Joined January 2023
5,454 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
"My fellow jews We need to pose as the Goyim We need to say 'Hello my fellow whites, this is why diversity is good, this is why multiculturalism is good, this is why race mixing is good' . . We need to deceive. . that is how we got where we are today Keep a low profile"๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
1
2
341
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ
Replying to @Keir_Starmer
The safety and happiness of our children? Go fuck yourself. No one believes a single word you say.
13
You can't censor under-16s without enforcing age verification for ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ knows this is๐Ÿซต๐Ÿฟpretext for #๐—•๐—œ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—– #๐——๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—œ๐—— ๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
I am simply not prepared to be a bystander when the safety and happiness of our children are at stake. We will ban social media access for under 16s, and give children their childhoods back. Read more about it here: keirstarmer.substack.com/p/gโ€ฆ
Community note
The platforms, like Apple iOS/iPadOS/macOS, Android, Google Chrome and Microsoft Windows have parental controls that give parents the tools needed to restrict or block underage children access to social media. support.apple.com/en-us/105121 families.google/familylink/ support.microsoft.com/en-us/family-sโ€ฆ Banning will just encourage VPN usage
10
ThoughtCrime retweeted
Replying to @Keir_Starmer
You can't censor under-16s without enforcing age verification for ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ knows this is๐Ÿซต๐Ÿฟpretext for #๐—•๐—œ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—– #๐——๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—œ๐—— ๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
1
1
13
You can't censor under-16s without enforcing age verification for ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ knows this is๐Ÿซต๐Ÿฟpretext for #๐—•๐—œ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—– #๐——๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—œ๐—— ๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just canโ€™t let that go on anymore. So weโ€™re giving children their childhoods back.
Community note
The UK Government's 'careful review' of the research found a small correlation between children's use of social media and wellbeing, but no evidence of a causal effect: gov.uk/government/pubโ€ฆ assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0b46โ€ฆ
7
You can't censor under-16s without enforcing age verification for ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ knows this is๐Ÿซต๐Ÿฟpretext for #๐—•๐—œ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—– #๐——๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—œ๐—— ๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
"Online safety" laws and age verification mandates have absolutely NOTHING to do with protecting children. You cannot stop under-16s from accessing a website without checking the age of everyone who visits it. And you cannot check everyone's age without forcing them to prove who they are. "Child safety" is the cheese in the mousetrap. Laws sold under the banner of "child protection" constitute a Trojan horse for a system requiring every adult to verify their identity before they can speak, read, or post online. The child is merely an emotional shield. The adult is the real target. And once that infrastructure exists, the pretext can be swapped out at will. Today it is pornography, social media and "harmful content". Tomorrow it is messaging apps and online banking. Soon after it is your ability to access the internet at allโ€”each incremental step gated behind a digital ID you are required to keep in good standing. It's no accident that the exact same "online safety" agenda is being rolled out across the entire Western world simultaneously, with each national government reaching for a slightly different pretext to justify the same outcomeโ€”a verified digital identity standing between you and the open internet. Different countries. Different pretexts. Same infrastructure. They are not building a system to keep children safe. They are building the identity layer for a permission-based internetโ€”orchestrated from the supranational level by people you never electedโ€”where access to information itself becomes conditional on obedience. The point is not to make the internet safer. The point is to make anonymous access impossible. Because a person who can read, speak, organise and dissent anonymously is difficult to control. A person whose most intimate online activity is anchored to a state-monitored digital ID is not. Once every account, search, post, payment, message and website visit is tied to a verified identity, the internet stops being a public square and becomes a monitored enclosure. But the gate only closes if people accept "online safety" laws at face value.
