private property while embedding UNDRIP and expanding Section 35 rights — creating what Pardy calls a two-tier constitutional system that treats citizens unequally and guarantees endless disputes. The result? A growing crisis of confidence in Canada’s property rights regime — economic drag, political tension, and reconciliation trade-offs that no one wants to squarely address. Clarity is urgently needed. #CanadianRealEstate #PropertyRights #AboriginalTitle youtube.com/watch?v=zVoYmT0V…
3
5
695
Bruce Pardy retweeted
It is hard to proceed with developing a property in Canada when you don't know whether you or aboriginals own the property. By @PardyBruce - Supreme Court kicks property crisis down the road fraserinstitute.org/commenta… "In late May, the Supreme Court of Canada ducked. Six months earlier, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal decided that Aboriginal title could not be declared against private property. The Aboriginal claimants tried to appeal to the Supreme Court. On May 28, the Court declined to hear the case. That doesn’t mean it upheld the decision. Instead, the Court has avoided giving guidance on an issue that is causing a crisis of confidence in Canadian property." When the Canadian Supreme Court court decision denying leave was announced, @CdnPressNews misreported the story. In his post Professor Pardy explains the outstanding issue and why the Supreme Court of Canada has yet to rule on the matter. In the meantime, if you want to buy or develop property anywhere in Canada, before acquiring the the title your lawyer will have to satisfy him or herself that there are no outstanding Aboriginal claims. (The concern is most immediate in British Columbia, but to the writer's understanding there are aboriginal land claims across Canada.) This will not be easy, as there is no registry system of claims, and the issue of whether an aboriginal claim out weighs a fee simple title has yet to be resolved. The end result?Your lawyer may have to tell you there is a cloud on the title which they cannot resolve, so thwarting your ability to obtain financing for your project. This issue will also impact those seeking to use their property as security for financing or refinancing purposes. Not a particularly good situation for Canadians.
4
3
398
Bruce Pardy retweeted
Professor @PardyBruce The Supreme Court of Canada just kicked the can down the road on one of the biggest threats to private property in Canadian history. The highest court had a chance to provide answers. Instead, they passed — and the crisis in confidence continues. fraserinstitute.org/commenta… #PropertyRights #AboriginalTitle #Canada #RuleOfLaw
1
8
24
781
Bruce Pardy retweeted
šŸ”„ New Episode Alert: The Canadian Real Estate Investor Host @danielfoch sits down with law professor @PardyBruce to unpack one of Canada’s most dangerous legal grey zones: Aboriginal title vs. private fee simple ownership. Courts have spent decades building Aboriginal title law, yet they continue to dodge the central conflict: two competing systems both claiming exclusive control over the same land. Market confidence is eroding. Investment is suffering. Meanwhile, governments publicly defend private property while embedding UNDRIP and expanding Section 35 rights — creating what Pardy calls a two-tier constitutional system that treats citizens unequally and guarantees endless disputes. The result? A growing crisis of confidence in Canada’s property rights regime — economic drag, political tension, and reconciliation trade-offs that no one wants to squarely address. Clarity is urgently needed. #CanadianRealEstate #PropertyRights #AboriginalTitle youtube.com/watch?v=zVoYmT0V…
1
5
6
1,811
Bruce Pardy retweeted
From @PardyBruce ā€œNo court has yet awarded privately owned land to an Aboriginal group. Can it be done? The Supreme Court of Canada has still not yet answered the question. The motion judge in the Wolastoqey case said that it can,The judge in the Cowichan implied that it couldā€
1
4
7
530
Bruce Pardy retweeted
Darren's well written comments are echoed by other First Nations people I have been in contact with.
