My opinions are my own. God bless 🇺🇸

Joined April 2013
146 Photos and videos
Splitty retweeted
No Kings explained for people who think they're fighting fascism. You're standing in a crowd on Saturday. You look around and think yeah. No Kings. This is what democracy looks like. Bro. You're holding a sign made by a communist billionaire who lives in Shanghai. You live in a constitutional republic. Elections. Term limits. A free press that spent four years calling the president a fascist without one journalist being arrested. The modern left's definition of fascism: You love your country? Fascist. You want to enforce the border? Racist. You think parents should raise their kids? Bigot. You want to know who's voting in your elections? Jim Crow. Being patriotic is fascism to the modern left. But every country has borders and enforces them. 176 countries require ID to vote. That's the definition of a country. But the Democratic establishment told you otherwise. And you believed them. Congress has a 15% approval rating. 80% of Americans disapprove. 97% of incumbents got re-elected. Chuck Schumer. 46 years. Longer than Stalin. Steny Hoyer. 45 years. Longer than Mao. Mitch McConnell. 42 years. 5x more than Napoleon. Nancy Pelosi. 39 years. Longer than Henry VIII. Maxine Waters. 35 years. Longer than Mussolini. Bernie Sanders. 35 years. Triple Hitler's entire reign. Trump. 5 years and 3 months. Won the popular vote and the electoral vote. But Trump is the king. Okay buddy. You don't hate kings. You hate kings that aren't yours. And Saturday they had you in the streets carrying their water. The Democratic Party installed a president without letting you vote. Biden quit on a Sunday. By Tuesday your queen was crowned. No primary. No debate. No ballot. First time since 1968. Three days before your march every Senate Democrat voted against photo ID to vote. During COVID you carried a vaccine card everywhere like a hall pass from the government just to eat at a restaurant. But getting a birth certificate or waiting two hours at the DMV to prove you're a citizen before you vote? That's oppression. The Democratic Party is pro illegal immigration. Counts non-citizens in the Census. Census determines congressional seats. More non-citizens means more seats means more power. No voter ID means no way to check. That's how you keep power without wearing a crown. Biden built a censorship machine. Pressured Facebook to suppress true information and admitted it in writing. Censored scientists. Censored doctors. Censored JOKES. The Biden White House told Facebook to remove "humor and satire." They literally went after people for making fun of them. UK does it better tho... Everything they censored turned out to be right. They just outsourced the silencing to Silicon Valley. And it doesn't stop at speech. The extreme left justifies taking children from families. Six thousand schools rewrite children's identities without telling parents. And the State has the right to intervene. The Hitler Youth did this. Mao's Red Guards did this. The Soviets built statues of a child who reported his own father. Same playbook. During Covid, your bakery got shut down. Church closed. You couldn't hold your dying mother's hand at the hospital. But thousands packed together during BLM to burn Minneapolis and THAT was essential civic engagement. Obviously. $2 billion in damage. 25 dead. 2,000 cops injured. 20 states burning. VP Kamala promoted a bail fund for the rioters. No investigation. No hearings. January 6. One building. Few hours. 1,000 prosecuted. Two years of televised hearings. Kings decide which violence counts. The left decided. Charlie Kirk spent his life walking onto campuses asking for honest debate. He was assassinated. CSIS terrorism database. 2025 is the first year in 30 years that left-wing attacks outnumber right-wing. Yet no one brings this up. 75% of liberal students say preventing a speaker from talking is justified. 27% say violence is acceptable. Liberals who went to Trump rallies: "I never felt unsafe." "The experience changed me." Conservatives who show up on liberal campuses get screamed at, blocked, and assassinated. One side talks. The other side screams. The Party for Socialism and Liberation marched with you Saturday. Their stated purpose in their own words: "Revolution." Not reform. Marxism. The system that killed a hundred million people last century. They had you holding their signs while they said it out loud. 500 groups. $3 billion in revenue. Pre-printed signs. The signs were ready before you were angry. The money leads to Neville Roy Singham. Billionaire in Shanghai. Attends CCP workshops. Funnels millions through shell companies at UPS mailboxes. Three Congressional committees have subpoenaed him as a suspected CCP foreign agent. You thought you were fighting for democracy. You were carrying water for Beijing. "Liberals are leaving the First Amendment behind." Spoken by the ACLU lawyer who defended Nazis in court because it was their constitutional right. Bill Clinton put 100,000 cops on the street. Reformed welfare. Said illegal immigration is wrong to a standing ovation. Told America the era of big government is over. Today his own party would call him a fascist. The 1990s Democrat defended free speech for Nazis. Yours censors doctors for telling the truth. The 1990s Democrat held open primaries. Yours installed a nominee without a vote. The 1990s Democrat trusted parents. Yours takes their children. Historians measure fascism across eight traits. Here's who checks the boxes in 2026: Censorship of political opposition. Democrats. Contempt for democratic process. Democrats. Tolerance of political violence. Democrats. State ideology forced on families. Democrats. Corporate-state fusion. Democrats. Scapegoating and manufactured enemies. Both sides. Cult of personality. Both sides. Ultranationalism. Republicans. Five for the left. One for the right. Two shared. You marched against kings on Saturday. You marched FOR kings. You just didn't know which was which. Stop being gaslit. I hope you understand what's at stake.
