Why is it that so many westerners don't understand they don't have ethical rights to pirating manga/anime/games?

Stay tuned @Redot_Engine I'm making a pretty exciting engine in Redot that I think will be really cool :D Hopefully I can finish a prototype within a month or so :) #Redot

I will never understand "grown male adults" when someone disagrees with them, they not only block you, but out of pettyness, reply to you, mock you, AND THEN blocks you so you can't defend yourself. @JTAlexander well played mister.

I wonder if it's just a coincident that Europe is getting hit by a heatwave and that it's allegedly from global warming... or if there's some other unknown factor at play

So many people in comments just parroting and lacking critical thinking. "I think we hate Graphql because it only uses POST" no. "Because graphql looks like a protocol that fontend devs made without thinking about backend" no. "it's like the not made here syndrome" no. "Unsurprisingly the same subset of people that never actually build sh*t anyways" no. "you did not get the choice to "mold" anything" no. Someone said vast majority of software developer are people who didn't learn, didn't study, don't think, they only parrot what they've been told, without forming their own understanding on the technology. Then once new technology appears, they parrot over to the next. Their behavior are like fictional lemmings. No wonder AI is replacing most of them. The answer why we hate GraphQL is because it is an incredibly SLOW, incredibly painful and incredibly complicated protocol that was designed to solve an EVEN MORE slower, more painful and more complicated problem. GraphQL is a necessary evil for certain apps due to their complexity. 99% of developers DO NOT HAVE THOSE REQUIREMENTS. But the enlightened programmers are being forced to use this overrated crap on simple apps/backend by lemming programmers. And we hate it because it vastly complicates the ENTIRE codebase *for no good reason* except because "a lemming programmer parrot said so." If you're a lemming parrot, you should not be allowed to make architectural decisions.

I'm glad I could take one for the team with @nbcsnl on summer break Thanks for the memes, internet! Hope you'll stick around for the reporting 🙇‍♀️

ARG @npmjs stop constantly expiring my API keys, you are making it so frustrating to be a package developer.

The first time I've ever seen this meme format used correctly. Props to OP for daring to question the elephant in the room.

Wow this is wild. Let me explain An assert is a check in the code that says: “This must always be true.” - In debug mode it will throw an error - In production mode it will not and other code will be optimized based on the assertion For example, if we assert array length >= 1 we don't need to check that array[0] exists and compiler will remove that This caused bugs in bun because sometimes the assertions were wrong. So bun had 2 choices 1. Fix the assertions 2. Hack the compiler into not trusting the assertions They chose option 2🤯 Given the success of bun I refuse to call this a mistake. But it is certainly a high degree of shipping fast and breaking things

"Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent"

there's always alternative OTP solutions that are simpler 🤣

So, Chrome's "web standard" Prompt API: Mozilla: Opposed WebKit: Opposed Microsoft: Several concerns W3C TAG: Several concerns Developers: Mostly negative Chrome: Ships anyway. A sad time for web standards. But, I guess someone at Google will get promoted, so 'every cloud…'

What an absolute dumb thing, what does this even mean?

This guy is getting flacked so hard in the comments rofl

Here’s the short-short version of why ChatGPT is unable to say my name (“Bryan Lunduke”) and errors out when it tries: Some time back, people began to notice that ChatGPT was hallucinating fact about me. Wild, ridiculous things. Like “Lunduke organizes Trans pride rallies”, “Lunduke has a husband”, and “Lunduke has two club feet”. Stuff that wasn’t even really based on sources or real training material. Just ChatGPT having an acid trip. These statements were easily considered “libelous”. And, based on the law at the moment, OpenAI would be liable for any potential damages should I take them to court. So I reached out to OpenAI (including CEO @sama) and, after having multiple discussions, I gave them a simple ultimatum: “Either fix ChatGPT so that it no longer consistently makes up false, defamatory statements about me… or make it so that ChatGPT can no longer talk about me.” After a month of working on it… OpenAI decided that they could not figure out how to get ChatGPT to stop consistently hallucinating about me. Think about that for a second. The engineers at OpenAI could not figure out how to make their AI system… tell the truth. So my name, “Bryan Lunduke”, joins a small handful of other names which ChatGPT chokes on. Interestingly… the “Don’t talk about this person” filter that OpenAI developed is incredibly buggy. Resulting in people finding creative ways to “trick” ChatGPT into talking about me. OpenAI couldn’t develop a system that told the truth… so they put on a broken, buggy filter. I find it all highly ridiculous.

海賊版問題は「海賊版は悪」という前提でないと対策も改善も出来ない。 この共通認識を前提に「海賊版を減らすには？」「現地の流通の問題は？」「価格とコストは？」等の具体的な対策の話が出来る。 擁護派の「海賊版は権利」が通ると、話はそこで終わってしまうのよ。 そして最後はコンテンツが死ぬ

Nice "glassy effect" popup @CircleCI Maybe next time use contrast-color() for your text or just... don't use fancy background effects ;)

The discussion around piracy between USA<->Japan has been so dumb. Pretty much boils down to the japanese thinking piracy is always 100% wrong and westerners think it's always 100% right. Japanese are like... maybe 10% wrong here but the westerners are like 90% wrong.

AAaaaaaa my feed is full of Japanese<->Americans debate posts about online piracy because I keep having to reply to some of the stupidest takes 😭😭 The amount of whataboutism from vast majority is HUGE. People comparing less than 5 year old game from a company alive and kicking with the burning of the Library of Alexandria?????? Maybe at least wait until the people (and/or thing) in question dies before you start digging their grave and throwing them in it? Pretty sure burying people alive is against the law or something.

敵対があるとしたら、所謂「実写化」をするテレビ局や映画プロジェクトと、かなあ。 本当に文字通りに作品を殺してしまったと言って過言でない事態が悲しいことに存在する。一部、成功した実写化もあるけれど。 実写化と原作側の戦いは、西側での企業ヘイトと少し似ているかも。

西洋の交流文化でどうしても我慢ならない事が一つだけある。 何でいちいち他の作品と比較したがるの？？？