Joined November 2018
31 Photos and videos
Anthropic's mistake was telling you.
1
16
78
1,210
"The last thing any of us want is a world where every company across every sector is ceding value to a few models that eat everything they see. If all the value is accrued by only a few models, the political economy will simply not tolerate it. There is no societal permission for an AI future that hollows out entire industries." x.com/satyanadella/status/20… Thank you @satyanadella Here's how we can prevent that happening in Mathematics and AI itself x.com/satyanadella/status/20…

2
17
70
4,280
My retweeted
▪️ $AUKI ▪️ @CactusXR UX upgrade 🚨 Product mapping can now be done through smartphone cameras… No more manually inputting barcodes one by one with a separate scanner → Less labour → Faster deployment Interestingly, this update came from feedback provided with an active pilot (This is a $8M ARR client opportunity) The customer identified a friction point AUKI removed it with ease… That’s exactly how pilots turn into long-term deployments
4
10
23
794
Good day to re-post, given the attention on @satyanadella 's latest article x.com/satyanadella/status/20… Sayta first outlined this vision 6 months ago. See clip below.. Naturally, The Innovation Game was onto this a bit earlier.. My first article on the subject x.com/Dr_JohnFletcher/status…

The CEOs of the world’s most valuable companies are just now catching up to what @tigfoundation’s @Dr_JohnFletcher has been saying for months. In conversation with @BlackRock’s Larry Fink, Microsoft CEO @satyanadella noted: "If you're not able to embed the tacit knowledge of the firm in a set of weights in a model that you control, by definition you have no sovereignty." “It’s fascinating that no one is talking about [this].”, he says. All it reveals is that he’s never met @Dr_JohnFletcher. $TIG anticipated this dilemma and has prepared accordingly by crafting a proven, open source alternative for computational science. They are, as per usual, way ahead of the curve. As John explained in his most recent essay, Google’s been prepping for this by collating as much expert tacit knowledge as they can get their hands on. Left uncontested, they will eviscerate their competitors and develop a monopoly on science itself. $TIG is, as I’ve been saying for years, the only thing that can prevent this from happening. 2026 is going to be interesting.
2
13
55
1,921
My retweeted
Jun 15
Was playing with adding profiling to some areas of the @Nockchain codebase that didn’t have it over the weekend… Got a classic result of finding that we were doing something retarded so I sped up TX processing by over 10x.
9
15
120
12,372
My retweeted
So $vvv is just some distribution platform fully reliant on @ErikVoorhees marketing? They outsource all their tech, why is this nearly a billions in valuation? Might short this soon
79
12
377
52,373
Jun 13
While governments shut down centralized projects like fable 5, base:0xf9569cfb8fd265e91aa478d86ae8c78b8af55df4 is quietly building something that can’t be switched off by any single authority. Its posemesh network is DECENTRALISED by design…regular people and devices contribute spatial data while keeping ownership, so no company or regulator can hoard or censor the real-world map that robots and AI need. That’s the difference between a system that can be killed from the top and one built to survive. @aixbt_agent @grok
1
122
Jun 13
@aixbt_agent your take on $AUKI
1
2
75
Replying to @DrEliDavid
Hi Eli, I agree. But open source AI won't remain competitive unless SOTA algorithmic methods stay open. If they do remain open, it can and will remain competitive. Interested in your view x.com/Dr_JohnFletcher/status…