2,274
20,676
65,258
2,618,450
Splitty retweeted
🚨BREAKING: Iranians FLOOD into the streets of Western cities, waving flags and cheering the United States while celebrating the dawn of a FREE Iran. The Iranian people are done waiting they want their country back. 🇮🇷
1,529
22,733
71,810
3,631,874
Splitty retweeted
Iran just fired missiles at five countries simultaneously. Here is what actually happened to each of them. Bahrain. Confirmed hit on the US Navy Fifth Fleet headquarters. Bahrain’s own state news agency reported the strike. No casualty figures released yet. This is the command center for every American naval operation in the Persian Gulf. It was struck. UAE. Multiple missiles intercepted by Emirati air defenses. One civilian killed in Abu Dhabi from falling debris. The UAE defense ministry confirmed the intercepts. The Emirates just absorbed an act of war on its sovereign territory from a country it shares a maritime border with. Qatar. Missile intercepted. Zero damage. The Qatari Interior Ministry confirmed. The same country Iran just attacked is the country that hosted Al Udeid for twenty years as a gesture of regional balance. That balance ended this morning. Kuwait. KUNA state news agency confirmed missiles were “dealt with” in Kuwaiti airspace. No reported damage. Kuwait, which stayed neutral through every Gulf crisis since 1991, just had Iranian ballistic missiles flying over its cities. Jordan. Two Iranian ballistic missiles shot down by Jordanian military. Confirmed by the Jordanian armed forces directly. Jordan intercepted Iranian missiles in June 2025 as well. That was in defense of Israel. This time Iran targeted Jordan itself. Saudi Arabia. Fars News claims strikes. No confirmation from any Saudi source. No Tier 1 or Tier 2 verification. Either it did not happen or Riyadh is not yet ready to say it did. Both possibilities carry enormous implications. Now understand what Iran just accomplished strategically. In attempting to retaliate against Israel and America, the IRGC fired missiles at six sovereign nations in a single morning. Not one of those nations attacked Iran. Bahrain did not bomb Tehran. The UAE did not launch strikes on Isfahan. Qatar hosted diplomatic back channels. Kuwait maintained neutrality for three decades. Jordan was mediating. Iran just converted every neutral and semi-neutral state in the Gulf into a potential co-belligerent. Every nation whose airspace was violated, whose civilians were killed, whose sovereignty was breached now has legal and political justification to join whatever coalition forms next. And the damage tells the real story. One civilian dead from debris. Intercepts across four countries. No confirmed destruction of any US military asset. No reported American casualties among 40,000 troops in theater. Iran fired at the entire Gulf and the Gulf caught almost everything. Compare this to what Israel did to Tehran this morning. Precision strikes on the IRGC Intelligence Directorate. Explosions near the Supreme Leader’s office. Three detonations in central Tehran confirmed by Iranian state media itself. One side hit what it aimed at. The other side hit one civilian with debris. This is the asymmetry that will define the next 72 hours. Iran demonstrated intent to strike everywhere and capability to hit almost nothing. The Gulf states demonstrated they can defend themselves. And now those states must decide whether the country that just fired ballistic missiles across their borders gets to do it again. They will not let it happen again. Watch for the joint statement. Watch for airspace coordination between Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, Manama, and Kuwait City. Watch for the coalition that Iran just built against itself with a single salvo. Iran did not retaliate against Israel this morning. Iran gave every country in the Middle East a reason to retaliate against Iran.
