Joined July 2013
828 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
The GLAZERS and MANCHESTER UNITED…17 threads. An interpretation of events covering: - £1.4 billion transfer spend - tax avoidance (not illegal) - "disintegration of Old Trafford" - the 2013 squad - 2nd biggest debt in Europe - sale of 52m shares for $814m - exec pay; and more👇
40
512
870
Not a fan of this bollox, even in the best of times, but especially whilst we’re still recovering from a disastrous decade.
▶️ 'All or Nothing: Manchester United', coming to Amazon Prime Video in 2027.
4
1
17
2,024
Toe In The Water retweeted
Clearly, this is not the first time he's done this 😅

552
3,478
26,297
983,012
Toe In The Water retweeted
This part of the agreement operates slightly strangely. So I wanna clear it up a bit. That way, everyone is working on the same page. To do so, let's look at the exact contract language, and simply call the parties "INEOS" and the "Bastards" (the glazers). I am also going to remove some parentheticals, to make it easy for everyone to read. Otherwise, there will be no changes from me. The goal is that you can read the contract without a layer of legalese, and form your own opinions. If it's in italics, it's from the contract. If not, it's from me. "Prior to making, or agreeing to make any Transfer of Class B Ordinary Shares (or marketing such Transfer), the Bastards must provide a written notice to INEOS, which shall state the specified number of Class B Ordinary Shares proposed to be Transferred" Follow? If the Bastards wanna sell, or even market a sale, they gotta tell INEOS how many shares they wish sell. Next: "INEOS shall have the right to provide the Bastards with written notice that it (a) wishes to acquire all (but not some only) of the Offered Shares at a price per share specified by INEOS or (b) does not wish to acquire the Offered Shares" So, after the Bastards say "we wanna sell," INEOS gets to provide them with the first offer; or say that they don't want to buy. It's their choice. The Cunts state the amount of shares to be sold; but INEOS states the price. "The Bastards shall provide INEOS with written notice that it (a) agrees to the terms or (b) rejects the terms." Easy enough. If the parties agree on terms, they enter into a contract, and INEOS gets the shares. But, if the parties don't agree on terms: "the Bastards may sell the Offered Shares to a purchaser at a per share price not less than the price offered by INEOS" So, the price that INEOS offered earlier, becomes the floor. The Bastards can't accept an offer which is below that.
6
7
48
18,116
Toe In The Water retweeted
Man dodges arrows in shootout between tribes, Papua New Guinea 2025
1,823
3,937
51,220
17,258,919
Toe In The Water retweeted
Replying to @barneyrednews
Or 449 Reds and a Barnsley fan like me. If a Yorkshireman is prepared to spend money subscribing it must be good 😀
2
3
2,374
Toe In The Water retweeted
Stop looking for Burnhamism - in six years, I’ve never found. Watching the mayor up close in Manchester, I’ve seen his unusual gifts and glaring weaknesses. Would he make a good prime minister? Our weekend read - by @joshi manchestermill.co.uk/stop-lo…
18
124
381
349,595
Toe In The Water retweeted
Manchester(ism) Our data driven report showed how Manchester Council entered a partnership w/ Abu Dhabi enabled public land income to be off-shored at great reputational cost See here sheffield.ac.uk/media/34821/…
Manchester(ism) Our data driven report outlines any productivity gains are taken up by surging rents, while developers extract these rents out the city and neighbourhoods experience gentrification. But control of buses is certainly a good idea! See here sheffield.ac.uk/media/87471/…
12
18
2,535
Toe In The Water retweeted
Replying to @liamgallagher
1
10
158
12,784
Toe In The Water retweeted
"Your tickets are secure, are you f**king sure" ​Despite Manchester United’s assurances that digital NFC tickets are fully secure, a major flaw in the @SeatGeek ticketing platform leaves supporters highly vulnerable to unauthorised access. By knowing a fan's Supporter ID and just their surname or postcode, anyone can unauthorisedly view, download, and use their tickets without the owners knowledge. This has already resulted in legitimate ticket holders being turned away at both home and away matches because their tickets had already been scanned. ​The issue was deliberately kept quiet during the season to minimise disruption, but with the Premier League aiming for fully digital tickets next season, it must be prioritised over the summer. The risk is exacerbated by a club culture where fans have widely shared their Supporter IDs for ticket-forwarding purposes, and instances where Manchester United emails have inadvertently exposed this information. The author urges @SeatGeek and the club to implement a secure, user-led authorizlsation process rather than relying on flawed off-the-shelf solutions. ​To read more click here: open.substack.com/pub/cheese… Please repost, this is important for all clubs now digital ticket is the future, not just #MUFC

