Joined February 2022
- Tweets 5,062
- Following 2,349
- Followers 1,683
- Likes 96,098
708 Photos and videos
11h
Sell in May and go away? How about take a tax loss and then dca back in because fukem that’s why.
43
Jun 13
I wonder how much of the ai capital at some point said about bitcoin “the government will just shut it down”.
1
21
Mark retweeted
Jun 13
Since 2023 Anthropic's been dooming how AI will take your job, truck, girl and then kill you so government needs to control it.
FAFO
12
23
215
13,501
Jun 13
Bitcoiners mad that Saylor thinks Bitcoin is money and digital capital but totally ok with blockchain becoming money data storage.
3
29
Mark retweeted
Jun 12
HISTORIC stuff from Metaplanet.
They bought the toll booth between Japan’s $7.4 trillion mattress-cash retirement dragon and Bitcoin yield products.
This is where the “it’s just a treasury company” crowd gets processed into soup.
Acquire BTC, acquire rails, package yield.
Distribute into the world’s most yield-starved capital base.
People are still analyzing Metaplanet like it’s a guy with a Coinbase account, while Simon is quietly building the Bitcoin Mitsubishi UFJ Death Star with orange lights and shareholder accretion.
The bear case is now:
“Okay yes, they own 40,177 BTC, are building a Bitcoin securities platform, and are aiming directly at trillions in inert Japanese savings… but have you considered I am emotionally uncomfortable?”
This company is currently valued at less than their Bitcoin holdings.
Total insanity.
It won’t last.
18
22
449
19,154
Mark retweeted
Jun 11
The Strategy/MSTR/STRC bears have had their brains officially cooked.
They are either bad actors or extremely stupid.
There isn't a third option.
Strategy has 845,256 Bitcoin valued at $52.4 billion.
They owe $142 million per month in dividends.
Now let's scale the balance sheet down 1,000,000x to show you how stupid these people are.
$52,400 of Bitcoin
$142/month dividend bill
0.845256 BTC
That means the monthly dividend bill is:
$142 ÷ $52,400 = 0.271% per month
Annualized:
$1,704/year ÷ $52,400 = 3.25% per year
So the bear argument becomes:
“This person owns $52,400 of Bitcoin and owes $142 per month. They are doomed.”
That is hilarious.
63
68
836
56,628
Mark retweeted
Jun 10
Look, this isn’t some FUD to scare people. It’s a massive, looming wall we’re about to hit.
The blockchain size is creeping up on 1 TB, and the UTXO set could easily blow past the 16 GB RAM limit. If this data just keeps bloating and hits 100 GB, running a full node will become impossible for regular people. Everything will get pushed to cloud servers and enterprise-grade hardware, and just like that, Bitcoin’s decentralization is dead.
Also, we need to stop looking at $100K as the endgame for Bitcoin. If that's the ceiling, it dies. Bitcoin is binary: it either goes to zero, or it hits $10 million. And under that kind of terminal thesis, there’s only one choice—Bitcoin has to stay absolutely pure. It must be a pure, cross-border clearing layer for institutional-scale capital.
Leave the jpeg storage and token minting to Layer 2s or other chains. They’ll always be better at that stuff anyway. But the ultimate clearing layer? That belongs to Bitcoin, and Bitcoin alone.
Jun 9
Nonsensical FUD. Running a node will only get cheaper moving forward and you can still run a kick ass node on a cheap 6 year old MacBook Air. If I wanted to attack Bitcoin, I’d make up retarded FUD like this to try and scare people into changing its consensus rules.
12
18
75
3,152
Mark retweeted
BIP110 has enough support to not cause a split @MrHodl
Is there a risk anyway? Sure. BIP148 supporters accepted the exact same risk.
You are clutching at straws trying to come up with a rationalization for why BIP148 was OK and BIP110 isn't.
They're both minority softforks and neither of them had consensus.
It you want justification where one is NOT REQUIRED for the risk you're pretending only applies to BIP110 then Core 30 is that justification.
But the reality is that it does not even need a justification because it is already just by virtue of making Bitcoin self evidently better and the critiques against it all being lazy smears rather than substantive arguments.
14
49
241
6,623
Mark retweeted
Jun 4
Cancer
Week 1 of the 10M CTR distribution has started 🍊🍋
10 million CTR will be distributed weekly to stakers during the first 3 months of the CTR launch.