1,584
10,355
39,641
16,720,206
Splitty retweeted
🧵 THREAD: The JB Pritzker Files Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker is positioning himself as the Democratic hero of 2028. But before the national press crowns him, let's look at what he's built. As always, patience as I pull the thread together. 👇
851
6,565
18,218
1,180,167
Splitty retweeted
🇺🇸 THE ULTIMATE AMERICAN REVENGE STORY 🇺🇸 ​The script couldn't have written it better. In 1989, Arthur Liu fled China as a political refugee after the Tiananmen Square massacre. He came to America with nothing but a dream for a free life. ​Decades later, his daughter Alysa Liu became the face of Team USA. ​But the CCP didn’t forget. Before the 2022 Beijing Olympics, the FBI uncovered a "brazen" spying operation. The target? Alysa and her father. The Chinese government tried to: ​Stalk them on U.S. soil. ​Intimidate her into silence. ​Pressure her to turn her back on the country that gave her family refuge. ​The FBI had to give them 24/7 security just so she could compete. 🛡️ ​She faced the intimidation. She refused to be a pawn. She walked away from the sport for two years to find her soul again—and then she came back with a vengeance. ​TODAY, THE STORY IS COMPLETE. In a flawless performance to Donna Summer’s “MacArthur Park,” Alysa Liu just did the impossible. ​🥇 OLYMPIC GOLD. 🥇 The first American woman to win individual gold in 24 years. ​She didn’t just skate for a medal. She skated for the freedom her father risked everything for. She didn’t just win for herself; she won for the flag that protected her family when the world felt small. ​This is what a Patriot looks like. 🇺🇸✨ ​#AlysaLiu #TeamUSA #OlympicGold #MilanoCortina2026 #AmericanDream #FigureSkating #USA #Inspiration
1,162
11,522
73,362
2,957,180
Splitty retweeted
🚨🚨🚨🔥🔥🔥 THIS IS NOT A CONSPIRACY. THIS IS NOT “RHETORIC.” THIS IS A FEDERAL CHARGING DOCUMENT. Read it slowly. Hotels. Children under twelve. Forced labor. Sex trafficking. Sleeping on floors with cockroaches crawling over them. Drug needles in stairwells. Narcan at the front desk because overdoses were routine. That is not a movie script. That is sworn federal language. Ten children rescued. Seventeen adults pulled out. Hundreds of thousands in cash seized. Fake crimes staged to game the visa system. Illegal aliens housed, hidden, transported, exploited. This is exactly how evil works. Quiet. Bureaucratic. Hidden behind “businesses.” Teeth as swords. Jaws as knives. Devouring the poor for profit. And notice this… It didn’t come from activists. It didn’t come from social media. It came from federal agents, affidavits, warrants, seizures. While people screamed about compassion… children were being sold. While people cried about enforcement… kids were being worked like property. While people said “don’t ask questions”… predators were protected. This is what happens when law is mocked, borders are erased, and accountability is called hate. God sees it. God exposes it. And when He does, it is never gentle. This is the generation Proverbs warned about. And now it’s documented.
113
2,788
5,490
104,946
Splitty retweeted
Alright, America, gather 'round because apparently we need a remedial civics lesson. I keep hearing folks scream about how we need MORE federal programs, MORE federal spending, MORE federal everything. And every time, I want to grab a copy of the Constitution and ask: "Have you people actually READ this thing? Or did you just use it as a coaster?" Let me break this down for the folks who are a few fries short of a Happy Meal when it comes to constitutional law. The Tenth Amendment. Say it with me. "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Not complicated. Not ambiguous. Pretty darn clear if you've got two brain cells to rub together. So what DOES Article I, Section 8 actually authorize Congress to do? Lay and collect taxes. Regulate INTERSTATE commerce. Establish post offices. Coin money. Provide for the common defense. Declare war. A handful of other specifically listed things. You know what's NOWHERE on that list? Healthcare. Housing. Food stamps. Energy assistance. Childcare subsidies. Retirement programs. Education. NOWHERE. James Madison, the guy we literally call the FATHER OF THE CONSTITUTION, spelled this out in Federalist No. 45 in language so plain even a squirrel could understand it: the powers delegated to the federal government "are few and defined," while state powers "are numerous and indefinite." FEW. AND. DEFINED. Yet here we sit with HHS running Medicaid, USDA running SNAP, HUD running Section 8, DOE running LIHEAP, and a bloated federal bureaucracy that would make King George blush. The Founders didn't fight a revolution so we could recreate a centralized monarchy with better PowerPoint presentations! And don't even get me started on Social Security. The Constitution grants Congress ZERO authority to establish mandatory retirement programs. States could handle this just fine with their own