Would you buy a hardware wallet that operates completely offline?
No apps. No phones. No internet required. Just tap2pay—like contactless cards but with full crypto verification happening locally, executed with zero-knowledge proofs on-device to ensure every transaction is private and secure.
If you would, think of other Web3 natives that will. Now double down and think of potential users in countries like the UK with increasing privacy concerns.
This is why I believe
#M0n3y is so attractive, especially at these levels.
It’s real tech, solving real issues in the real world while aligning with the web3. Cypherpunk culture
A couple days ago,
@dev_skill_issue posted version 0.1 of the hard wallet design and the market seems to be excited about that (price action has been heated and strong since then).
This trajectory not only puts
@mnplyM0N3Y in the same market as Tangem, SafePal, Trezor, and the others but also allows
#M0n3y to compete significantly with native privacy giants like Monero.
Monero, Zcash, etc., only offer a fraction of what
@mnplyM0N3Y is building and so is more likely to eat into the market share, especially when mainnet is live.
For context, a measly 5% market share of
$XMR will put
#M0n3y at $285m mcap (75x from here).
But where will all that demand come from? Like I said earlier,
@mnplyM0N3Y is solving real privacy concerns; such solutions are in high demand in countries like the UK, China, North Korea, etc.
I believe adoption will only trend forward and upwards from launch.
And this is significant for the price action because
#m0n3y has been designed to get increasingly scarce as adoption rises.
Every minted pUSD (the privacy-preserving stablecoin) locks up more M0N3Y, creating artificial scarcity, and minting pUSD burns 0.01% of M0N3Y per transaction, so adoption directly reduces supply.
You can front-run all this growth at below $4m mcap before mainnet.
Or you can miss another 100x play; your call.
This reprices higher, slowly, then all at once.
ANNTWQsQ9J3PeM6dXLjdzwYcSzr51RREWQnjuuCEpump