It's an important feature for Tezos to let governance of different parts of the protocol take place in parallel, without a giant single threaded lock on the whole protocol. This is difficult to achieve in general, but in some cases, like adjusting parameters, it's feasible, and that's amazing.
People looking to stoke controversy to get attention are going to make up a lot of nonsensical arguments against the liquidity baking toggle. What are the consequences?
Liquidity Baking (LB) is IMO a net positive but relatively unimportant, it can go.
However the damage done by fudding a useful signalling mechanism goes well beyond LB, it nukes an entire avenue for parallel governance of Tezos. Regardless of your opinion on the merit of LB, you should not tolerate this kind of drivel, it's corrosive.
Dear Tezos bakers, there is now a proposal to sunset Liquidity Baking. If you'd like to sunset it, you can set a flag in your blocks and it will sunset automatically once it reaches a threshold. There's a built in off switch, it works, you can use it. Don't let anyone bamboozle you by telling you otherwise.