16
135
226
183,873
Toe In The Water retweeted
Manchester City, the BBC says, haven't yet sold their 6,000 home allocation of tickets for tonight's FA Youth Cup final against United. United. City said the final had to be switched to their titchy 7,000-seat training ground because main stadium has construction work - yeah!
121
165
1,591
145,384
Toe In The Water retweeted
Strap in: Follow one of our paratroopers from @16AirAssltBCT jumping in to Tristan da Cunha – one of the world’s most remote communities – to deliver vital medical support 🪂
290
1,128
8,583
770,230
Fergie being booed at the Etihad today. So many childhoods ruined. It's a beautiful thing
16
32
580
14,717
Truths
Mar 26
I hate Man Utd as much as anyone but I can't believe people are questioning why Tonali would want to go there, a miles bigger club than us, CL football, building a class team slowly but surely and bigger wages, let's not be stupid now
4
1,478
Toe In The Water retweeted
🗣️Old Trafford: Stolen in Plain Sight Supporters asked to engage with a process that offered limited transparency and no meaningful opportunity to scrutinise key assumptions, financial models, or long term impacts. Engagement through pre selected forums without genuine challenge risked exactly what it became, a rubber stamping exercise rather than an open consultation. The club in full PR mode wheeling out all the bollocks when we all know this is nothing more than sacrificing our home at the altar of greed. Old Trafford is all we have left our history, our home, our identity and now even that is being chipped away, piece by piece. The Americanisation of the game, the dilution of fan culture, the pricing out of generational supporters. It’s not just change, it’s loss. The 1958 🇾🇪
41
150
562
39,727
Toe In The Water retweeted
Sit down and remember United in Roterdam 1991.
10
14
217
35,835
The more ridiculous the costs get, the higher the pressure to get greedy investors on board to finance it. The more the pressure for hospitality and premium seating to provide a return. The more Utd moves away from its core mission as a social institution. The less the point
EXCLUSIVE: Delays building Man Utd stadium to push costs past £3BN after stumbling block thesun.co.uk/sport/38484602/…
5
19
66
11,468
AVRAM GLAZER became chairman of Innovate Corp two years ago. Yesterday's results show shares are sinking like a stone👇. He sold $95m of United shares in early 2021 to help him build a 29% stake in Innovate on which he has made huge paper losses. 🙄👉🗑️ uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/pas…

19
106
175
Glazer's Innovate: 1Q 2025: "as of the date of these financial statements, there is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern." Revenue down. Losses up. Not generating cash. $672m of debt to either refinance or pay-off within 18 months ⏰
6
15
34
7,500
Toe In The Water retweeted
Some heroes wear capes — Chief Aaron Edwards wears blue.
2,830
11,236
104,492
26,737,974
Utd say 5% increase. They've already engineered a 40% hike in matchday revenue this season by denying tickets to ordinary fans👇 And 600 more seats in SBC being sacrificed for hospitality x.com/ToeInTheWater1/status/…

Replying to @ToeInTheWater1
Extra £2m match day revenue per game 😯
7
13
2,335
Toe In The Water retweeted
Dear Andy, your support and dedication blah blah blah, but after 40 odd years of the same seat we're fucking you off because we can make more money from the tourists.. Thank you for your continued support.
6
14
123
37,994