state-managed retirement accounts, but noooo, Washington knows best! States are too dumb to figure out how to run a retirement program, apparently. Never mind that they manage to run everything ELSE in their states. Hamilton himself, in Federalist No. 17, said matters like "the administration of private justice between the citizens of the same State, the supervision of agriculture and of other concerns of a similar nature...which are proper to be provided for by local legislation, can never be desirable cares of a general jurisdiction." Translation for those who aren't the sharpest tools in the shed: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULDN'T BE DOING THIS STUFF. The Supreme Court has said this REPEATEDLY. In United States v. Morrison (2000): "the Constitution requires a distinction between what is truly national and what is truly local." In NFIB v. Sebelius (2012): "the Framers gave Congress the power to regulate commerce, not to compel it." In Medina v. Planned Parenthood (2025): the Spending Clause "does not expressly endow Congress with the power to regulate conduct." So here's my call: IT'S TIME FOR THE SUPREME COURT TO DO ITS JOB. Strike down these unconstitutional programs. Return these powers to the STATES where they belong. If California wants to tax its citizens into oblivion to fund cradle-to-grave welfare, that's California's business. If Texas wants a different approach, that's Texas's right. THAT'S FEDERALISM. THAT'S WHAT THE FOUNDERS DESIGNED. And while we're at it, let's talk about SALT, the State and Local Tax deduction. You want unconstitutional? How about the federal government essentially SUBSIDIZING high-tax blue states by letting their residents deduct state taxes from federal returns? The rest of us are basically paying for New York and California's spending habits! If you want to live somewhere with sky-high state taxes, that's YOUR choice, but don't ask Ohio taxpayers to foot the bill. States should raise their OWN taxes for their OWN programs, period. This follows QUINN'S LAW #25 perfectly: "Liberals are great at giving away other people's money." They want the federal government to run everything because then they can force taxpayers in ALL fifty states to fund their pet projects. Can't get your state to approve universal pre-K? No problem! Just federalize it and make Nebraska pay for San Francisco's programs! And Quinn's Law #1 is on full display here too: "Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent." These programs were supposed to END poverty. Sixty years and TRILLIONS of dollars later, how's that working out? The poverty rate hasn't budged, but we've successfully created a permanent underclass dependent on government handouts voting for whoever promises to take more from others. Fun historical note: In 1963, Congressman Albert Herlong read 45 Communist Goals for America into the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD. Goal #32: "Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture." Goal #17: "Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism." Gee, does any of that sound familiar? Almost like there was a plan to concentrate power in Washington that certain people have been executing for decades... The beauty of federalism, as the Court recognized in Bond v. United States (2011), is that it "secures the freedom of the individual" by keeping governmental power "diffused." Concentrated power in Washington means LESS accountability, LESS responsiveness to local needs, and FEWER choices for citizens about how they want to live. Don't like Ohio's policies? Move to Oregon. Don't like Oregon's taxes? Move to Florida. That's FREEDOM. That's CHOICE. That's the CONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN. But instead we've got a federal government running programs it has absolutely NO constitutional authority to operate, funded by taxes it has no business collecting for these purposes, administered by bureaucrats who've never set foot in the communities they're supposedly "helping." The STATES should be raising taxes for welfare programs. The STATES should be running retirement systems. The STATES should be handling healthcare assistance. Not Washington. Not unelected bureaucrats. The STATES, accountable to their own citizens. It's time to return to constitutional governance. It's time for the Supreme Court to strike down this federal overreach. It's time to remember that we're supposed to be a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC with LIMITED federal powers, not a centralized administrative state where Washington decides everything for 330 million people. But what do I know? I'm just someone who actually read the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, and bothered to understand how this country was SUPPOSED to work. @elonmusk #TrendingNow #BreakingNews #Viral
375
1,398
3,296
79,398
Splitty retweeted
This is not a “both sides” issue. @TheDemocrats are responsible for this shutdown.
