When you've done right by them their entire lives, you'll find the perfect ending. Don't be too sad; you did your job. In light of The Inevitable, and the multitude of ways it can arrive, this was a success story.

I will never stop banging the drum that AI plagiarizes by default. You can literally never be sure it isn't ripping something else off when you generate an image, asset, or video. This is from Zelda if you didn't know.

The world is healing.

Don't let Stargate die, #SaveStargate

Fuck off @Microsoft @Windows I thought I made it clear I wanted copilot disabled when I went and DISABLED IT

3 days. I spent 3 days following AI troubleshooting. We are not there yet.

Saying that players who don't like certain movement mechanics in Battlefield because they're just "bad at the game" is a non-sequitur. I agree, the movement isn't difficult, and killing players slide-jumping isn't either. That's not the issue. The real problem is this. - It changes the pace of combat and alters the feeling of gunfights to where they become less readable, and more annoying to play fundamentally; and more importantly: - It shifts the tone of Battlefield from the "grounded in authenticity" mantra Battlefield had, which players have come to expect from it in the market, to something much arcadier I'm happy to support more movement options as long as they fit an authenticity and believability line, but it seems even asking THAT is too much for some reason. We praise vehicle design when they move naturalistically, why is infantry combat an exception? The heart of the argument here is about Battlefield's tone, which affects how the gameplay is designed, not because some players can't "get good". You don't get players complaining about emergent movement mechanics in Rocket League, even from trash cans, because they expect it from the game's tone, Battlefield players do not. And no, citing bugs like BF3's aim stabilization jump, BF4's various movement exploits, etc. as prooftexts to justify any and all future crackhead movement mechanics in Battlefield, doesn't work either. Should we also then bring back Battlepacks just because they were in BF4 too? I get there are those of you that don't care about Battlefield's tone, therefore there is no "movement line" to cross, but you're ignoring massive swaths of players that DO care and will just straight up not play the game as a result, as you often recommend them to do. A vast amount of players come to Battlefield to play a combined arms military shooter with the "appearance of realism without being a simulator" gameplay loop that Battlefield UNIQUELY offered as a middle ground in the market, but EA and DICE have abandoned that middle ground to trend chase other games. This is why it's annoying and there's so much complaining about things like movement and skins. You can continue to attack the caricature of a 0.5 KD player crouch walking to bolster your position, but you still can't define a well-reasoned upper limit for movement mechanics because you DON'T have a standard. An appeal to the skill gap is not a standard, and it does not define an upper limit for movement whatsoever. What then would be keeping DICE from adding wall running, double jumps, or even phasing through walls if it can be argued those could potentially take a vague amount of skill to perform? The bounds are defined by Battlefield's supposed authentic tone, which has been erased in favoring of emulating other games. If you just enjoy Battlefield's metamorphosis into a movement slop shooter like every other FPS out there, that's fine. We can disagree. Just don't expect the franchise to be anything more than a cheap, more plasticky Call of Duty substitute going forward.

Twitter has removed the media tab for user profiles in the latest app update, replacing it with "videos". They really want to drive this platform into the ground, don't they?

We're one AI boom away from having an entire industry of people who can build anything and explain nothing that should terrify more people than it does.

SteamOS just quietly turned into a nightmare for Windows handhelds. Valve added: • ASUS ROG Ally support • Lenovo Legion Go support • MSI Claw support • OneXPlayer support • VRR HDR • TDP controls • BIOS firmware updates • Wayland by default • Linux kernel 6.16 • lower controller latency • better GPU memory management And buried in the changelog: “Initial support for upcoming Steam Machine hardware.” This is no longer “Steam Deck software.” Valve is building a universal gaming OS for handheld PCs.

>Fuck this person >Fuck those people >X people should hang >Y's should die in a fire >I am on the side of understanding and acceptance Sigh.

Ok. @Microsoft @Windows you seriously need to FUCK OFF with these fullscreen ads on my PC. Nothing makes me NOT want to upgrade more than you trying to push this fucking "upgrade". You singlehandedly make me want to switch to Linux. Previously, we've just skipped every second Windows, because like that meme, every second iteration is terrible. Maybe next time, I'll just go elsewhere.

If you have kids, get them to exercise their brains in the way you did as a child. Don't let them fall into the idiocy generation.

Source: Nathan Buttigiegg on TikTok - the levies another charges ...tax upon tax upon tax and the politicians remain silent while Australia's debt rises. Not smart. Not smart at all.

Look who is starting to wake up.. Not in my life I would’ve thought haha Why aren’t more people speaking up? You’re complicit if you don’t

$AMD to the moon.

2026, 24 Apr- Stopped at the skate park for lunch. Oh my god, this schnitzel burger was amazing.

⏳

Unironically, BF1 was my least played and least enjoyed bf since the beginning of frostbite, excluding BF6. It's just so clunky, consolized, they were tempted to remove weapon attachments, and most maps end up being a spawn camp, even on conquest - how is that possible?

I would rather they just show an overhead shot of the stadium than highlights from a previous game. @afl @Channel7