This is a very interesting discussion because many people tend to confuse certain concepts, and it’s important not to dismiss their comments. Instead, we should aim to explain and debunk myths. For example, when we use the word “theory” in a scientific context, it does not mean mere conjecture. A scientific theory is supported by evidence that matches observations.
In this context, evolution is not just a theory—it’s a fact. Let’s examine the evidence: we have fossils showing extinct species with similarities to existing animals, providing a clear link. Additionally, we have genetic evidence that allows us to trace genetic material back in time, including how control genes work in embryos. We understand the mechanisms of evolution, how genes evolve, how to calculate mutation rates, and we have the statistical tools to perform these calculations. Do we know everything? No, but that’s why people like
@theAliceRoberts continue to investigate and explain these processes. Did like a lot of the Human evolution ones.
If you have children, you understand evolution on a basic level; they resemble you, but their genetic material is not an exact copy. There are variations, some significant and others less so.
The same level of evidence applies to general relativity. We have numerous examples of evidence, including black holes, gravitational lensing, and even the functioning of GPS systems, which depend on the principles of general relativity. However, there remains an issue with its incompatibility with another theory: quantum mechanics.
Now, the Big Bang is a theory that attempts to explain how the universe came into existence, based on observations and assumptions. We have evidence like the cosmic microwave background, but it remains a theory because it tries to explain very complex processes, such as inflation, which are not yet fully understood. We might know more if there hadn’t been so much focus on string theory, which, at this point, is more about mathematical equations than concrete evidence. For more on this, you can listen to
@ericweinstein or
@skdh, who are excellent at breaking down these concepts.
I hope this clarifies things. My main point is that everyone is entitled to their beliefs, but it’s essential to distinguish between personal opinions and factual evidence. If you want to discuss facts, make sure you have the “receipts”; otherwise, it’s best to leave the discussion to those who are well-versed in the subject. Always happy to discuss.