Last weekend: 2 live events powered by our cashless payment system. 6,331 on-chain transactions 33 relayers 3,640 NFC cards Total fees: 1.40068 EGLD (~$5.3) 🤯 For both organizers and thousands of participants, everything was fully transparent and immutable on @MultiversX. No more: “my balance looks wrong” “I topped up 100 RON and it’s gone” “I only bought one drink, where’s my credit?” “money disappeared from my card” Every transaction = on-chain, traceable, untouchable. That’s what real-world blockchain looks like.

🚨BREAKING: The S&P 500 is officially going 24/7. S&P Dow Jones Indices licensed the index to Trade[xyz] for Hyperliquid perpetual futures contracts. The benchmark now trades 24/7 on-chain, with NO market closures for first time in the index's 69-year history.

🚨 THE SPEECH THAT CHANGED CRYPTO SEC Chair Atkins introducing token taxonomy. Clarity is here 🔥

THEY DID IT. The SEC and CFTC just dropped a landmark document that officially classifies crypto assets. They're actually telling us which crypto assets are securities and which ones aren't - by name! THIS IS SOMETHING GENSLER REFUSED TO DO (he focused on prosecuting crypto out of existence) This rule doc gives crypto many of the benefits of the clarity bill - it lifts us out of the gray market - it gives every asset a path. It's almost like the Clarity act just passed by way of regulator. (of course, the actual clarity act will harden all this into legislation and make it irreversible in the event we get another Gensler, we still want it) This rule says there's 5 categories for crypto assets: 1) Digital Commodities - assets tied to a functional, decentralized crypto system (e.g., BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, DOGE). Not securities. (yes, they name them on page 14) 2) Digital Collectibles - NFTs, meme coins, artwork tokens, in-game items. Not securities (fractionalized collectibles may be an exception). 3) Digital Tools - membership tokens, credentials, domain names (e.g., ENS). Not securities. 4) Stablecoins - payment stablecoins under the GENIUS Act are not securities. Other stablecoins, it depends. 5) Digital Securities - tokenized versions of traditional securities. Like tokenized stocks. Always securities. Amazing! This makes so much sense I can't believe it's coming from a regulator. No more enforcement threats to Ethereum developers and crypto exchanges. How about the Howey test? More common sense! If an issuer makes specific promises of managerial efforts from which buyers expect profits, the offering is a security until those promises are fulfilled. Then it's a commodity. The asset itself was never the security, the deal around it was. (E.g. XRP was a security pre launch, became a commodity after). How about stuff like staking and mining? Mining? Not a securities transaction. Staking? Also not a securities transaction, that includes custodial and liquid staking even with LSTs! How about wrapping BTC? Not a securities transaction. Airdrops? NOT SECURITIES. NO MORE GEO BANS PROTECTING AMERICANS from free airdrops. Remember this is a joint doc from the SEC and CFTC, They're actually cooperating on this, no internal strife, this is binding to both. SEC regulates $80-100 trillion assets CFTC regulates $5-10 trillion assets Both of the world's largest capital markets are showing us that crypto assets are here to stay and they're welcome alongside traditional assets. Every country will follow. This is the biggest move toward legitimacy I've seen in all my time in crypto. Maybe bigger than the genius act since is covers all crypto assets. Well done @MichaelSelig and @SECPaulSAtkins. And especially well done to the indefatigable @HesterPeirce. Her fingerprints are all over this, couldn't have happened without her eight years of principles-based curiosity.

And Supernova is live on BoN! Blocks being produced every 600 ms on all shards, with a large backlog of transactions consumed at activation like it was nothing. Looking good!

Good to know It is also worth noting what kind of network this is. Battle of Nodes does not run on a devnet or testnet. It runs on a shadow fork of mainnet — a fork that copies the actual state of the MultiversX mainnet. The conditions are as close to real as possible without being mainnet itself. That distinction matters for the validity of everything that follows.

