Pro Woman Account

Joined August 2019
5,228 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
This is one of the reasons I repost many, many, much lots of TERF content on here. I'm over 150,000 posts, and most of them (by far) are reposts, replies and quote posts. Because I want TERFs to be seen, and for our position to be clear. I don't necessarily look at WHO is posting so much as WHAT they are posting - and if it is good I repost, like, quote-post, or reply - sometimes all 4. I get people and profiles mixed up. I repost things that are written by women who dislike me immensely. I emphatically disagree with women (GCs and TERFs) on some things (pronouns for example) and emphatically agree with them on others (pregnant men?) - and I will always let my opinions be known. Because that is how we advance the cause of women. By being heard and thrashing out our differences without thrashing each other in the process. I'm not in this to boost my account stats. In fact, I can't wait for the day I can close this account. I'm in this to raise the profile of women (in particular) who are speaking out about the destruction of our rights and our ability to associate freely to the exclusion of all men. I encourage women who see something I post that they particularly like and that they agree with to cut and paste it and make their own post out of it. Reword it if you like. There is no need to credit me. I don't care about being credited - I care about the message getting out there from as many women as possible that men are not women and allowing them to legally identify into our sex is catastrophic to the rights and safety of every woman and child. Women are not a niche issue, or a cultural backwater and we have to force that realisation on everyone, politically, socially, professionally, medically - EVERYWHERE! Including on here. Women don't have to like each other to agree with each other, and it doesn't mean we dislike each other when we disagree. We can be robust. We can be respectful. We can swear, swipe or swoon. But we are all doing it in the same cause. Women. x.com/i/grok/share/788bc3d0e…
I don’t know how I can reach people to tell them this. If you are wondering why your reach is so low it is because X now penalizes people for using X. Talk about a subject too much? Penalized. Have a conversation. Penalized. I doubt anyone will see this. I’m penalized.
15
53
178
6,338
Janet Inglis retweeted
It is not offensive to be called a Man. 'You're a man' is not an insult.
1
2
14
235
Janet Inglis retweeted
It wasn't another female. It was a teenaged boy who stuck his fingers up a 15 year old girl's vagina. She protested clearly at the time. We can see her distress clearly in the video as he is doing it to her. We can hear her call out for assistance right then and there. She didn't know that was a male doing that to her. She thought he was a female. Kallie had been wrestling against females for over 12 years and that had never been done to her. This was her first time wrestling against a male. And he stuck his fingers into her vagina for several seconds. Why? You can see from the video that he was winning the event. So why did he stick his fingers into her vagina? Why did he think 'I'll stick my fingers into her vagina', and then do it when it wasn't needed for him to win the event?
1
13
Janet Inglis retweeted
Language is the first step in softening the image of men we don't know. Tell a child a man is a 'Woman' and besides the initial confusion, the image in a child's mind of a strange woman is vastly different and safer than that of a strange man. That poor little child. Children are the ultimate prize, but they have to go through women before they can get to them. And they're doing that by passing themselves off as women. Because we are the safe sex.
1
5
18
321
Janet Inglis retweeted
This Facebook comment made me a bit sad. I wanted to say “he’s mocking you Karen, he’s mocking your name and your profession and your sex and most probably your age. He dresses up and pretends to be you to mock you with gender stereotypes that imply you are stupid and a massive pain in the arse to society. Then he goes back to his male privilege and mocks us all with his legally protected and socially celebrated ability to laugh at you.”
1
15
283
Janet Inglis retweeted
Replying to @ThatAussieWoman
1
69
Janet Inglis retweeted
Like all men-who-claim-to-be-women, he's a coward and will only bully women and never try it on with other men.
1
1
62
Janet Inglis retweeted
I hope so. Just look at him gearing up for it in the milliseconds before he physically strikes out at the woman. Her lined her up, readied himself, and then struck out - knowing full well that he was in a position of physical superiority. He knew what he was going to do and he prepped himself before he delivered the blow. It was so obviously an intentional physical assault.
1
9
305
Janet Inglis retweeted
Replying to @ActiveLesbians
Funny how suddenly inclusion isn’t necessary, isn’t it? It’s the same with Rugby. A real mystery…
2
23
432
3,553
Janet Inglis retweeted
Not seeing any “trans men” on the Aussie World Cup soccer team, are we? Wonder why that is.
14
28
348
4,143
Janet Inglis retweeted
Replying to @ThatAussieWoman
There is one single thing everyone needs to realise about Genspect (and Sex Matters and every single 'GC' enterprise), and it's the core law: no business in history has ever worked on putting itself out of business.
2
11
140
Janet Inglis retweeted
Nothing screams male pattern behaviour like dropping the shoulder. We have a similar bloke at our local surf club. We walk our dogs past on weekends. He tries to get your attention by batting his eyes & swishing his hair. My husband sneered at him so he shoulder charged my husband as he stood in a queue waiting for a coffee. Vile every one of them.
2
2
9
121
Janet Inglis retweeted
Always makes me chuckle when so called punks and anarchists simp for the neo-liberal establishment’s favourite cause - transgenderism, and use it as an excuse to demean women. It’s boring and conformist. TERFs are the new punks.
Replying to @aniobrien
I wouldn't typically be this much of an asshole, but im borrowing your energy here... That's a bit rich Ani. You even had weight affirming surgery to radically transform yourself. Who are you to judge others appearance?
1
4
53
1,538
Janet Inglis retweeted
If your first response to violence against girls is to bemoan that it “helps the far right narrative”, you are in a cult.
84
1,740
13,810
112,063
Janet Inglis retweeted
They always look so MISERABLE.
A confused woman talking 'healthy masculinity' while on testosterone is chemical cosplay.. She's pretending to be something she's not...and the strain is written all over her sad, haunted face.. This is trans joy..
2
11
57
699
Janet Inglis retweeted
Given that third wave "feminism" began in the early 1990's, I'm curious how those same women were promoting pornography in the 1960's. A time machine, perhaps?
3
22
108
2,264
Janet Inglis retweeted
Just like male cyclist Killips aggressively shoving female cyclist Arensman. These men truly hate women. 👇 x.com/i_heart__bikes/status/…

A man pretending to be a woman, suspected of murdering a little boy, publicly assaulted female journalists. Naturally Australian media referred to him as "she".
3
36
270
3,067
This and freedom of speech
Well done @salltweets “You are a hero around the world” When bad actors like the Sex Discrimination Commission and AHPRA are proving the institutions are captured by ideology and not reality, we need more than the Courts We need a Referendum on defining biological sex as at birth, so the protections exist in perpetuity in the Constitution
1
6
142
Janet Inglis retweeted
Go Sall, Australia is behind you. 💜🤍💚
Giggle has applied to have Giggle v Tickle heard in the High Court. “We have filed for special leave in the High Court… Because the federal court is saying men can be women in law & making women only spaces effectively unisex, we are going to the High Court to challenge that.”
2
9
79
1,029
Janet Inglis retweeted
Here is my Trick See. I will sexually a female opponent to win the match. See my trick!
15
345