A message for all @UKLabour MPs who have signed #EDM240

Remember, every person who says they are disgusted by the Supreme Court judgment is admitting that: They’re disgusted that female sexual assault survivors might meet in a support group to open up about their trauma, without men being present. They’re disgusted that lesbians can socialise exclusively with other lesbians, without men being present. They’re disgusted by new mothers gathering together to discuss breastfeeding or post partum problems, without men being present. They’re disgusted that girls can play sport with other girls and shower, change and dress, without boys being present. They’re disgusted that organisations - which realise they are too male dominated - can’t fill any female quotas with other men. They’re disgusted that vulnerable female prisoners and arrestees can’t be searched by men or kept in a cell with other men. They’re disgusted that women can have their own things. They’re disgusted by the Equality Act 2010. They’re disgusted by the law. Isn’t that disgusting?

Employers should have withdrawn “inclusive” policies in Feb 2022 at the latest, when it was confirmed in @ForWomenScot’s 1st case that self ID isn’t the law It’s not rocket science. Men’s, women’s and a mixed sex space if practicable Maybe read this ⤵️ substack.com/@akuareindorfkc…

Now available: "To her the trade union movement was her life" a biography of Maty Quaile (1886-1958) Manchester Irishwoman and trade union organiser of women workers. Our thanks to Susan Fitzgerald from Unite for her support for the publication . lulu.com/shop/bernadette-hyl…

A lawyer who doesn’t understand that the Code reflects the law 🤦‍♀️

A Labour voter all my life (71 now) but I have never felt as ashamed of @UKLabour as I do now, watching MPs queue up to explain why they’re abandoning women, proving that they’re happy for my granddaughters to have fewer rights in future than I have had. Wretched cowards all.

“New rules” @EmilyThornberry? It’s statutory guidance. Surely you know the status of statutory guidance? Surely you understand it’s not law? And that if it’s blocked the law will simply remain the law? Incredible if not.

1. Scouts is not about who you shag 2. Not all gay men are fun camp zoo animals for straights 3. This is a kids organisation can we just bloody stop with this let the young gay lads maybe just be lads and forget the gay thing with their mates 4. Im so tired of this

This unqualified bore says his secondhand opinions are “not up for debate.” Yes they are. At a university all opinions are up for debate. If you cannot defend your opinions rationally, either they are indefensible or you are too stupid to defend them. In either case you have no right to force them on students who have expressed their wish to attend a lecture by doing so. thetimes.com/uk/education/ar…

Here are the utter bellends, doing their usual social justice warrior, Complex PTSD schtick, sent to me by a disgusted student who wanted to LISTEN TO @michaelpforan

Come on @parkrunUK you know this is silly now! There’s only one type of woman but there’s an infinite abundance of personalities! Time to start making sense & being fair to 51% of the population! #savewomenssports @mara_yamauchi @wsusportsunion @SportSEENuk @WomensRightsNet

Great start to the weekend, having fun & saying no to unfairness for females in Parkrun. Great course at Urmston mostly on grass, thank you to all the marshalls. Spoke to one woman who agreed that woman & girls care about our times. No males in a female category. #SaveWomensSport #FairnessforFemales #LoveParkrun #HateUnfairness @WomensRightsNet @Caterin00138072 @mara_yamauchi @HallisseyC @CarlBontoft

Women’s rights campaigners have accused Green MP Hannah Spencer of “wanting to take away women’s rights” after she attended a protest against new guidance on single sex spaces. Spencer joined a demonstration in Manchester city centre opposing the latest guidance from the EHRC

.@BellRibeiroAddy, please could you explain whether: - you consider the guidance to be unlawful, and if so how; or - you consider the law to be wrong, and if so how blocking the guidance will affect it and/or secure any other objective? Also >

Great reporting by Manchester Evening News. Hannah Spencer and the Green Party need to be clear what they mean when they are supporting trans liberation, it means no female only spaces, not for women who have been raped or suffered domestic violence, not for women in prison or those of us that want to go to the gym or to work and not have to change in front of a man. Poll after poll tells us this is not a niche view, this is what the public want, this is what women want. Single sex spaces, services and facilities where it matters for our privacy, dignity and safety. @WomensRightsNet

I've written the inaugural piece for my legal Substack on this week's attempt by MPs to block the @EHRC Code of Practice: EARLY WARNING | Are MPs plotting to overturn For Women Scotland and dismantle women’s and LGB people’s discrimination law rights? open.substack.com/pub/within…

Why are trade unions undermining women’s workplace rights? Unions spend more time defending ‘trans brothers and sisters’ than the interests of female members. spiked-online.com/2026/06/04…

The Scottish Court of Session has just ruled that providing multi-user unisex toilets in a primary school amounted to indirect sex discrimination against female pupils. scotcourts.gov.uk/media/mv5d…

This is a straightforward question, @stellacreasy. Might we have an answer?