25
134
239
4,956
Splitty retweeted
28 Oct 2025
Replying to @hakeemjeffries
Watching Hakeem Jeffries lecture Republicans about a “healthcare crisis” is like watching a pickpocket file a missing wallet report while he’s still jingling the change in his own pocket. He knows exactly where the problem started because he designed it. The “enhanced” ACA subsidies he’s crying over were his party’s own creation. They were temporary by design. Democrats called them “temporary.” Every Democrat who voted knew they expired at the end of 2025. This wasn’t a Republican trap. It was a countdown clock Democrats built themselves. Now that time is running out, Jeffries wants to pretend Republicans broke the system. In reality, Democrats built a program with an expiration date and are angry that time still moves forward. The truth is simpler. The original ACA subsidies are staying. People earning between 100 and 400 percent of the federal poverty level will still receive ACA subsidies. What ends are the COVID era bonus payments that inflated eligibility and payout size. The foundation remains. The scaffolding is coming down. Republicans offered a Senate vote on a one year extension of those extra subsidies in exchange for reopening the government. Democrats said no. That vote would have forced senators to take a public stand, even Republicans from states where those subsidies are popular. Democrats didn’t want honesty. They wanted a headline. They chose outrage over outcome. By saying no, they also rejected funding for SNAP benefits, housing assistance, military pay, and salaries for hundreds of thousands of federal workers. Democrats knew exactly what they were doing. They wanted the crisis, not the cure. Now, Jeffries is claiming this could be fixed in a few weeks. If so, his party would have done it when they controlled Congress and the White House. They wrote the ACA. They wrote the enhancements. They wrote the expiration. The broken structure is theirs. Now that it is cracking under its own weight, they point at Republicans and shout sabotage. In contrast, Republicans want to control costs, not pay out of control insurers whatever they demand. Look what the Trump administration did when they tied U.S. drug prices to the most favored nation standard. Pilot agreements cut prices for several drugs by as much as 59 percent. That is reform that fixes the cause, not adds checks to the bill. This contrast in approaches coupled with Democrats’ refusal to engage in real reform, not just handing insurers more money, demonstrates that no, this cannot be fixed in a few weeks. One side believes in confronting the cost. The other believes in covering it with borrowed money and spin. The gap between those philosophies is not measured in weeks. This is not leadership. It is choreography. Empty movement performed for applause while the audience foots the bill. Jeffries helped build a system that rewards high prices, punishes work, and calls the damage progress. Watching him protest now is like watching a magician hand you a mirror and ask you to stare at your reflection while he slips your wallet into his pocket. He isn’t confused. He’s counting on everyone else being fooled.
2
7
29
2,659
Splitty retweeted
27 Oct 2025
Replying to @maziehirono
38
576
2,970
30,564
Splitty retweeted
25 Oct 2025
Replying to @PeteButtigieg
Taxpayers are done with subsidies! ACA was supposed to be self sustaining and affordable! Now we are expected to pay 80% of the premium increase in 2026? Nope. We’re done!
2
9
52
548
Splitty retweeted
11 Oct 2025
Replying to @RepJeffries
Fight to protect our healthcare?!? Where have you been for the last 15 years! Americans want you to FIX healthcare, not continue to fund a perpetually failing program (ObamaCare) with another bandaid subsidy for the umpteenth time. 🤔 The 200 million Americans on non-ACA, non-subsidized, employer-backed plans have seen their premiums double, triple, or even quadruple since ObamaCare passed and moreover nearly every plan available nowadays has a crippling high deductible, rendering “coverage” virtually unusable. More ObamaCare is not an acceptable solution. You do also realize that you knew these subsidies were expiring at the end of this year back in 2022. You had three years to advocate for your constituents and legislate a better health care solution for Americans, but instead you chose to wait until the very last minute, and here we are. Shame on you!
3
12
69
2,260
Splitty retweeted
21 Sep 2025
Goosebumps.
523
3,701
29,369
6,941,798
Splitty retweeted
I knew Charlie Kirk personally. Worked with him for nearly 10 years. He doesn't have a racist bone in his body. These low life negros just mad cause a white man out here saying what they don't have the courage to. Charlie was a man of God. Preaching the gospel more than them all.
