A bit odd, don’t you think? As soon as Muslims started immigrating to Japan, its Shinto shrines and Buddhist temples started burning down, just like the churches in Europe.

According to the UK government, you’re considered a terrorist if you believe that Western culture is under threat from mass migration. Yes, this is really on their website.

Interesting and tragic if true.

In the USA:

When your government tells you; "we're all in the same boat!"

Iconic Bristol shipyard REMOVES Great Britain from name to 'represent diversity' gbnews.com/news/bristol-ss-g…

If only such state force was directed against stabby illegal migrants…

After the horrific attempted beheading in Belfast, Labour’s answer is to amend the Online Safety Act and force social media platforms to remove content faster during “times of crisis”. Not fix the border. Not answer the public. Not restore trust. But instead censor the reaction. They do not want answers, they want total control.

British people on X keep telling us they cannot speak freely. That saying the truth about mass immigration and crime will get them arrested, fired, or labeled for life. That is exactly why Japanese accounts have to say it out loud. Your country is being fundamentally changed against the clear will of the native population. Your children are paying the highest price. Your police protect the perpetrators more than the victims. We in Japan see it clearly. And we are asking — how much more are you willing to lose before you decide that your children’s future matters more than being called names? The window is closing. Fast.

As a Japanese watching the UK right now, I have one simple question. A Sudanese asylum seeker just tried to behead a local man in Belfast. The victim lost an eye. This comes after years of grooming gangs raping thousands of British girls — gangs that police and councils deliberately ignored because they were afraid of being called racist. In Japan, even one case like this would have triggered national outrage and immediate policy reversal. But in Britain, the conversation is still about “not being far-right.” British people, at what point does protecting your own children become more important than protecting your reputation? We genuinely do not understand this.

‘What is a woman?’ can be rephrased as ‘What is it, that a man who “identifies” as a woman is identifying *as*?’ Either it’s an adult human female, in which case that’s what women are after all, or it’s a set of pernicious stereotypes, or it’s… something else. But what?

Only women can breastfeed. Saying so should not be controversial, and it should certainly not be treated as unlawful. Yet Jasmine Sussex has been dragged through years of legal proceedings for raising legitimate concerns about male “chestfeeding” and infant safety. Her case returns to QCAT today - and it's a chilling reminder of what happens when biological truth becomes punishable. 👉 Read more: womensforumaustralia.org/mal… #IStandWithJasmineSussex #Auspol

Canada is headed for another recession. Their open-borders PM blames migrant cuts. Effectively admitting Liberals were using mass migration to fake the GDP numbers. The "Biden Miracle" on steroids.

The Death of Satire

Yeah...

Why are Christian preachers arrested in the UK, but Islamic ones can do as they please? Why the double standard?

Do you want to know something interesting about the decision to remove Winston Churchill, Alan Turing and Jane Austen from bank notes? Savanta, a market research company, was chosen to run a focus group. The result of that focus group is that Churchill was “divisive”, Turing “an imperialist” and Austen “contentious and not representative”. Yet that focus group had only 119 people in it. And only one person called Turing “imperialist”. Someone who probably did not even know that he was not only instrumental in the Allies winning WW2 but was a gay man who was chemically castrated to “cure him”. Turing was left fat, flabby and so unhappy that he carefully injected cyanide into an apple and ate it. He was found with half the apple by his side. The Bank of England claims that the focus group was only part of its decision and it ran a broader public inquiry that favoured animals and flowers. Who did they ask? Primary school kids?