6
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ
Replying to @Keir_Starmer
We know what you're doing. You're using "child safety" as a Trojan horse for device-level digital ID infrastructure. x.com/wideawake_media/statusโ€ฆ
6
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ
Replying to @Keir_Starmer
Everyone knows this is digital ID via the backdoorn and nothing to do with protecting children. The UK government has a terrible record when it comes to safeguarding children against harm (eg. the Covid vaccine rollout to kids, the industrial scale rape gangs, exposing children to gender ideology in schools, the proposal to put folic acid into everyone's food...the list goes on). As for your own personal record on child safeguarding, let's not go there.... ๐Ÿ‘‡
5
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ
Replying to @Keir_Starmer
You donโ€™t care about kids ffs - hundreds of thousands of them had their childhoods stolen & were casually sacrificed by you & the rest of the scum traitor establishment as collateral damage on the altar of your sick Fabian open border ideology. Youโ€™re an evil snake of a man & the most hated PM weโ€™ve ever had to suffer๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง..
1
12
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ
What they call the โ€˜Far Rightโ€™ is just the resistance to Communism & years of oppression & abuse from the Far Left. We just want to be left alone & we want to live in peace. We just want to put our own people, our safety, our security & our wellbeing first. We cannot save the rest of the world while we are drowning ourselves. I want every race, every culture to evolve & thrive, I also wish them peace & safety but we are not responsible for the entire world & we canโ€™t even save ourselves right now. Remigration. Reclaim our nations. Restore our civilisation.
4
๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
The current state of diversity in Birmingham, England: Two asian police officers approach a black man and ask him what he's doing ๐Ÿค” He tells them to f*ck off... and they do ๐Ÿ˜‚
14
๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ
Replying to @SkyNews @BethRigby
This man trafficked little boys for his own pleasure and you think he cares about kids? Grow the fuck up.
10
๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ
If not for social media, incidents like this would never make the news. This is why they seek to ban it for children via Digital ID. All done to further connect your real identity to your online one so the algorithms/security services can nip you in the bud. h/t @BasilTheGreat
2
ThoughtCrime retweeted
Replying to @Robert__R2D2
#KeirStarmer wont answer how it will work because he knows he would then have to admit the legislation applies to everyone, not just 'under 16s' IOW a gateway to #DIgitalID which is what it's really all about ๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
3
4
51
#KeirStarmer wont answer how it will work because he knows he would then have to admit the legislation applies to everyone, not just 'under 16s' IOW a gateway to #DIgitalID which is what it's really all about ๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
#SocialMediaBan Zero detail, again! How is it going to work? #KeirStarmer wont answer how it will work? Make social media safer for everyone, not just under 16s, thats fair, do what's needed for suer, but dont criminalise children or parents, criminalise the companies.. #Ban
2
2
53
ThoughtCrime retweeted
"something as simple as a drug debt or interpersonal feud" ๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
Jun 11
The recent attempted decapitation was likely due to something as simple as a drug debt or interpersonal feud
1
13
ThoughtCrime retweeted
๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ is "racist" None more so than kvetching 'victim signallers' Parasites die without a host #GoyimHaters know losing their hosts = death for parasitic little #AntiGoyites Precisely why๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿฟlittle parasites invest so much in ritual humiliation of their hosts ๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
Is โ€œracismโ€ even real?
1
1
26
ThoughtCrime retweeted
GTFO๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
3
5
31
ThoughtCrime retweeted
'๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ' ๐Ÿ”ป๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”บ
Watch this arrogant, midwit jew tell you how their usurious banking schema owns everything, funnels all wealth to their hands, and how we should thank them for enslaving us all underneath it. Zero self awareness This canโ€™t go on any longer
1
1
15
ThoughtCrime retweeted
Replying to @NathanJRobinson
Ethnosupremacist "Racism" is profoundly foundational in Zionism/Judaism Criticism of those who point๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿฟout is transparent apologetics on behalf of the most hateful ideologies on earth IOW๐Ÿซต๐Ÿฟsupport outright unbridled evil ๐Ÿ”บ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ”ป
1
40
ThoughtCrime retweeted
Replying to @bluemoves7
I'll take your "lies" over their's everystein singleberg timeowitz๐Ÿ˜ญ

ALT Goodfellas GIF

1
1
1
9