5,978
29,952
180,552
5,077,654
Splitty retweeted
11 Sep 2025
A while ago, probably in 2017, I appeared on Tucker Carlson's Fox show to talk about God knows what. Afterwards a name I barely knew sent me a DM on twitter and told me I did a great job. It was Charlie Kirk, and that moment of kindness began a friendship that lasted until today. Charlie was fascinated by ideas and always willing to learn and change his mind. Like me, he was skeptical of Donald Trump in 2016. Like me, he came to see President Trump as the only figure capable of moving American politics away from the globalism that had dominated for our entire lives. When others were right, he learned from them. When he was right--as he usually was--he was generous. With Charlie, the attitude was never, "I told you so." But: "welcome." Charlie was one of the first people I called when I thought about running for senate in early 2021. I was interested but skeptical there was a pathway. We talked through everything, from the strategy to the fundraising to the grassroots of the movement he knew so well. He introduced me to some of the people who would run my campaign and also to Donald Trump Jr. "Like his dad, he's misunderstood. He's extremely smart, and very much on our wavelength." Don took a call from me because Charlie asked him too. Long before I ever committed (even in my mind) to running, Charlie had me speak to his donors at a TPUSA event. He walked me around the room and introduced me. He gave me honest feedback on my remarks. He had no reason to do this, no expectation that I'd go anywhere. I was polling, at that point, well below 5 percent. He did it because we were friends, and because he was a good man. When I became the VP nominee--something Charlie advocated for both in public and private--Charlie was there for me. I was so glad to be part of the president's team, but candidly surprised by the effect it had on our family. Our kids, especially our oldest, struggled with the attention and the constant presence of the protective detail. I felt this acute sense of guilt, that I had conscripted my kids into this life without getting their permission. And Charlie was constantly calling and texting, checking on our family and offering guidance and prayers. Some of our most successful events were organized not by the campaign, but by TPUSA. He wasn't just a thinker, he was a doer, turning big ideas into bigger events with thousands of activists. And after every event, he would give me a big hug, tell me he was praying for me, and ask me what he could do. "You focus on Wisconsin," he'd tell me. "Arizona is in the bag." And it was. Charlie genuinely believed in and loved Jesus Christ. He had a profound faith. We used to argue about Catholicism and Protestantism and who was right about minor doctrinal questions. Because he loved God, he wanted to understand him. Someone else pointed out that Charlie died doing what he loved: discussing ideas. He would go into these hostile crowds and answer their questions. If it was a friendly crowd, and a progressive asked a question to jeers from the audience, he'd encourage his fans to calm down and let everyone speak. He exemplified a foundational virtue of our Republic: the willingness to speak openly and debate ideas. Charlie had an uncanny ability to know when to push the envelope and when to be more conventional. I've seen people attack him for years for being wrong on this or that issue publicly, never realizing that privately he was working to broaden the scope of acceptable debate. He was a great family man. I was talking to President Trump in the Oval Office today, and he said, "I know he was a very good friend of yours." I nodded silently, and President Trump observed that Charlie really loved his family. The president was right. Charlie was so proud of Erika and the two kids. He was so happy to be a father. And he felt such gratitude for having found a woman of God with whom he could build a family. Charlie Kirk was a true friend. The kind of guy you could say something to and know it would always stay with him. I am on more than a few group chats with Charlie and people he introduced me to over the years. We celebrate weddings and babies, bust each other's chops, and mourn the loss of loved ones. We talk about politics and policy and sports and life. These group chats include people at the very highest level of our government. They trusted him, loved him, and knew he'd always have their backs. And because he was a true friend ,you could instinctively trust the people Charlie introduced you to. So much of the success we've had in this administration traces directly to Charlie's ability to organize and convene. He didn't just help us win in 2024, he helped us staff the entire government. I was in a meeting in the West Wing when those group chats started lighting up with people telling Charlie they were praying for him. And that's how I learned the news that my friend had been shot. I prayed a lot over the next hour, as first good news and then bad trickled in. God didn't answer those prayers, and that's OK. He had other plans. And now that Charlie is in heaven, I'll ask him to talk to big man directly on behalf of his family, his friends, and the country he loved so dearly. You ran a good race, my friend. We've got it from here.
15,052
77,176
533,066
15,018,680
Splitty retweeted
You did what career politicians promised to do, and that is to be transparent and respect the American public enough to show us where our money was being wasted. It’s was true heroism to give up being worshiped for tackling climate change not just through words but through action, to having the same people who praised you try to destroy you for restoring free speech and exposing waste and abuse. You stepping into the political arena may have saved our country. It may take years for some people to appreciate your actions, but know that many people do. @elonmusk: Thanks.
73
190
1,166
8,415
Splitty retweeted
Let’s talk about the department of education 🤝
1,715
14,910
61,354
1,759,394
Splitty retweeted
11 Mar 2025
What fixing government computer systems feels like
28,707
56,116
622,342
67,801,933
Splitty retweeted
I stand with @Tesla and @elonmusk.
2,923
9,794
56,179
935,567