CTR stakers govern the Bitcoin economy.
14
44
331
10,045
Jun 5
We should do this all summer. Just bounce along very very close to 58k but never quite getting there.
13
Mark retweeted
There’s no escape from this meme if you understand money even slightly
9
10
63
1,464
Mark retweeted
Jun 2
This is censorship.
Not wanting jpegs on Bitcoin is not censorship.
Because if they actually believe their side is correct (and have a eureka moment where they realize that ignoring soft forks doesn't prevent them occurring) then they should come to the table and offer their understanding.
As it stands:
- bitcointalk(.)org is a ghost town
- github posts get marked as spam and insta-nuked
- reddit went from not permitting posts about knots/110 to straight up banning accounts that even hint at it
- "delving bitcoin" deleted the entire thread where @dathon_ohm had some the most involved back n' forth with multiple Core devs since the topic came up
- the mailing list saw nothing by way of push back on the original proposal, and isn't something anyone should ever use (requires asking bryan bishop's approval which is unacceptable given what was revealed about him in the epstein email - not to mention it's just another Core echo chamber so it can end up being a waste of time trying to get anything approved there)
- the 'BIP' repo itself where I will admit @muchandamus did allow conversation to happen and ultimately merge the BIP
Given all that, Murch was the person from the other side who I figured could be the best to speak out against BIP-110, and I commended him on his professionalism re the BIP itself. However after taking some rather cheap shots here and blocking me I presume the agreed upon strategy - again - is ignoring the fork and hoping it goes away having given up on any attempt to formally discredit it.
6
19
207
4,194
Mark retweeted
May 30
I support BIP-110
Because Bitcoin is money
The mission is to separate state and money
Not to be data storage to enrich grifters
62
166
803
26,455
Mark retweeted
May 28
What people think eggs do:
- Cause heart disease
- Clog your arteries
- Raise your "bad" cholesterol
- Kill you after three a week
- Need the yolk binned
- Demand a low-fat alternative
- Represent dietary recklessness
- A guilty little pleasure
What eggs actually do:
- Contain every nutrient required to build an entire living animal from scratch
- Deliver the most bioavailable protein on the planet
- Provide the choline your brain and liver are crying out for
- Carry vitamins A, D, E, K, B12, and folate in the yolk you were told to throw away
- Arrive in their own biodegradable packaging
- Require zero ingredients, zero processing, zero label
- Cost about 25p each
- Vanish from the guidelines whenever the egg lobby stops funding the study
The most complete food in nature spent fifty years on the most-wanted list for a crime the seed oils committed.
Charges quietly dropped. No apology issued. Have the eggs.
92
1,016
3,355
39,840
Mark retweeted
Woke up. Drank some coffee. Opened X. Bear Porn flooding my timeline (pertaining to BTC).
In the near term we could have:
Clarity Act passing
Change to Basel Framework
US Bitcoin Strategic Reserve
In less than 2 years we have the next halving.
Warsh is now the Fed Chair
Owns a stake in Flashnet ( flashnet.xyz/ )
Has stated if you’re under 40 Bitcoin is your new gold.
$MSTR & $ASST have perpetual bids on Bitcoin through their prefs and common stock issuance.
Not to mention the US national debt just passed 39 trillion dollars.
Bitcoin hasn’t lost the plot, you just have the attention span of a gnat.
I have never been more bullish about where Bitcoin is headed and the amount of Bear posts I’m seeing is only adding fuel to my bullishness.
Top of the morning my fellow bulls🤝
7
1
41
2,264
Mark retweeted
May 19
Trump de-escalates every time the 10y yield gets to 4.5%.
Bonds don't want war, but Israel does. The coming years are a battle between the two over US foreign policy.
Either the US stops being Israel's mercenary army or the bond market implodes.
20
104
922
25,911
Mark retweeted
May 18
🌮 CORRECTION
President Trump says he has called off a US "Military attack" on Iran which was scheduled for tomorrow after the BOND MARKET called him and asked him to "hold off." 😂
BREAKING: President Trump says he has called off a US "Military attack" on Iran which was scheduled for tomorrow after leaders of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE called him and asked him to "hold off."
Trump has instructed the US Military to "be prepared to go forward with a full, large scale assault of Iran."
49
103
692
54,909