@OneDex_X is one underrated project on @MultiversX. Did you knew(?): 1️⃣ You can stake #NFT s from your wallet - or even create your own NFT staking pool. 2️⃣ It has a permissionless launchpad, so anyone can launch a project or join new ones. 3️⃣ It built #FunDex, where you can create your own meme coin in minutes. 🚀 Bonus: Today marks the launch of the first #CLMM ever on @MultiversX, powered by @OneDex_X! Of course, these aren’t the only features of @OneDex_X. There are many more features waiting to be discovered. 💥 Like and retweet so others can discover what’s being built right here! #EGLD #Crypto #DeFi #OneDex

THE EGLD EVOLUTION PROPOSAL HAS PASSED. A landslide. High participation. High conviction. A moment of revival for the MultiversX community. A decisive step, arming the Supernova upgrade with incentives that compound and change outcomes. Participation reached 41.98%, with 94.55% YES votes. One of the highest participation rates not only in MultiversX history, but a record showcasing a case study across all blockchain governance efforts. A smashing success for the investors, builders, and community members who keep contribution at the center of this ecosystem. Your actions are shaping the MultiversX network. In. Real. Time. Thank you for your effort and conviction. The next instrumental milestone in front of us is Staking v5. Meticulous efforts are already accumulating to it. ~16.5% competitive staking incentives. The fuel for a new liquidity rally. In every wave of market uncertainty, lies hidden asymmetric opportunity. For those wise enough to see what others cannot, this becomes a true gift.

@DigitalGoldTalk: Crypto Clarity Amongst Friends x.com/i/broadcasts/1lDxLBmgL…

🇺🇸🇦🇷 MEDIA FLUNKS ECON 101: THE TRUMP–MILEI $40B BAILOUT THAT NEVER WAS If you’ve been anywhere near a TV lately, you’ve probably heard it: “Trump’s $40B bailout for Argentina!” The usual suspects, Reuters, The Guardian, PBS, CNN, Democracy Now, and many others couldn’t resist the headline. It fits their favorite narrative: Trump throwing billions at foreign allies while ignoring Americans at home. Except... that’s completely false. What actually happened is a currency swap and private financing arrangement, not a bailout. The deal includes a $20B Federal Reserve swap line with Argentina’s central bank, which is basically the U.S. lending dollars and receiving pesos of equal value as collateral, plus another $20B in private-sector loans from international banks and sovereign funds. No U.S. Treasury money, no taxpayer exposure, no “blank check” to Buenos Aires. Yet mainstream outlets are calling it a “bailout,” as if Trump just air-dropped cash over the Pampas. Let’s be clear: in a currency swap, Argentina must repay every dollar, with interest. And because the peso surged 9.7% right after President Javier Milei’s midterm win, the U.S. actually made money. When the peso strengthens, America’s collateral becomes more valuable. That’s called a profit, not a pity party. Even Snopes, not exactly a Trump fan club, confirmed that the so-called $40B“pledge” was conditional on Milei’s reforms and electoral success, meaning no money moves without results. That’s more disciplined than most IMF bailouts under the Obama years, which were taxpayer-funded. But this isn’t about the details, it’s about the media’s economic illiteracy. When Obama backed IMF loans to Argentina, the press called it “global cooperation.” When Trump does a swap that earns interest, it’s “reckless favoritism.” That’s not journalism; that’s team sports in disguise. Meanwhile, people like Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) parrot the headlines, blasting the deal as “outrageous” because “hungry Americans” supposedly paid for it. Wrong again. No taxpayer money was spent, but that didn’t stop the viral outrage machine from spinning. Here’s the irony: the Trump–Milei deal actually helps the U.S. by stabilizing a crucial Latin American economy, safeguarding American investments, and curbing Chinese influence in Argentina, all while making a return. That’s called pragmatic diplomacy, not “bailout politics.” So maybe next time, before the media rushes to tweet out another “Trump gives $40B to libertarian buddy” headline, they could at least Google “currency swap.” Because right now, it looks like the real bailout needed is for their financial IQ. Source: Cato Institute, Mises Institute, Heritage Foundation, @SecScottBessent, @JMilei