"There will always be new ways we define ourselves."
We do stand at the edge of a pronounced crisis of identity, but, only in the fact that it will happen simultaneously for so many.
This has happened again and again in small ways to you, and to everyone ever.
In my philosophy undergrad, I was lucky enough to have a prof named Litke who is one of the rare few philosophers that actively had classes taught about his works while he was still alive (and oddly enough, one of the best garlic collectors/cultivators in the world)
But his passion was the philosophy of self.
And one thing he spoke about frequently was this concept of “the long body of self”
He gave the example, that when he was in highschool, he was a top swimmer, and expected to go a top college on a swimming scholarship and do a degree biology.
However, in his last year of high school, he was in a car accident that severely damaged his shoulder, and broke both his legs leaving him in a wheelchair for months, and never able to swim again at his top form.
He had always defined himself as “a swimmer” with that internalized language. His friends were his swimming friends. His girlfriend was a swimmer.
He could no longer swim. He no longer spent time with his swimming friends, and eventually they and his girlfriend drifted.
His identity came crashing down.
Until he built it up into something new.
It was around then he discovered his love of botany and of philosophy.
But to each of us, these identity arks happen many times in our lives.
How you defined yourself as a child or a teen likely doesn’t match how you’d define yourself now.
We build up a new version of self, only for it to come crashing down, and we eventually build back up a new identity. In this on-going loop-de-loop pattern.
The thing is, none of these were really our “self”
They are externalities we defined ourselves as, and the self is what you see if you were to turn that set of loops 90 degrees and look through the collective snapshot of life.
Each one taught us something, and led to the next one, but none are defining.
After all, did you call yourself a mathematician because there was no one better than you at math, or did you think you weren’t good at arithmetic because a calculator could add faster than you?
No of course not.
You being good at math, and you understanding math, has in fact not changed.
The productivity output of math in the world has changed - but you have not.
(Plus let’s remember, even if people can output the math they can’t apply it if they don’t understand it)
You as a person are more than any one part or talent, and this is also a talent you still retain and do uniquely well; and those who are both top brass at their talents and apply it with unique perspectives are more likely to be more productive with AI rather than replaced by it.
Because the one thing that any system will struggle with is the same thing we humans do: originality.
And you are good at originality, and at a thirst for pursuing it.
So in your life, in a thousand little ways, and in a handful of large ways, you will redefine yourself, but it is only the collection of those experiences that are “you” and that is always a unique and valuable thing.
And know that after each crash, no matter how bleak it can seem - we always do redefine ourselves and often it becomes so natural that we struggle to remember the ways we identified ourselves in the past.
There will always be human experiences to have.
There will always be new ways we define ourselves.
There will always be new places we fit in the world, no matter how out of place we feel.
And you will always be good at math.
🫡