This is awesome. Gimli is a fan of President Nelson.

😂😂

😂😂😂

Historic Christian theology affirms that Jesus permanently retained his human nature after his death, resurrection, and ascension. He is believed to be the God-man forever. But not seperate beings from the Father and somehow the all powerful Father is incapable of this? Okay.

“Mormons aren’t Christian!” enthusiasts have no explanation for this.

Debating about making this as my header.

Christ is my Savior - John 4:42 & Mosiah 3:17 Christ is my Redeemer - Galatians 3:13 & Ether 3:14 Christ is the Son of God - Matthew 16:16 & 3 Nephi 11:7 Christ condescended - John 1:14 & 1 Nephi 11:16 Christ died for my sins - Romans 5:8 & 2 Nephi 2:6-8 Christ rose from the dead - Luke 24:6 & Mormon 7:5 It is only through Christ’s grace that I can be saved - John 14:6 & Moroni 10:32-33 Christ is both The Father & Son - John 10:30 & Ether 3:14 Everything I believe as a Latter-day Saint is centered on the reality of Christ Jesus. I don’t need to be accepted by Creedal Christians and their subjective theological opinion regarding the Trinitarian dogma that is arbitrarily used as a gate keep for Christianity. I only care what The Father & Son think. Come & See: churchofjesuschrist.org/?lan…

Nope.

Notice that you didn't actually argue anything. You mocked a set of beliefs, distorted several of them, and then declared victory. "God lives on Kolob." No, that's not LDS doctrine. "God of your own planet." Not LDS doctrine. "Celestial space babies." Not LDS doctrine. So right out of the gate, you're attacking beliefs that Latter-day Saints don't even officially hold. More importantly, your entire argument assumes that the Nicene Creed gets to define Christianity. That's the very point under dispute. The apostles were Christians before Nicaea existed. The New Testament existed before Nicaea existed. Christianity existed before Nicaea existed. So merely shouting "You reject the creeds!" doesn't prove someone isn't Christian. It proves they reject the creeds. You also conveniently ignore the fact that Latter-day Saints affirm that Jesus is the Christ, the divine Son of God, the Savior of the world, the risen Lord, and the only source of salvation. If worshiping Jesus, praying in His name, being baptized in His name, preaching His gospel, and centering your entire religion on Him doesn't make someone Christian, then your definition of Christianity is "whoever agrees with my fourth-century metaphysics." And that's the real issue. You're not defending Christianity. You're defending a particular version of Christianity and pretending it's synonymous with Christianity itself. The irony is that your argument boils down to: "You don't believe exactly what I believe about God, therefore you're not Christian." That's not an argument. That's a boundary marker. The question isn't whether Latter-day Saints differ from creedal Christianity. They obviously do. The question is why a council held centuries after Christ gets to determine who counts as a follower of Christ. And that's the question critics like you usually avoid because it's much easier to make jokes about 'space babies' than to defend the authority of Nicaea without begging the question.

One of our living apostles, set the record straight in a very concise way as to how we differ from traditional creedal christianity. I hope you give it a listen. This is Elder Holland (educator and former President of BYU)

Wanna see something see something funny? A Protestant who has an issue with restoration.

🙄

100% remove this handler from the force. This is why police departments get sued.

Underrated

A woman and a chicken trying to separate two fighting cats drew attention

I'm sorry, what? Showing someone why it is Good news and this is what happens? Crazy.