Maoizm, Marksizm-Leninizm'in üçüncü ve daha yüksek aşaması mıdır?
Mao'nun teoriye ve pratik mücadeleye özgün katkıları, bunların olumlu ve olumsuz yönleri nelerdir?
Muhsin Yorulmaz @TheLeverOrg için yazdı, Barış Koca Türkçeye çevirdi.
👇🏾
abstraktdergi.net/maoizm-ner…
On this International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, and Transphobia, we at The Lever want to again state out absolute solidarity with all LGBTQI people who struggle daily against bigotry and oppression.
As Marxists, we understand that the class struggle is never simply that between bourgeois and proletarians. It is shot through with the struggle against these oppressions. Our liberation can only be realised together
“We invite all revolutionary and socialist minded people interested in this struggle to get in touch with us on a comradely and critical basis, so that we may unite in struggle and struggle in unity.”
Pandemic or no pandemic, we must and will continue the struggle to “bring to birth a new world from the ashes of the old” – a world in which “the international working class shall be the human race.”
struggleforanewworld.org/202…
An extremely important intervention by @alpaltinors for the Turkish Marxist magazine Abstrakt has been translated into English. Alp challenges a common misconception that Stalin was opposed to the successful completion of Mao's military campaign against the Guomindang fascists.
Diverse tendencies often raise as one of Stalin’s sins his supposed opposition to the Chinese revolution. But what did Stalin have to say during those crucial days in 1949? Based on the Mao-Stalin telegrammes, @alpaltinors sheds light on the matter.
abstraktdergi.net/did-stalin…
A correct understanding of our history as socialists is extremely important for how both correct and incorrect ideas about the past inform theoretical and practical prescriptions today.
We encourage all of our readers to peruse the entire piece for both evidence and commentary, but the relevant response to the debate around Mao and Stalin's positions in 1949 is to be found in these concluding paragraphs:
'Building a strong revolutionary movement makes positive reforms more possible because the ruling class will try harder to placate the organised masses. Revolutionaries are better reformists than the reformists themselves...
We must take the energy and enthusiasm of the Corbyn moment and bring it forward into new and higher forms of organising instead of allowing it to dissipate into apathy or ossify in unreformable Labour structures.'
dangerous conditions for example). Such a movement has to then cut adrift the lingering hope of an entrenched socialist Labour Party and its trade unions with their reactionary betrayal of internationalism and class struggle ecology.