Science funding relies on peer review, in which subject-matter experts evaluate whether a project merits grant support. If approvals move toward political or cabinet-level review, university discoveries would face non-scientific barriers before early biotech development. The nonpartisan risk is that research priorities would depend on politics rather than scientific merit.
In our recent episode of the Vital Health Podcast, host Duane Schulthess (
@DuaneSchulthess) speaks with Steve Potts (
@desertbiopharma), CEO and Co-Founder at Breakthru Medicine, about OMB’s May 29 proposed rule on federal grantmaking, science funding oversight, peer review, university licensing, biotech financing, and U.S. biopharma leadership.
Watch the full episode here:
youtu.be/OVNxLyz0OL8
The May 29 Office of Management and Budget sweeping regulatory change, which would shift grant funding decisions from scientists to politicians, is catastrophic for science, patients, and the biotech industry. Please read about what this proposal would do, and if you agree that it would forever tie political views to winning federal funding (and it will cut both ways), please sign this petition or others and speak out:
fight2win.standupforscience.…
#VitalHealthPodcast #ScienceFunding #PeerReview #HealthPolicy #Biopharma #Oncology