LETTER FROM MEMBER OF A FIRST NATION TO MEMBERS OF THE FIRST NATION IN ALBERTA. " The chief and council you vote for was not built by your ancestors. It was built by the Crown to manage you. That is the origin of the system. Not self-determination. Administration. And Ottawa still decides who is allowed inside. The federal government determines who is a status Indian and who is not, registration, the second-generation cut-off, the decades of sex discrimination that took Bill C-31, then Bill C-3, then Bill S-3 to half-fix and still hasn’t fixed. Think about what that means. The government that built the band council also keeps the list of who counts as one of us. They define the membership and they define the office that membership votes for. We did not draw either line. They did. And then we are told the path to sovereignty runs through the very machinery they designed to deny it. So let’s look at the results, because results are the only honest measure. As of mid-2026 there are still thirty-eight long-term drinking water advisories in thirty-six First Nations communities. Neskantaga has been boiling its water since 1995, a child born there has now grown up, had children of their own, and never once drunk safely from the tap in their home community. Ottawa promised to end all of it by 2021. The deadline came and went. The water legislation, Bill C-61, got delayed again. One hundred and fifty-six advisories have been lifted since 2015 and we are still here, holding a cup of water up to the light and wondering. Ukraine got their money though........ For thirty years the water ran foul and no one called an emergency assembly. The children kept getting apprehended and no one filed an injunction. But the moment Alberta let its citizens circulate a petition, not to leave Confederation, not even to hold the referendum, just to ask whether the question of leaving could one day be put to a vote, the chiefs found their fight. Sturgeon Lake Cree, Athabasca Chipewyan, the Blackfoot Confederacy, Onion Lake, straight into the Court of King’s Bench to kill the petition on duty-to-consult grounds, treaty rallies on the legislature steps, the whole apparatus mobilized at speed to stop the question before it could ever reach a ballot. Sit with the absurdity of it. They did not kill a separation. They killed a question about whether to ask a question, the most preliminary, least binding step in the entire process, strangled in the cradle. And the thing they raced to bury was the best leverage our people have been handed in a century. When the Mohawks stood at Oka they stood for land, for the dead in their own burial ground, for their own people, their own honour. That is what resistance is for. The Alberta chiefs lined up to block a vote. They blocked democracy in the province the same way they have blocked it on their own reserves for three generations, where the same one or two surnames have held the council table for seventy-five years and called it tradition. A captured office defending a captured future, and calling the defense sovereignty. So no. I will not risk my liberty for that. I am not waiting for the band office to save me, I stopped a long time ago. The Crown built the cage in 1876, but the people guarding the door now look like us, and they have decided the cage is comfortable enough to keep. One hundred and fifty years is enough evidence. Sovereignty was never going to come from the men who throw away the one real chance at renegotiation because the old arrangement keeps them in their chairs, with full pockets. The cage was built in Ottawa, but the door is held from the inside now, and I am done asking the men in the doorway to move." Darren Grimes #alberta #abpoli #albertaindependence
5
43
154
3,129
Bruce Pardy retweeted
From @PardyBruce "In late May, the Supreme Court of Canada ducked. Six months earlier, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal decided that Aboriginal title could not be declared against private property. The Aboriginal claimants tried to appeal to the Supreme Court. On May 28, the Court declined to hear the case. That doesn’t mean it upheld the decision. Instead, the Court has avoided giving guidance on an issue that is causing a crisis of confidence in Canadian property." ..... "Dismissing an application for leave to appeal is not the same thing as upholding the decision. The Court has said nothing about the case. The last word, for now, on this issue in New Brunswick belongs to the Court of Appeal. But that decision does not bind courts in other provinces. ... No court has yet awarded privately owned land to an Aboriginal group. Can it be done? The Supreme Court of Canada has still not yet answered the question. The motion judge in the Wolastoqey case said that it can. The judge in the Cowichan implied that it could, but the Cowichan Tribes had not asked for the private property in Richmond to be handed over. Trying to discern the meaning of a leave dismissal is like trying to read tea leaves. There’s not much to go on. Predictions are not reliable. Maybe the Supreme Court agreed with the Court of Appeal. Maybe it didn’t. If the Supreme Court was interested in determining that Aboriginal title can prevail over fee simple title, this may not have been the case to do it. The procedural facts are messy. The private property owners are no longer part of the action. The Court would have had to decide whether Aboriginal title prevails over private property where the fee simple owners are not present to defend the claim. Nevertheless, the Court had an opportunity to clarify the relationship between Aboriginal title and private property. It declined. The uncertainty continues." fraserinstitute.org/commenta…
8
61
122
4,791
Bruce Pardy retweeted
Thanks for pointing this out Mitch.. "A new Alberta should reject the idea that legal rights depend on lineage. In a free country, laws apply not to distinctive peoples, but to people." ~Bruce Pardy x.com/PardyBruce/status/1929…

5
14
620