Q: Why do you only hold Kaspa?
A: Because Kaspa is the only crypto worth holding.
Q: But considering the nature of crypto and how it's volatile, isn't diversification a good option?
A: Then I'll hold other hard assets like gold or silver. Why would I touch anything that doesn't fit the definition of cryptocurrency at its core? Why would I touch anything that cannot follow the laws of monetary physics? Why would I touch anything that can be captured by the Cantillon Effect? Why would I invest in a wanna-be crypto "company"? Just why? Crypto is supposed to be an immutable, permissionless, decentralized-and now programmable- ledger that just so happens to follow the laws of physics, and in doing so creates the perfect environment for a greed proof version of money to exist outside of dogmatic law. Anything with a company behind it, or a board, or anything proof of stake is disqualified by these standards.
#KASPA is the only option for the future if humanity is to escape the current system we have. Why would I cast my vote other places and give them power simply because "money"?
Shall I go on or, are you understanding that I'm thinking humanity's financial future, and if Kaspa fails,
#crypto failed.
#StudyKAS