adult. multiship. character focused, not ship focused.

Joined March 2013
1,617 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
If you like my work, please consider checking out my Patreon! Patrons get access to comics before anyone else does. Sketch request livestreams, tapas thank yous, as well as potentially movie nights and random art tutorials. Bearlings&Bear Fighters also get personal monthly art!
4
1
11
5,119
we sure are here retweeted
28
1,399
13,333
90,406
we sure are here retweeted
seeing the recent bloodymary edits imagine if this is simon and grace before the drama
this is the most stupidest, high effort shitpost i've ever made. enjoy ryland grace being the captain of invincible ii #projecthailmary #inspacewithmarkiplier
4
435
4,704
44,490
we sure are here retweeted
I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this. The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home. There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered. What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business. Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not. This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy. That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids. What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes. Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming? No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.
My first instinct was to support the UK’s social media ban for under 16s. Protecting children from grooming, exploitation and harmful content seems like common sense. But I’m seeing a lot of opposition to it, so I’m genuinely curious as to why? One thing making me second guess is that platforms like bluesky are exempt, while at the same time there’s a push to let 16 year olds vote. To me that looks less like child protection and more like controlling where young people get their information. Interested to hear other perspectives.
154
5,364
20,972
824,801
I often think about the amount of amazing stories we'll never get to see/read/play because most people with money think they're smarter than creatives and ended up changing something remarkable into something you'll forget by tomorrow morning.
Curry Barker was offered $2 million to rewrite ‘OBSESSION’ and make Bear a hero. He turned it down and made his version of the film for $750,000. (Source: hollywoodreporter.com/movies…)
4
109
1,413
31,360
we sure are here retweeted
I wont have this next one done for a bit so enjoy this clip i finished of #bloodymary
62
1,248
8,990
219,927
we sure are here retweeted
Jun 14
trying to act all nonchalant then pulls out the exact number of days fake idgafer
"i love you" ★☆☆☆☆ “I lived 54,554 days before I met Louis de Pointe du Lac.” ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★ #tvlspoilers
13
2,991
24,352
274,085
we sure are here retweeted
I don't remember which of my friends said it but they've told me the moogle on the mogstation logo seems like it's spreading asscheeks and I could never unsee it 😭
135
2,504
13,469
699,132
we sure are here retweeted
This is going to end up being like the Speed Racer movie but for Zoomers. Bombed hard at the box office, 10-15 years later becomes a weird and fondly remembered cult classic
Fabulous Magic Powers. Masters of the Universe - now playing only in theaters. Get tickets now.
66
329
5,893
102,524
we sure are here retweeted
10/10 this was the closest thing I've seen to a Dino De Laurentiis movie in a long time. Dumb as shit in the most intelligent ways. A film that should not exist nor has a right to be so good.
39
59
741
18,941
we sure are here retweeted
C'MON JAMES GUNN THEY'RE RIGHT THERE
Nicholas Galitzine and Camila Mendes training for ‘MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE’ 📸
172
2,836
51,774
2,889,803
we sure are here retweeted
PLEASE STOP 🛑 ✋ Watch this edit of #MastersOfTheUniverse and tell me it doesn’t make you hyped!! The score is perfect 🤩
I Have the Power
5
26
143
2,698
we sure are here retweeted
#HEMAN x barbie girl
13
876
4,529
46,831
we sure are here retweeted
Someone should record MOTU onto a VHS. It would be so peak.
Masters of the Universe (2026) Art by @luisitocollagea
3
118
1,476
17,591
we sure are here retweeted
No, but my wife once said "Shadow Weaver is a sexy, gender-swapped evil Orko." Now I can't unsee it and I hate her for it. 😂
I don't know much about it, but I heard that Orko and Shadow Weaver are the same race. Is this true?
29
268
2,803
78,470
we sure are here retweeted
This sounds like an overambitious promise that will never come to life and result in a half-assed mechanic, meaning the remake is staying extremely faithful to the original in this aspect
Fable NPC system is so sophisticated the devs are calling it a "life simulator" You build reputation through your actions in the game, then each NPC has a different opinion of you based on your reputation. You might have to become a rich business owner to impress and date one of the NPCs in the game, but another NPC will hate you for being so rich. As a consequence, that NPC could increase the prices on their merchandise when you visit their store. Even small actions such as giving money to the homeless or evicting people out of their houses will impact your reputation, and this can be done at a very large scale, because you could: - Buy every home in the world of Fable - Evict everyone out of their homes - Have every NPC now live on the street Possibilities are quite literally endless here
269
2,283
38,966
1,001,141
fuck off
24
we sure are here retweeted
simu liu i apologize i was NOT familiar with your game
127
10,044
158,959
2,184,424
we sure are here retweeted
グレイスカル城が正義の味方なのに骸骨モチーフな理由、海外サイトによると「玩具デザイナーが主人公の城として販売されると知らなかったから」というあまりにもいい加減な理由だとか。実際コンセプトアートや箱絵では城の中にいるのは悪側で主人公は城攻めをしてる側だ #マスターズ・オブ・ユニバース
28
390
1,233
58,574
we sure are here retweeted
My wife is a huge MOTU fan and when i turn around to say to her "what a fucking great movie" she was crying of happiness, cos she had a rough childhood and watching He-Man used to make her happy when she was little. This movie make you feel you are 10 years old again.
I've seen a lot of people describe this movie as life-changing, or something to that effect. Yep. Little bit. 😊
16
207
1,969
31,227
we sure are here retweeted
Mondo 200x Masters of the Universe 1/12 Scale Teela Limited Edition, preorders open Tuesday (6/16) at noon EST ($125.00) - bit.ly/4eg4Cgu
13
69
627
30,873