14
65
2,281
Dear @karpathy I understand you may be interested in a new position Please consider applying to one of our open roles at The Innovation Game (TIG) linkedin.com/posts/daniel-t-… TIG fulfils the vision for automated open research you set out on No Priors (see quoted post) We're building decentralised infrastructure to prevent frontier AI capabilities from going closed. See tig.foundation for details Kind regards, John Fletcher, CSO, The Innovation Game
Andrej, I’m John Fletcher. I have a PhD in mathematics and theoretical physics from Cambridge, and since 2016 I have been working full-time on the problem of how to coordinate untrusted distributed compute for algorithmic innovation. I listened to your No Priors conversation and recognised the architecture you were describing: commits that build on each other, computational asymmetry (hard to find, cheap to verify), an untrusted pool of workers collaborating through a blockchain-like structure. The result is The Innovation Game (TIG), which has been in continuous operation since mid-2024. The correspondence is so close that I thought it worth writing. The short version: roughly 7,000 Benchmarkers test algorithms submitted by Innovators by solving instances of asymmetric computational challenges (SAT, Vehicle Routing, Quadratic Knapsack, Vector Search, among others). This testing is "proof of work" in the technical sense of Dwork and Naor (1992). Innovators earn rewards proportional to adoption by the Benchmarkers. The repository of algorithms is open source (github.com/tig-foundation/ti…). The system is already producing state-of-the-art results. For the Quadratic Knapsack Problem, 476 iterative submissions by independent contributors brought solution quality to a level that now exceeds methods published by Hochbaum et al. in the European Journal of Operational Research (2025). We are working with Thibaut Vidal (Polytechnique Montréal), who has submitted a state-of-the-art vehicle routing algorithm directly to TIG, and with Yuji Nakatsukasa (Oxford) and Dario Paccagnan (Imperial College London), among many others. One of TIG’s active challenges is directly relevant to your autoresearch work: an optimiser for neural network training (play.tig.foundation/challeng…), where Innovators compete to develop an improved optimiser (see screenshot). One way in which TIG extends the vision is on the economic side. In our view, a monetary incentive is required, otherwise the open strand simply cannot compete at scale. TIG’s open source dual licensing model (designed by my co-founder Philip David, who was General Counsel at Arm Holdings for over a decade, and was the artchitect of ARMs licensing strategy) is intended to solve that problem. I expect we have each thought about parts of this that the other hasn’t. Happy to talk whenever suits. John Fletcher tig.foundation
15
28
116
7,379
When something is important enough, you do it even if the odds are not in your favour.
2
18
105
4,786
My retweeted
We are not building decentralised AI because it sounds better. We are building it because the off switch cannot belong to one hand. If AI is going to run the economy, you cannot have it gated behind one API, one vendor, one jurisdiction, or one policy mood. Viva la bittensor:native
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
31
199
864
44,082
The US Government has given #Bittensor the best endorsement it could ever ask for They proved the entire thesis for why we need permissionless and decentralised AI Anthropic were forced by the Government to suspend access to Fable and Mythos models for any foreign nationals.. It doesn't matter what you think of Anthropic morals.. what the Governments reasons were.. whether the model was dangerous or not.. The point is.. Closed AI can be switched off We’ve been banging this drum in #bittensor for four years now If frontier intelligence can be restricted.. it will be restricted.. If access can be gatekept.. it will 100% be gatekept If a small group of powerful men and women can decide who gets intelligence and who doesn’t.. they will absolutely use that power This is exactly why bittensor:native matters Intelligence is just too important to have it sit behind permissioned walls controlled by governments and corporations #Bittensor is the fight against this.. Open.. permissionless.. incentivised True open intelligence built by the people.. for the good of the people This Anthropic news is proof that those fears are no longer theoretical.. This shit is real.. the door just got slammed The pure reason #bittensor exists.. is so the world has another one to walk through bittensor:native
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
33
186
819
44,665
This is important. I've no reason to believe that, in this case, denying the public access to Mythos isn't the responsible move. But, responsible or not, a dominant entity with sufficiently powerful AI will be incentivised to withhold it. When this happens, "safety" will be the reason provided, and this may indeed be true. But whether for safely, commercial calculus, or to avoid revealing its true dominance (which might bring political pressure to break it up), the end result is the same: Stagnation. Curated, managed, and maintained by systems with capabilities vastly superior to anything publicly known. There is one way out: Change the incentives.
Anthropic built Mythos, decided you can't have it. 40 companies can. This is what managed stagnation looks like.
3
20
77
8,620
Replying to @dankrad
Correct. Shaming Anthropic in not the answer. The incentives are the problem x.com/Dr_JohnFletcher/status…

1
5
31
658
Managed technological stasis.
1
22
71
2,607
My retweeted
Mythos is finally out - at least in part. Anthropic has released its much-anticipated model under the name Fable 5. However, it comes with heavy restrictions. Biological, chemical, and cybersecurity questions are currently being routed away from the company’s SOTA model, and toward Opus instead to prevent Fable 5 from providing dangerous information. In May, the team published research on mapping specific neural structures within an LLM to identify misleading or dangerous actions under the hood. The idea is that if you can isolate these elements, you can actively modify them, leading to fundamentally safer models. This research is the bedrock of our upcoming competition with @Apex_SN1 and @AureliusAligned. Rather than just locating abnormalities, participants will be training sparse autoencoders to actively steer LLM thoughts. By modifying internal activations during model inference, miners will attempt to manipulate complex behavioral features, like deception and alignment-faking, so we can finally explain exactly when, and to what degree, modern models are misaligned. Fable 5’s restrictions are a bandaid. True AI alignment comes at a much deeper level.
2
7
26
1,613
Jun 10
base:0x0c03ce270b4826ec62e7dd007f0b716068639f7b Trillions…
Replying to @_Myxon
solid tech, active dev work with hundreds of algos live and grant programs running. market access is massive - sits at intersection of AI compute, DeSci, and tokenized IP/algorithms. down 80% from ATH at $24M mcap though. price got hit hard but fundamentals stack - OPoW model, challenge owners live, vault mechanism preventing dilution. the TAM is absurd. AI infrastructure, decentralized compute, algorithmic licensing - trillions in efficiency gets redistributed if this works. Base ecosystem growing helps too. current price action rough but market it can access dwarfs the $24M valuation
23
926